DeMasi Stephanie C, Clark Alexander T, Muhs Amelia L, Han Jin H, Shipley Kipp, McKinney Jared J, Wang Li, Rice Todd W, Moskowitz Ari, Prekker Matthew E, Johnson Nicholas J, Self Wesley H, Casey Jonathan D, Semler Matthew W, Seitz Kevin P
Department of Emergency Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
medRxiv. 2025 Jan 12:2025.01.10.25320197. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.10.25320197.
More than 600,000 adults in the United States experience a cardiac arrest each year. After resuscitation from cardiac arrest, most patients receive mechanical ventilation. The oxygenation target that optimizes neurologic outcomes after cardiac arrest is uncertain.
After cardiac arrest, does a lower oxygen saturation (SpO) target improve neurologic outcomes compared to a higher SpO target?
We conducted a secondary analysis of patients who experienced a cardiac arrest before enrollment in the Pragmatic Investigation of optimal Oxygen Targets (PILOT) trial. The PILOT trial assigned critically ill adults receiving mechanical ventilation to a lower (88-92%), intermediate, (92-96%), or higher (96-100%) SpO target. This subgroup analysis compared patients randomized to a lower-or-intermediate SpO target (88-96%) versus a higher SpO target (96-100%) with regard to the primary outcome of survival with a favorable neurologic outcome at hospital discharge (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2). The secondary outcome was in-hospital death.
Of 2,987 patients in the PILOT trial, 339 (11.3%) experienced a cardiac arrest before enrollment: 221 were assigned to a lower-or-intermediate SpO target, and 118 were assigned to a higher SpO target. Overall, the median age was 60 years, 43.5% were female, 58.7% experienced an in-hospital cardiac arrest, and 10.2% had an initial shockable rhythm. Survival with a favorable neurologic outcome occurred in 50 patients (22.6%) assigned to a lower-or-intermediate SpO target and 15 (12.7%) patients assigned to a higher SpO target (P=0.03). In-hospital death occurred in 146 patients (66.1%) assigned to a lower-or-intermediate SpO target and 89 (75.4%) assigned to a higher target (P=0.08).
Among patients receiving mechanical ventilation after a cardiac arrest, use of a lower-or-intermediate SpO target was associated with a higher incidence of a favorable neurologic outcome compared with a higher target. A randomized trial comparing these targets in the cardiac arrest population is needed to confirm these findings.
美国每年有超过60万成年人经历心脏骤停。心脏骤停复苏后,大多数患者接受机械通气。心脏骤停后优化神经功能转归的氧合目标尚不确定。
心脏骤停后,较低的血氧饱和度(SpO)目标与较高的SpO目标相比,是否能改善神经功能转归?
我们对在实用最佳氧目标研究(PILOT)试验入组前经历心脏骤停的患者进行了二次分析。PILOT试验将接受机械通气的危重症成年人随机分配至较低(88%-92%)、中等(92%-96%)或较高(96%-100%)的SpO目标组。该亚组分析比较了随机分配至较低或中等SpO目标(88%-96%)与较高SpO目标(96%-100%)的患者在出院时具有良好神经功能转归的生存这一主要结局(脑功能分类1或2)。次要结局是院内死亡。
在PILOT试验的2987例患者中,339例(11.3%)在入组前经历了心脏骤停:221例被分配至较低或中等SpO目标组,118例被分配至较高SpO目标组。总体而言,中位年龄为60岁,43.5%为女性,58.7%经历了院内心脏骤停,10.2%初始心律可电击复律。较低或中等SpO目标组的50例患者(22.6%)和较高SpO目标组的15例患者(12.7%)实现了具有良好神经功能转归的生存(P=0.03)。较低或中等SpO目标组的146例患者(66.1%)和较高目标组的89例患者(75.4%)发生了院内死亡(P=0.08)。
在心脏骤停后接受机械通气的患者中,与较高目标相比,使用较低或中等SpO目标与良好神经功能转归的发生率较高相关。需要在心脏骤停人群中进行比较这些目标的随机试验来证实这些发现。