Suppr超能文献

家族性腺瘤性息肉病患者的保留直肠手术或恢复性直肠结肠切除术:一项前瞻性研究的结果

Restorative proctocolectomy or rectum-preserving surgery in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: results of a prospective study.

作者信息

Tonelli F, Valanzano R, Monaci I, Mazzoni P, Anastasi A, Ficari F

机构信息

Dipartimento di Fisiopatologia Clinica, Policlinico di Careggi, Università degli Studi, Florence, Italy.

出版信息

World J Surg. 1997 Jul-Aug;21(6):653-8; discussion 659. doi: 10.1007/s002689900289.

Abstract

Surgical treatment of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) is still controversial. From 1984 we carried out a prospective evaluation of total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA) and restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) to determine differences in postoperative complications, functional results, occurrence of desmoids, and recurrence of polyps in the rectal stump. IRA was performed below the peritoneal reflection and was indicated in the absence of rectal cancer and in the presence of fewer than 10 polyps or minute polyposis in the last 10 cm of the rectal mucosa. IRA patients underwent a regular endoscopic follow-up and prolonged sulindac administration (100 mg twice daily). When criteria for IRA were absent, IPAA was performed adopting a manual anastomosis at the pectinate line. Fourteen patients were operated with IRA and 24 with IPAA. There was no difference in sex and age between the two groups of patients. The number of rectal polyps was significantly different in the two groups. Immediate postoperative complications were observed in only five IPAA patients, three of whom (12%) required reoperation. Late postoperative complications occurred more frequently in IRA patients (14%) than in IPAA patients (4%). Desmoids developed in both groups (five in the IRA group and four in IPAA group). The number of bowel movements was similar in both groups, but 25% of IPAA patients complained of nocturnal fecal soiling. Fulguration or polypectomy for recurrent polyps was necessary in all but two IRA patients at follow-up. The rectal stump was easily eradicated by polyps in all but four patients with minute polyps at surgery. In the latter patients a diffuse or carpeting rectal polyposis occurred. IPAA can give optimum control of colorectal polyposis in FAP patients with an acceptable incidence of postoperative complications and satisfactory functional results. This type of surgical procedure is indicated in most FAP patients, and IRA should be reserved for patients without polyps or with fewer than 10 polyps in the rectal stump; otherwise growth of polyps cannot be adequately controlled.

摘要

家族性腺瘤性息肉病(FAP)的外科治疗仍存在争议。自1984年起,我们对全结肠切除回肠直肠吻合术(IRA)和保留直肠的全结肠切除回肠贮袋肛管吻合术(IPAA)进行了前瞻性评估,以确定术后并发症、功能结果、硬纤维瘤的发生情况以及直肠残端息肉复发方面的差异。IRA在腹膜返折以下进行,适用于无直肠癌且直肠黏膜最后10 cm息肉少于10个或为微小息肉病的情况。IRA患者接受定期内镜随访并长期服用舒林酸(每日2次,每次100 mg)。当不符合IRA标准时,则采用在齿状线处手工吻合的方式进行IPAA手术。14例患者接受了IRA手术,24例接受了IPAA手术。两组患者在性别和年龄方面无差异。两组患者的直肠息肉数量有显著差异。仅5例IPAA患者出现了术后即刻并发症,其中3例(12%)需要再次手术。IRA患者术后晚期并发症的发生率(14%)高于IPAA患者(4%)。两组均出现了硬纤维瘤(IRA组5例,IPAA组4例)。两组的排便次数相似,但25%的IPAA患者抱怨夜间粪便污染。随访时,除2例IRA患者外,其余所有患者均需对复发息肉进行电灼或息肉切除术。除4例手术时为微小息肉的患者外,其余患者的直肠残端息肉均易于切除。在这4例患者中,出现了弥漫性或地毯样直肠息肉病。IPAA能够在术后并发症发生率可接受且功能结果令人满意的情况下,对FAP患者的结直肠息肉病进行最佳控制。这种手术方式适用于大多数FAP患者,IRA应仅保留给直肠残端无息肉或息肉少于10个的患者;否则息肉的生长无法得到充分控制。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验