Angelomenos Vasileios, Shareghi Bita, Itayem Raed, Mohaddes Maziar
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg; Department of Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Department of Orthopaedics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Acta Orthop. 2025 Jan 9;96:38-44. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2024.42705.
Computed tomography radiostereometric analysis (CT-RSA) assesses implant micromovements using low-dose CT scans. We aimed to investigate whether CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based radiostereometric analysis (RSA) measuring early femoral head migration in cemented stems. We hypothesized that CT-RSA is comparable to marker-based RSA in evaluating femoral head subsidence.
We prospectively included 31 patients undergoing cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA), of which 27 were eligible for the analysis. Femoral head migration at 1 year was measured with marker-based RSA and CT-RSA. Comparison was performed using paired analysis and Bland-Altman plots, and the intra- and interobserver reliability of CT-RSA was assessed Results: The median (interquartile range [IQR]) translation on the Y-axis measured with marker-based RSA was -0.86 mm (-1.10 to -0.37) and -0.83 mm (-1.11 to -0.48) for CT-RSA (i.e. subsidence), with a median difference of -0.03 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.08 to 0.18). The minimal important difference in translation was set to 0.2 mm. This value was excluded from the CI of the differences. No statistical difference was found between marker-based RSA and CT-RSA regarding assessment of subsidence of the femoral head. The Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement between the 2 methods in measuring subsidence of the femoral head. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was excellent with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 1 (0.99-1) and ICC = 0.99 (0.99-1), respectively.
We showed that CT-RSA was comparable to marker-based RSA in measuring femoral head subsidence. Moreover, the intra- and interobserver reliability of the CT-RSA method was excellent, suggesting that the method is assessor independent.
计算机断层扫描放射立体分析(CT-RSA)使用低剂量CT扫描评估植入物的微动。我们旨在研究CT-RSA与基于标记物的放射立体分析(RSA)在测量骨水泥型股骨柄早期股骨头移位方面是否具有可比性。我们假设在评估股骨头下沉方面,CT-RSA与基于标记物的RSA具有可比性。
我们前瞻性纳入了31例行骨水泥型全髋关节置换术(THA)的患者,其中27例符合分析条件。采用基于标记物的RSA和CT-RSA测量1年时的股骨头移位。使用配对分析和Bland-Altman图进行比较,并评估CT-RSA的观察者内和观察者间可靠性。结果:基于标记物的RSA测量的Y轴平移中位数(四分位间距[IQR])为-0.86mm(-1.10至-0.37),CT-RSA为-0.83mm(-1.11至-0.48)(即下沉),中位数差异为-0.03mm(95%置信区间[CI]-0.08至0.18)。平移的最小重要差异设定为0.2mm。该值被排除在差异的CI之外。在评估股骨头下沉方面,基于标记物的RSA与CT-RSA之间未发现统计学差异。Bland-Altman图显示两种方法在测量股骨头下沉方面具有良好的一致性。CT-RSA方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性极佳,组内相关系数(ICC)分别为1(0.99 - 1)和0.99(0.99 - 1)。
我们表明,在测量股骨头下沉方面,CT-RSA与基于标记物的RSA具有可比性。此外,CT-RSA方法的观察者内和观察者间可靠性极佳,表明该方法不依赖评估者。