Parker Adam J, Slattery Timothy J
Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, Department of Experimental Psychology, University College London.
Faculty of Science & Technology, Department of Psychology, Bournemouth University.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2025 Jan;51(1):92-112. doi: 10.1037/xhp0001245.
Computational models of eye movement control during reading have revolutionized the study of visual, perceptual, and linguistic processes underlying reading. However, these models can only simulate and test predictions about the reading of single lines of text. Here we report two studies that examined how input variables for lexical processing (frequency and predictability) in these models influence the processing of line-final words. The first study was a linear mixed-effects analysis of the Provo Corpus, which included data from 84 readers reading 55 multiline texts. The second study was a preregistered eye movement experiment, where 32 participants read 128 items where frequency, predictability, and position (intraline vs. line-final) were orthogonally manipulated. Both studies were consistent in showing that reading times were shorter on line-final words. While there was mixed evidence for frequency and predictability effects in the Provo Corpus, our experimental data confirmed additive effects of frequency and predictability for line-final words, which did not differ from those for intraline words. We conclude that while models that make additive assumptions about the role of frequency and predictability may be better suited to modeling the current findings, additional assumptions are required if models are to be capable of modeling shorter reading times on line-final words. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).
阅读过程中眼动控制的计算模型彻底改变了对阅读背后的视觉、感知和语言过程的研究。然而,这些模型只能模拟和测试关于单行文本阅读的预测。在此,我们报告两项研究,考察了这些模型中词汇加工的输入变量(频率和可预测性)如何影响行末单词的加工。第一项研究是对普罗沃语料库进行的线性混合效应分析,该语料库包含84名读者阅读55篇多行文本的数据。第二项研究是一项预先注册的眼动实验,32名参与者阅读了128个项目,其中频率、可预测性和位置(行内与行末)被正交操纵。两项研究均一致表明,行末单词的阅读时间更短。虽然在普罗沃语料库中关于频率和可预测性效应的证据不一,但我们的实验数据证实了频率和可预测性对行末单词的累加效应,这与行内单词的效应并无差异。我们得出结论,虽然对频率和可预测性作用做出累加假设的模型可能更适合对当前研究结果进行建模,但如果模型要能够对行末单词更短的阅读时间进行建模,则需要额外的假设。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c)2025美国心理学会,保留所有权利)