Guo Tian, Marquart-Pyatt Sandra, Ulbrich Tayler, Doll Julie E, Wilke Brook, Robertson G Philip
Department of Human Dimensions of Natural Resources, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, USA.
Department of Geography, Environment, and Spatial Sciences, Department of Political Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA.
J Environ Qual. 2025 Sep-Oct;54(5):1202-1213. doi: 10.1002/jeq2.20676. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
Agricultural researchers are increasingly encouraged to engage with stakeholders to improve the usefulness of their projects, but iterative research on the design and assessment of stakeholder engagement is scarce. The USDA Long-Term Agroecosystem Research (LTAR) Network recognizes the importance of effective engagement in increasing the utility of information and technologies for future agriculture. Diverse stakeholders and researchers at the Kellogg Biological Station (KBS) LTAR site co-designed the KBS LTAR Aspirational Cropping System Experiment, a process that provides a testing ground and interdisciplinary collaborations to develop theory-driven assessment protocols for continuous stakeholder engagement. Informed by prior work, we designed an assessment protocol that aims to measure participant preferences, experiences, and perceived benefits at various stages of this long-term project. Two online surveys were conducted in 2021 and 2022 among participants of LTAR engagement events at KBS, using a pre-post design, resulting in 125 total responses. Survey respondents had positive perceptions of the collaboratively designed research experiment. They had a strong expectation that the research would generate conservation and environmental advances while also informing policy and programs. Respondents also indicated a desire to network with other stakeholders. The research team noted the significant role of a long-term stakeholder engagement specialist in inviting participants from diverse backgrounds and creating an open and engaging experience. Overall, results highlight an interdisciplinary path of intentional and iterative engagement and evaluation to build a program that is adaptive and responsive to stakeholder needs.
农业研究人员越来越多地被鼓励与利益相关者合作,以提高其项目的实用性,但关于利益相关者参与的设计和评估的迭代研究却很少。美国农业部长期农业生态系统研究(LTAR)网络认识到有效参与对于提高信息和技术对未来农业的效用的重要性。凯洛格生物站(KBS)LTAR站点的不同利益相关者和研究人员共同设计了KBS LTAR理想种植系统实验,这一过程提供了一个试验场和跨学科合作,以开发理论驱动的评估方案,用于持续的利益相关者参与。基于先前的工作,我们设计了一个评估方案,旨在衡量该长期项目各个阶段参与者的偏好、经验和感知收益。2021年和2022年,我们对KBS LTAR参与活动的参与者进行了两次在线调查,采用前后设计,共收到125份回复。调查对象对共同设计的研究实验有积极看法。他们强烈期望该研究能在促进保护和环境进步的同时,为政策和项目提供信息。受访者还表示希望与其他利益相关者建立联系。研究团队指出,长期利益相关者参与专家在邀请不同背景的参与者并创造开放且有吸引力的体验方面发挥了重要作用。总体而言,研究结果突出了一条有意且迭代的参与和评估的跨学科路径,以建立一个能适应并响应利益相关者需求的项目。