Declercq Jana
Department of Linguistics, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Clin J Pain. 2025 Mar 1;41(3):e1273. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001273.
Historically in medicine and beyond, the understanding of and treatment of pain is based on finding tissue injury. The fact that for chronic pain, there often is no (longer) any traceable tissue injury, in combination with the fact that pain essentially is a private experience, poses a challenge for clinical communication. This paper therefore examines how pain is linguistically and interactionally constructed as invisible.
The qualitative approach of interactional sociolinguistic analysis is used to analyze 37 consultations and 11 semistructured interviews with patients with chronic pain, collected at a Belgian pain clinic. This fine-grained approach to studying communication provides an in-depth empirical understanding of the phenomenon under scrutiny.
The data show that pain is constructed as invisible on several levels: (1) on the biomechanical and clinical level, in terms of its lack of visible or traceable tissue injury, (2) on the level of interaction, as pain needs to be made apparent to other people through pain displays, and (3) on the social level, as chronic pain often is not visible or apparent in society more broadly.
The discussion explores how on these 3 levels, notions of the abnormal or deviant body come into play, in which patients and health professionals complexly construct pain both as not normal (i.e., not a neutral or desirable state of being), whereas, at the same time, the lack of traceable tissue injury is constructed as medically normal for chronic pain. This also relates to how patients and health care providers often orient to the stigma around chronic pain.
在医学及其他领域的历史上,对疼痛的理解和治疗基于发现组织损伤。对于慢性疼痛而言,通常不再存在任何可追溯的组织损伤这一事实,加之疼痛本质上是一种个人体验,给临床交流带来了挑战。因此,本文探讨疼痛如何在语言和互动中被建构为无形的。
采用互动社会语言学分析的定性方法,对在比利时一家疼痛诊所收集的37次会诊以及11次对慢性疼痛患者的半结构化访谈进行分析。这种对交流进行细致研究的方法能对所研究的现象提供深入的实证理解。
数据表明,疼痛在几个层面上被建构为无形的:(1)在生物力学和临床层面,因其缺乏可见或可追溯的组织损伤;(2)在互动层面,因为疼痛需要通过疼痛表现向他人显现出来;(3)在社会层面,因为慢性疼痛在更广泛的社会中通常不可见或不明显。
讨论探讨了在这三个层面上,异常或偏离正常的身体观念是如何发挥作用的,患者和健康专业人员如何复杂地将疼痛建构为不正常的(即不是一种中性或理想的存在状态),而与此同时,缺乏可追溯的组织损伤对于慢性疼痛而言在医学上却被建构为正常的。这也涉及到患者和医疗服务提供者如何常常面对围绕慢性疼痛的污名化问题。