Suppr超能文献

基于百分比、自感用力度、储备重复次数和基于速度的训练对运动表现和疲劳反应的影响。

The Effects of Percentage-Based, Rating of Perceived Exertion, Repetitions in Reserve, and Velocity-Based Training on Performance and Fatigue Responses.

作者信息

Cowley Nicholas, Nicholson Vaughan, Timmins Ryan, Munteanu Gabriella, Wood Tandia, García-Ramos Amador, Owen Cameron, Weakley Jonathon

机构信息

School of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.

Sports Performance, Recovery, Injury and New Technologies (SPRINT) Research Center, Australian Catholic University, Brisbane, Australia.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2025 Apr 1;39(4):e516-e529. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000005026. Epub 2025 Jan 7.

Abstract

Cowley, N, Nicholson, V, Timmins, R, Munteanu, G, Wood, T, García-Ramos, A, Owen, C, and Weakley, J. The effects of percentage-based, rating of perceived exertion, repetitions in reserve, and velocity-based training on performance and fatigue responses. J Strength Cond Res 39(4): e516-e529, 2025-This study assessed the effects of percentage-based training (%1RM), rating of perceived exertion (RPE), repetitions in reserve (RIR), and velocity-based training (VBT) on (a) acute kinematic outputs, perceptions of effort, and changes in neuromuscular function during resistance training; and (b) neuromuscular fatigue and perceptions of soreness 24 hours after exercise. In a randomized crossover design, 15 subjects completed a %1RM, RPE, RIR, and VBT training condition involving a fatiguing protocol followed by 5 sets of the free-weight back squat and bench press at 70% of 1 repetition maximum. Subjects returned at 24 hours to assess neuromuscular fatigue and perceived soreness. Percentage-based training and RPE allowed the smallest volume loads, with %1RM prescription causing sets to be regularly taken to failure. Alternatively, RIR and VBT allowed greater maintenance of training volume. Velocity-based training had the most accurate training prescription, with all sets being within 5% of the intended starting velocity, while the RPE and %1RM prescriptive methods caused subjects to train with loads that were increasingly inaccurate. The RPE prescriptive method had the lowest reported values for differential RPE while the %1RM had the greatest change across the session. At no point were there between-group differences in measures of neuromuscular fatigue or perceived soreness. These findings demonstrate that autoregulatory prescriptive methods can be used to mitigate the risk of training to failure, ensure accurate training prescription that can maintain training volume, and enhance within-training kinematic outputs without altering neuromuscular fatigue or perceptions of soreness.

摘要

考利,N、尼科尔森,V、廷明斯,R、蒙特亚努,G、伍德,T、加西亚 - 拉莫斯,A、欧文,C 和威克利,J。基于百分比、主观用力程度评级、保留重复次数和基于速度的训练对运动表现和疲劳反应的影响。《力量与体能研究杂志》39(4): e516 - e529,2025年——本研究评估了基于百分比的训练(%1RM)、主观用力程度评级(RPE)、保留重复次数(RIR)和基于速度的训练(VBT)对以下方面的影响:(a)阻力训练期间的急性运动学输出、用力感知以及神经肌肉功能的变化;(b)运动后24小时的神经肌肉疲劳和酸痛感。在随机交叉设计中,15名受试者完成了%1RM、RPE、RIR和VBT训练条件,包括一个疲劳方案,随后以1次最大重复量的70%进行5组自由重量深蹲和卧推。受试者在24小时后返回评估神经肌肉疲劳和感知到的酸痛感。基于百分比的训练和RPE允许的训练量负荷最小,%1RM处方会导致训练组经常做到力竭。相比之下,RIR和VBT允许更大程度地维持训练量。基于速度的训练具有最准确的训练处方,所有训练组的起始速度都在预期起始速度的5%以内,而RPE和%1RM规定方法导致受试者使用的负荷越来越不准确。RPE规定方法的差异RPE报告值最低,而%1RM在整个训练过程中的变化最大。在神经肌肉疲劳或感知到的酸痛感测量方面,组间在任何时候都没有差异。这些发现表明,自动调节规定方法可用于降低训练至力竭的风险,确保能够维持训练量的准确训练处方,并在不改变神经肌肉疲劳或酸痛感的情况下增强训练期间的运动学输出。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验