• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者回肠直肠吻合术和回肠贮袋肛管吻合术后的癌症风险及再次手术风险

Risk of Cancer and Reoperation After Ileorectal Anastomosis and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.

作者信息

Bouchiba Hicham, Aelvoet Arthur S, Pellisé Maria, Bastiaansen Barbara A J, van Leerdam Monique E, Langers Alexandra M J, Balaguer Francesc, Miedema Thymen N, Anele Chukwuemeka C, Daca-Alvarez Maria, Bossuyt Patrick M M, Ricciardiello Luigi, Jover Rodrigo, Hompes Roel, Karstensen John G, Latchford Andrew, Dekker Evelien

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 31;120(9):2132-2138. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003273.

DOI:10.14309/ajg.0000000000003273
PMID:39787348
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To prevent colorectal cancer, most patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) undergo (procto)colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). After surgery, these patients remain at risk of developing cancer in the remnant rectum or rectal cuff/pouch. We aimed to compare the long-term risk of cancer after IRA or IPAA in FAP.

METHODS

We performed an international multicenter historical cohort study of FAP patients undergoing IRA or IPAA from 1990 to 2023. The proportion of patients developing cancer after surgery was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

(Procto)colectomy was performed in 685 patients (53.6% female); 366 (53.4%) had IRA, and 319 (46.6%) had IPAA. Median age at IRA and IPAA was 23 and 27 years, and the median follow-up was 12 and 15 years, respectively. Overall, 8 patients (2.2%) developed rectal and/or rectal cuff/pouch cancer after IRA and 0.9% after IPAA. The estimated 10- and 20-year cancer incidence after IRA vs IPAA was 1.6% vs 0.4% and 2.5% vs 0.9%, respectively (log-rank P = 0.15). Reoperations, mainly for extensive polyposis, were performed in 39 (10.7%) patients with an IRA and 24 (7.5%) patients after IPAA. The number of postoperative endoscopic surveillance endoscopies was higher in patients with an IRA compared with those with an IPAA ( P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Over the past 3 decades, few patients were diagnosed with cancer in the rectum or rectal cuff/pouch after (procto)colectomy in FAP. This might be due to an improved selection of the type of (procto)colectomy and close endoscopic surveillance including prophylactic polypectomies.

摘要

引言

为预防结直肠癌,大多数家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)患者会接受(直肠)结肠切除术并进行回肠直肠吻合术(IRA)或回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)。术后,这些患者仍有在残留直肠或直肠袖口/贮袋发生癌症的风险。我们旨在比较FAP患者接受IRA或IPAA术后发生癌症的长期风险。

方法

我们对1990年至2023年接受IRA或IPAA的FAP患者进行了一项国际多中心历史队列研究。使用Kaplan-Meier方法估计术后发生癌症的患者比例。

结果

685例患者接受了(直肠)结肠切除术(女性占53.6%);366例(53.4%)接受IRA,319例(46.6%)接受IPAA。IRA和IPAA的中位年龄分别为23岁和27岁,中位随访时间分别为12年和15年。总体而言,8例(2.2%)接受IRA的患者术后发生直肠和/或直肠袖口/贮袋癌,接受IPAA的患者为0.9%。IRA与IPAA术后估计的10年和20年癌症发病率分别为1.6%对0.4%和2.5%对0.9%(对数秩检验P = 0.15)。主要因广泛性息肉病进行再次手术的患者,接受IRA的有39例(10.7%),接受IPAA的有24例(7.5%)。接受IRA的患者术后内镜监测内镜检查的次数高于接受IPAA的患者(P < 0.001)。

讨论

在过去30年中,FAP患者在(直肠)结肠切除术后很少被诊断出直肠或直肠袖口/贮袋癌。这可能是由于(直肠)结肠切除术类型的选择改善以及包括预防性息肉切除术在内的密切内镜监测。

相似文献

1
Risk of Cancer and Reoperation After Ileorectal Anastomosis and Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者回肠直肠吻合术和回肠贮袋肛管吻合术后的癌症风险及再次手术风险
Am J Gastroenterol. 2024 Dec 31;120(9):2132-2138. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000003273.
2
Endoscopic management of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis after prophylactic colectomy or restorative proctocolectomy - systematic review of the literature.家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者预防性结肠切除或直肠结肠切除术后的内镜治疗 - 文献系统评价。
Radiol Oncol. 2024 Jun 11;58(2):153-169. doi: 10.2478/raon-2024-0029. eCollection 2024 Jun 1.
3
Feasibility of laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: results of a nationwide multicenter study.腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术加回肠储袋肛管吻合术以及全结肠切除术加回肠直肠吻合术治疗家族性腺瘤性息肉病的可行性:一项全国多中心研究结果
Int J Clin Oncol. 2016 Oct;21(5):953-961. doi: 10.1007/s10147-016-0977-x. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
4
Development of Desmoid Tumors After Ileorectal Anastomosis Versus Ileal Pouch-Anal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis.家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者行回肠直肠吻合术与回肠储袋肛管吻合术后发生腹壁纤维瘤的风险比较。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024 Nov;22(11):2319-2326. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2024.06.018. Epub 2024 Jul 4.
5
Comparison of proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis.家族性腺瘤性息肉病中全结直肠切除回肠储袋肛管吻合术与结肠切除回肠直肠吻合术的比较。
Fam Cancer. 2015 Jun;14(2):221-7. doi: 10.1007/s10689-014-9773-9.
6
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the outcome of ileal pouch-anal anastomosis in patients with ulcerative colitis versus patients with familial adenomatous polyposis.一项系统性回顾和荟萃分析溃疡性结肠炎患者与家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者行回肠贮袋肛管吻合术的结局。
Tech Coloproctol. 2022 Sep;26(9):691-705. doi: 10.1007/s10151-022-02617-w. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
7
Restorative proctocolectomy or rectum-preserving surgery in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: results of a prospective study.家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者的保留直肠手术或恢复性直肠结肠切除术:一项前瞻性研究的结果
World J Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(6):653-8; discussion 659. doi: 10.1007/s002689900289.
8
Ileorectal anastomosis in ulcerative colitis: what do surgeons and patients need to know? A systematic literature review.溃疡性结肠炎的回直肠吻合术:外科医生和患者需要了解什么?一项系统的文献综述。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2025 Mar;107(3):174-179. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2024.0012. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
9
Risk of Proctectomy After Ileorectal Anastomosis in Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Modern Era.现代家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者回直肠吻合术后行直肠切除术的风险
Dis Colon Rectum. 2024 Mar 1;67(3):427-434. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003157. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
10
Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis experience better bowel function and quality of life after ileorectal anastomosis than after ileoanal pouch.与回肠肛管袋状吻合术相比,家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者在回肠直肠吻合术后肠道功能和生活质量更佳。
Colorectal Dis. 2003 Jan;5(1):38-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-1318.2003.00413.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical management of the colorectum in FAP: tailored approaches for optimal outcomes.家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者结直肠的手术治疗:实现最佳疗效的个体化方法
Fam Cancer. 2025 Sep 5;24(4):69. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00492-6.
2
Familial adenomatous polyposis: non-surgical management of large bowel disease: endoscopic and chemoprevention strategies.家族性腺瘤性息肉病:大肠疾病的非手术治疗:内镜及化学预防策略
Fam Cancer. 2025 Jun 1;24(2):53. doi: 10.1007/s10689-025-00480-w.