Suppr超能文献

基于CT的微动分析方法与基于标记物的RSA在测量股骨头移位及其观察者内和观察者间可靠性评估中的比较:一项针对27例患者长达1年的前瞻性一致性诊断研究。

Comparison of the CT-based micromotion analysis method versus marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head translation and evaluation of its intra- and interobserver reliability: a prospective agreement diagnostic study on 27 patients up to 1 year.

作者信息

Angelomenos Vasileios, Shareghi Bita, Itayem Raed, Mohaddes Maziar

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.

Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Orthop. 2025 Jan 9;96:38-44. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42705.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Computed tomography radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) assesses implant micromovements using low-dose CT scans. We aimed to investigate whether CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) measuring early femoral head migration in cemented stems. We hypothesized that CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based RSA in evaluating femoral head subsidence.

METHODS

We prospectively included 31 patients undergoing cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), of which 27 were eligible for the analysis. Femoral head migration at 1 year was measured with marker-based RSA and CT-RSA. Comparison was performed using paired analysis and Bland-Altman plots, and the intra- and interobserver reliability of CT-RSA was assessed Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) translation on the Y-axis measured with marker-based RSA was -0.86 mm (-1.10 to -0.37) and -0.83 mm (-1.11 to -0.48) for CT-RSA (i.e. subsidence), with a median difference of -0.03 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.08 to 0.18). The minimal important difference in translation was set to 0.2 mm. This value was excluded from the CI of the differences. No statistical difference was found between marker-based RSA and CT-RSA regarding assessment of subsidence of the femoral head. The Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between the 2 methods in measuring subsidence of the femoral head. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was excellent with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 1 (0.99-1) and ICC = 0.99 (0.99-1), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We showed that CT-RSA was comparable to marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head subsidence. Moreover, the intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was excellent, suggesting that the method is assessor independent.

摘要

背景与目的

计算机断层扫描放射立体分析(CT-RSA)使用低剂量CT扫描评估植入物的微动。我们旨在研究CT-RSA与基于标记物的放射立体分析(RSA)在测量骨水泥型股骨柄早期股骨头移位方面是否具有可比性。我们假设在评估股骨头下沉方面,CT-RSA与基于标记物的RSA具有可比性。

方法

我们前瞻性纳入了31例行骨水泥型全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者,其中27例符合分析条件。采用基于标记物的RSA和CT-RSA测量1年时的股骨头移位。使用配对分析和Bland-Altman图进行比较,并评估CT-RSA的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。结果:基于标记物的RSA测量的Y轴平移中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为-0.86mm(-1.10至-0.37),CT-RSA为-0.83mm(-1.11至-0.48)(即下沉),中位数差异为-0.03mm(95%置信区间[CI]-0.08至0.18)。平移的最小重要差异设定为0.2mm。该值被排除在差异的CI之外。在评估股骨头下沉方面,基于标记物的RSA与CT-RSA之间未发现统计学差异。Bland-Altman图显示两种方法在测量股骨头下沉方面具有良好的一致性。CT-RSA方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性极佳,组内相关系数(ICC)分别为1(0.99 - 1)和0.99(0.99 - 1)。

结论

我们表明,在测量股骨头下沉方面,CT-RSA与基于标记物的RSA具有可比性。此外,CT-RSA方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性极佳,表明该方法不依赖评估者。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7dc8/11734532/5b44733fbdf7/ActaO-96-42705-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验