He Yitong, Jiang Weiqing, Wang Wanxin, Liu Qianyu, Peng Shuyi, Guo Lan
Department of Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Dec 2;7(12):e2452816. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.52816.
Studies investigating the role of supportive school environments in associations between adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and nonsuicidal self-injury (NSSI) and suicidality among adolescents are lacking.
To assess associations of ACEs with NSSI and suicidality among adolescents and examine the modifying role of supportive school environments in such associations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Using data from the 2021 School-Based Chinese Adolescents Health Survey, this cross-sectional study includes Chinese adolescents in grades 7 through 12 from 326 schools across 8 provinces in China. Statistical analysis was performed from March to October 2024.
ACEs, including individual indicators and cumulative numbers by total and categorized as threat-related and deprivation-related ACEs, were assessed.
NSSI, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts were measured using validated questionnaires. Weighted Poisson regression models were used. The modifying interaction of supportive school environments was assessed using multiplicative interactions.
Among 95 549 adolescents included in this study (mean [SD] age, 14.9 [1.8] years; 47 617 males [49.8%]), 45 236 individuals (47.3%) had experienced at least 1 ACE. Compared with adolescents with no ACEs, those who experienced 4 or more ACEs had an increased risk of NSSI (prevalence ratio [PR], 1.31; 95% CI, 1.30-1.33) and suicidality (ideation: PR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.39-1.42; attempts: PR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.24-1.27) after adjusting for covariates, including supportive school environments. A dose-response association was observed between the number of ACEs and the risk of NSSI and suicidality (eg, NSSI: PR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.05-1.06 for exposure to 1 vs 0 ACEs; PR, 1.10; 95% CI, 1.10-1.11 for exposure to 2 vs 0 ACEs). The highest PRs were found for associations of threat-related ACEs (eg, physical abuse, emotional abuse, and bullying) with NSSI and suicidality (eg, exposure to ≥2 vs 0 threat-related ACEs: PR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.27-1.29 for NSSI; PR, 1.33; 95% CI 1.32-1.34 for ideation; PR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.17-1.19 for attempts). All individual ACE indicators were positively associated with NSSI and suicidality, with particularly high PRs for emotional abuse (eg, PR, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.24-1.27 for NSSI). Additionally, supportive school environments significantly modified associations of ACEs with NSSI and suicidality (eg, interaction ratio for NSSI, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.76-0.88).
In this study, exposure to ACEs was associated with an increased risk of NSSI and suicidality, with particularly high increases for threat-related ACEs, independent of the interaction of supportive school environments, but supportive school environments could modify such detrimental outcomes. These findings underscore the importance of enhancing school environments to prevent NSSI and suicidality among adolescents who have experienced ACEs.
缺乏关于支持性学校环境在青少年不良童年经历(ACEs)与非自杀性自伤(NSSI)及自杀倾向之间关联中所起作用的研究。
评估青少年中ACEs与NSSI及自杀倾向之间的关联,并检验支持性学校环境在此类关联中的调节作用。
设计、设置和参与者:利用2021年中国青少年学校健康调查的数据,这项横断面研究纳入了中国8个省份326所学校7至12年级的中国青少年。统计分析于2024年3月至10月进行。
评估了ACEs,包括个体指标以及按总体和类别划分的累积数量,分为与威胁相关和与剥夺相关的ACEs。
使用经过验证的问卷测量NSSI、自杀意念和自杀未遂情况。采用加权泊松回归模型。使用乘法交互作用评估支持性学校环境的调节交互作用。
在本研究纳入的95549名青少年中(平均[标准差]年龄为14.9[1.8]岁;47617名男性[49.8%]),45236人(47.3%)至少经历过1次ACE。与未经历ACEs的青少年相比,经历4次或更多ACEs的青少年在调整协变量(包括支持性学校环境)后,NSSI(患病率比[PR],1.31;95%置信区间,1.30 - 1.33)和自杀倾向(意念:PR,1.41;95%置信区间,1.39 - 1.42;未遂:PR,1.25;95%置信区间,1.24 - 1.27)的风险增加。观察到ACEs数量与NSSI和自杀倾向风险之间存在剂量反应关联(例如,NSSI:暴露于1次与0次ACEs相比,PR,1.06;95%置信区间,1.05 - 1.06;暴露于2次与0次ACEs相比,PR,1.10;95%置信区间,1.10 - 1.11)。与NSSI和自杀倾向关联的最高PRs出现在与威胁相关的ACEs(例如,身体虐待、情感虐待和欺凌)中(例如,暴露于≥2次与0次与威胁相关的ACEs相比:NSSI的PR,1.28;95%置信区间,1.27 - 1.29;意念的PR,1.33;95%置信区间1.32 - 1.34;未遂的PR,1.18;95%置信区间,1.17 - 1.19)。所有个体ACE指标均与NSSI和自杀倾向呈正相关,情感虐待的PRs尤其高(例如,NSSI的PR,1.26;95%置信区间,1.24 - 1.27)。此外,支持性学校环境显著调节了ACEs与NSSI和自杀倾向之间的关联(例如,NSSI的交互比,0.81;95%置信区间,0.76 - 0.88)。
在本研究中,暴露于ACEs与NSSI和自杀倾向风险增加相关,与威胁相关的ACEs增加幅度尤其大,独立于支持性学校环境的交互作用,但支持性学校环境可改变此类有害结局。这些发现强调了改善学校环境以预防经历过ACEs的青少年发生NSSI和自杀倾向的重要性。