Shapiro Jack C, Casey Jonathan D, Qian Edward T, Seitz Kevin P, Wang Li, Lloyd Bradley D, Stollings Joanna L, Freundlich Robert E, Self Wesley H, Rice Todd W, Wanderer Jonathan P, Semler Matthew W
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
Division of Allergy, Pulmonary, and Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
J Intensive Care Med. 2025 May;40(5):486-494. doi: 10.1177/08850666241299378. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
Background: Patients with sepsis frequently require invasive mechanical ventilation. How oxygenation during mechanical ventilation affects clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis remains uncertain. Research Question: To evaluate the effects of different oxygen saturation targets on clinical outcomes for patients with sepsis receiving mechanical ventilation. Study Design and Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the ragmatic nvestigation of optima xygen argets (PILOT) trial dataset among patients who met criteria for sepsis by the Sepsis-3 definition at the time of enrollment. We compared patients randomized to a lower oxygen saturation target (90%; range, 88-92%), an intermediate target (94%; range, 92-96%), and a higher target (98%; range, 96-100%) with regard to the outcomes of 28-day in-hospital mortality and ventilator-free days to study day 28. Results: Of 2541 patients in the PILOT dataset, 805 patients with sepsis were included in the current analysis. In-hospital mortality by day 28 did not differ significantly between the lower target group (48%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 42% to 54%), the intermediate target group (50%; 95% CI, 43% to 56%), and the higher target group (51%; 95% CI, 45% to 56%) (P = 0.83). The number of ventilator-free days to day 28 did not significantly differ between the trial groups, with a mean of 9.9 (standard deviation [SD], 11.8) in the lower oxygen saturation target group, 9.5 (SD, 11.2) in the intermediate group, and 9.4 (SD, 11.4) in the higher group (P = 0.65). Interpretation: Among mechanically ventilated patients with sepsis in a large, randomized trial, the incidence of 28-day in-hospital mortality was not statistically significantly different between the use of a lower, intermediate, or higher oxygen target. However, the confidence intervals included treatment effects that would be clinically meaningfully and further randomized trials of oxygen targets in sepsis are required. Referenced trial name Pragmatic Investigation of optimaL Oxygen Targets Trial (PILOT) ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT03537937URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03537937.
脓毒症患者经常需要有创机械通气。机械通气期间的氧合如何影响脓毒症患者的临床结局仍不确定。研究问题:评估不同氧饱和度目标对接受机械通气的脓毒症患者临床结局的影响。研究设计与方法:我们对实用最佳氧目标(PILOT)试验数据集进行了二次分析,研究对象为入组时符合脓毒症-3定义标准的患者。我们比较了随机分配至较低氧饱和度目标(90%;范围88%-92%)、中等目标(94%;范围92%-96%)和较高目标(98%;范围96%-100%)的患者在28天院内死亡率和至研究第28天无呼吸机天数方面的结局。结果:在PILOT数据集的2541例患者中,805例脓毒症患者纳入本分析。较低目标组(48%;95%置信区间[CI],42%至54%)、中等目标组(50%;95%CI,43%至56%)和较高目标组(51%;95%CI,45%至56%)之间,28天院内死亡率无显著差异(P = 0.83)。各试验组至第28天的无呼吸机天数无显著差异,较低氧饱和度目标组平均为9.9天(标准差[SD],11.8),中等目标组为9.5天(SD,11.2),较高目标组为9.4天(SD,11.4)(P = 0.65)。解读:在一项大型随机试验中,对于接受机械通气的脓毒症患者,采用较低、中等或较高氧目标时,28天院内死亡率的发生率无统计学显著差异。然而,置信区间包含具有临床意义的治疗效果,因此需要进一步开展脓毒症氧目标的随机试验。引用试验名称实用最佳氧目标试验(PILOT)ClinicalTrials.gov编号NCT03537937网址:https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03537937