Grover Sandeep, Avasthi Ajit, Chakravarty Rahul, Dan Amitava, Chakraborty Kaustav, Neogi Rajarishi, Desouza Avinash, Nayak Omkar, Praharaj Samir Kumar, Menon Vikas, Deep Raman, Bathla Manish, Subramanyam Alka A, Nebhinani Naresh, Ghosh Prosenjit, Lakdawala Bhavesh, Bhattacharya Ranjan
Department of Psychiatry, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Psychiatry, Burdwan Medical College and Hospital, Burdwan, West Bengal, India.
Indian J Psychiatry. 2024 Nov;66(11):1036-1042. doi: 10.4103/indianjpsychiatry.indianjpsychiatry_499_24. Epub 2024 Nov 16.
There is lack of data on bipolar disorder (BD) type II from India.
To compare the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with BD-I and BD-II using the data of the Bipolar Disorder Course and Outcome study from India (BiD-CoIN study).
Using the data of the BiD-CoIN study, patients with BD-I and BD-II were compared for demographic and clinical variables.
Out of the 773 patients, 59 (7.63%) participants had BD-II. Compared to BD-I, patients with BD-II had a higher income; were more often unemployed or housewives; had a higher mean number of episodes per year of illness, higher severity of depressive episodes, higher depressive affective morbidity, and a higher number of hypomanic episodes (in the lifetime, and number of episodes per year of illness); received lower doses of lithium and a lower number of medications; and had lower prevalence of alcohol dependence, higher prevalence of seasonality, a high proportion of them sought faith healing treatment, and a higher proportion of them have predominant depressive polarity.
Patients with BD-I and BD-II differ from each other on certain demographic and clinical variables. The difference in the clinical variables suggests that the patients with BD-II may require different treatment approaches for management.
印度缺乏关于双相情感障碍II型(BD-II)的数据。
利用印度双相情感障碍病程与转归研究(BiD-CoIN研究)的数据,比较双相情感障碍I型(BD-I)和双相情感障碍II型患者的人口统计学和临床特征。
利用BiD-CoIN研究的数据,对BD-I和BD-II患者的人口统计学和临床变量进行比较。
在773例患者中,59例(7.63%)为BD-II。与BD-I相比,BD-II患者收入更高;更多为失业者或家庭主妇;每年疾病发作的平均次数更多,抑郁发作的严重程度更高,抑郁情感发病率更高,轻躁狂发作次数更多(终生及每年疾病发作次数);接受的锂盐剂量更低,用药数量更少;酒精依赖患病率更低,季节性患病率更高,其中很大一部分寻求信仰疗法治疗,且很大一部分以抑郁极性为主。
BD-I和BD-II患者在某些人口统计学和临床变量上存在差异。临床变量的差异表明,BD-II患者可能需要不同的治疗方法来进行管理。