Ghasemi Alireza, Ghasemi Mohammadreza, Rashidian Maryam, Bastan Fatemeh, Baghaei Amir
Department of Toxicology and Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Student Research Committee, School of Medicine, Alborz University of Medical Sciences, Karaj, Iran.
Int Urol Nephrol. 2025 Jun;57(6):1865-1883. doi: 10.1007/s11255-024-04333-w. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of melatonin in drug- or contrast-induced AKI in preclinical and clinical studies.
PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science (WOS), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR), and clinical trials.GOV from the beginning until August 1, 2024. On the basis of the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the articles were included by two independent researchers. Data regarding study design, patient characteristics, the number of patients with and without AKI, and the means and SDs of the serum creatinine and BUN levels were extracted from relevant studies. STATA version 17.0 was used to compute pooled measures of standardized mean differences, standardized mean differences, risk ratios and risk differences. I2 and chi-square tests were used to assess heterogeneity between studies. Funnel plots, Egger tests and the trim-and-fill method were used to evaluate small study effects (publication bias). The risk of bias of the included clinical and preclinical studies was assessed via the Cochrane ROB tool and SYRCLE tool, respectively. The credibility of the results was evaluated via GRADE. Sensitivity analysis was performed via the one-out removal method.
We identified 1,696 nonduplicate records, of which the full texts of 159 articles were examined. Twenty-nine animal experimental studies and 5 clinical trials met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review. The results of the meta-analysis confirmed that melatonin was significantly effective at reducing the serum creatinine level (standardized mean difference: - 3.04; 95% CI - 3.904 to - 2.183, with 95% prediction interval: - 7.201 to 1.163) and the BUN level (standardized mean difference: - 3.464; 95% CI - 4.378 to - 2.549, with 95% prediction interval: - 7.839 to 0.911) in drug-induced AKI animal studies. Melatonin did not have a significant effect on the serum creatinine level (standardized mean difference: - 2.67; 95% CI - 9.69 to - 4.35, with 95% prediction interval: - 42.618 to 37.278) or the BUN level (standardized mean difference: - 1.77; 95% CI - 5.533 to - 1.994, with 95% prediction interval: -22.943 to 19.404) in contrast-induced AKI animal studies. Furthermore, in clinical studies, melatonin had no significant effect on reducing the serum creatinine level (standardized mean difference: 0.183; 95% CI - 1.309 to 1.675, with 95% prediction interval: - 7.975 to 8.340), BUN level (standardized mean difference: 0.206; 95% CI - 0.0871 to 1.283, with 95% prediction interval: - 5.115 to 5.528) or risk of AKI incidence (risk ratio: 0.877; 95% CI 0.46 to 1.64, with 95% prediction interval: - 0.238 to 3.174; risk difference: - 0.06 mg/dl; 95% CI - 0.259 to 0.40 mg/dl, with 95% prediction interval: - 0.467 to 0.348). There were no significant publication biases, and after sensitivity analysis, no considerable changes were observed, indicating the robustness of the results.
This meta-analysis indicates that melatonin may protect against drug-induced AKI in animal models but is not effective in clinical studies and that melatonin has no significant effect on contrast-induced AKI. Owing to the inconclusive results in clinical trials and very low certainty of evidence, further research with higher methodological quality is needed to reach a more certain conclusion.
本系统评价和荟萃分析的目的是评估褪黑素在临床前和临床研究中对药物或造影剂诱导的急性肾损伤(AKI)的疗效。
检索PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science(WOS)、Cochrane系统评价数据库(CDSR)以及clinical trials.GOV,检索时间从开始至2024年8月1日。根据纳入和排除标准,由两名独立研究人员纳入文章。从相关研究中提取关于研究设计、患者特征、发生和未发生AKI的患者数量以及血清肌酐和尿素氮水平的均值和标准差的数据。使用STATA 17.0计算标准化均数差、标准化均数差、风险比和风险差的合并测量值。使用I²和卡方检验评估研究间的异质性。使用漏斗图、Egger检验和修剪填充法评估小研究效应(发表偏倚)。分别通过Cochrane ROB工具和SYRCLE工具评估纳入的临床和临床前研究的偏倚风险。通过GRADE评估结果的可信度。通过逐一剔除法进行敏感性分析。
我们识别出1696条非重复记录,其中对159篇文章的全文进行了审查。29项动物实验研究和5项临床试验符合纳入标准并被纳入本评价。荟萃分析结果证实,在药物诱导的AKI动物研究中,褪黑素在降低血清肌酐水平(标准化均数差:-3.04;95%置信区间-3.904至-2.183,95%预测区间:-7.201至1.163)和尿素氮水平(标准化均数差:-3.464;95%置信区间-4.378至-2.549,95%预测区间:-7.839至0.911)方面具有显著效果。在造影剂诱导的AKI动物研究中,褪黑素对血清肌酐水平(标准化均数差:-2.67;95%置信区间-9.69至-4.35,95%预测区间:-42.618至37.278)或尿素氮水平(标准化均数差:-1.77;95%置信区间-5.533至-1.994,95%预测区间:-22.943至19.404)没有显著影响。此外,在临床研究中,褪黑素在降低血清肌酐水平(标准化均数差:0.183;95%置信区间-1.309至1.675,95%预测区间:-7.975至8.340)、尿素氮水平(标准化均数差:0.206;95%置信区间-0.0871至1.283,95%预测区间:-5.115至5.528)或AKI发生率风险(风险比:0.877;95%置信区间0.46至1.64,95%预测区间:-0.238至3.174;风险差:-0.06mg/dl;95%置信区间-0.259至0.40mg/dl,95%预测区间:-0.467至0.348)方面没有显著影响。没有显著的发表偏倚,敏感性分析后未观察到显著变化,表明结果具有稳健性。
本荟萃分析表明,褪黑素可能在动物模型中预防药物诱导的AKI,但在临床研究中无效,且褪黑素对造影剂诱导的AKI没有显著影响。由于临床试验结果不明确且证据确定性很低,需要开展方法学质量更高的进一步研究以得出更确定的结论。