• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

促进转化研究中的多学科工作小组:促进跨中心合作及维持癌症中心戒烟倡议联盟的策略。

Facilitating multidisciplinary working groups in translational research: Strategies to promote cross-center collaboration and sustain the Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Consortium.

作者信息

Minion Mara, Rolland Betsy

机构信息

Center for Tobacco Research & Intervention, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 15;8(1):e216. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.653. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1017/cts.2024.653
PMID:39790472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11713431/
Abstract

As funding for large translational research consortia increases across the National Institutes of Health (NIH), focused working groups provide an opportunity to leverage the power of unique networks to conduct high-impact science and offer a strategy for building collaborative infrastructure to sustain networks long-term. This sustainment leverages the existing NIH investments, amplifying the impact and creating conditions for future innovative translational research. However, few resources exist that detail practical strategies for establishing and sustaining working groups in consortia. Here, we describe how the Coordinating Center for the National Cancer Institute-funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative (C3I) utilized principles derived from the Science of Team Science to develop replicable strategies for building and sustaining an effective working group-led consortium. These strategies include continually engaging community members in strategic planning, prioritizing diversity in leadership and membership, creating multi-level opportunities for leadership and participation, providing intensive community management and facilitation, and incentivizing projects that support the consortium sustainment. When assessing the impact of these interventions through qualitative exit interviews, four key themes emerged: through the C3I working group consortium, members co-created new dissemination products, gained new insights and innovations, enhanced local program implementation, and invested in cross-network collaboration to support sustained engagement in the initiative.

摘要

随着美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)对大型转化研究联盟的资助增加,专注的工作组提供了一个机会,利用独特网络的力量开展具有高影响力的科学研究,并提供一种建立协作基础设施以长期维持网络的策略。这种维持利用了NIH现有的投资,扩大了影响,并为未来的创新转化研究创造了条件。然而,很少有资源详细介绍在联盟中建立和维持工作组的实用策略。在这里,我们描述了美国国立癌症研究所资助的癌症中心戒烟倡议(C3I)协调中心如何利用团队科学的原则制定可复制的策略,以建立和维持一个由有效工作组主导的联盟。这些策略包括让社区成员持续参与战略规划、在领导层和成员中优先考虑多样性、创造多层次的领导和参与机会、提供密集的社区管理和促进,并激励支持联盟维持的项目。通过定性离职访谈评估这些干预措施的影响时,出现了四个关键主题:通过C3I工作组联盟,成员共同创造了新的传播产品,获得了新的见解和创新,加强了地方项目的实施,并投资于跨网络合作以支持对该倡议的持续参与。

相似文献

1
Facilitating multidisciplinary working groups in translational research: Strategies to promote cross-center collaboration and sustain the Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Consortium.促进转化研究中的多学科工作小组:促进跨中心合作及维持癌症中心戒烟倡议联盟的策略。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Nov 15;8(1):e216. doi: 10.1017/cts.2024.653. eCollection 2024.
2
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.卡塔尔国重症监护网络。
Qatar Med J. 2019 Nov 7;2019(2):2. doi: 10.5339/qmj.2019.qccc.2. eCollection 2019.
3
Using information technology to integrate tobacco use treatment in routine oncology care: Lessons learned from the U.S. Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Cancer Centers.利用信息技术将烟草使用治疗纳入常规肿瘤护理:美国癌症中心戒烟倡议癌症中心的经验教训。
Implement Res Pract. 2023 Jul 7;4:26334895231185374. doi: 10.1177/26334895231185374. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
4
Embedding research codesign knowledge and practice: Learnings from researchers in a new research institute in Australia.融入研究协同设计知识与实践:来自澳大利亚一家新研究机构研究人员的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2022 Dec 7;8(1):71. doi: 10.1186/s40900-022-00392-4.
5
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
6
A mixed-methods analysis to understand the implementation of a multistakeholder research consortium: Environmental influences on child health outcomes (ECHO).一项旨在了解多利益相关方研究联盟实施情况的混合方法分析:环境对儿童健康结果的影响(ECHO)
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Aug 29;7(1):e198. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.620. eCollection 2023.
7
Sustaining capacity building and evidence-based NCD intervention implementation: Perspectives from the GRIT consortium.维持能力建设和基于证据的非传染性疾病干预措施实施:GRIT 联盟的观点
Front Health Serv. 2022 Jul 22;2:891522. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2022.891522. eCollection 2022.
8
Utilizing the Un-Meeting model to advance innovative translational and team science.利用非会议模式推动创新的转化科学和团队科学。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jul 10;7(1):e176. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.576. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluating efforts to diversify the biomedical workforce: the role and function of the Coordination and Evaluation Center of the Diversity Program Consortium.评估生物医学劳动力多元化的努力:多样性项目联盟协调与评估中心的作用和职能。
BMC Proc. 2017 Dec 4;11(Suppl 12):27. doi: 10.1186/s12919-017-0087-4. eCollection 2017.
10
Creating research-ready partnerships: the initial development of seven implementation laboratories to advance cancer control.创建研究就绪的合作伙伴关系:为推进癌症控制而初步建立的七个实施实验室。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 21;23(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09128-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of team science best practices to the project management of a large, multi-site lung cancer screening research consortium.将团队科学最佳实践应用于大型多中心肺癌筛查研究联盟的项目管理。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Jun 5;7(1):e145. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.566. eCollection 2023.
2
Evaluation of a clinical and translational research initiative: Developing and implementing a collaborative evaluation process in CAIRIBU.一项临床与转化研究计划的评估:在CAIRIBU中制定并实施协作评估流程
J Clin Transl Sci. 2023 Feb 8;7(1):e68. doi: 10.1017/cts.2023.12. eCollection 2023.
3
Coordinating Centers as a Strategy for Accelerating Cancer Epidemiology Consortia: Best Practices.
作为加速癌症流行病学联盟战略的协调中心:最佳实践
Curr Epidemiol Rep. 2022;9(1):1-9. doi: 10.1007/s40471-022-00282-z. Epub 2022 Feb 21.
4
Introduction to the Cancer Center Cessation Initiative Working Groups: Improving Oncology Care and Outcomes by Including Tobacco Treatment.癌症中心戒烟倡议工作组简介:通过纳入烟草治疗改善肿瘤护理及治疗效果
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2021 Nov;19(Suppl_1):S1-S3. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7095.
5
Enhancing reproducibility using interprofessional team best practices.利用跨专业团队的最佳实践提高可重复性。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2020 Jul 16;5(1):e20. doi: 10.1017/cts.2020.512.
6
Tobacco Treatment Program Implementation at NCI Cancer Centers: Progress of the NCI Cancer Moonshot-Funded Cancer Center Cessation Initiative.美国国家癌症研究所癌症中心的烟草治疗计划实施情况:美国国家癌症研究所“癌症登月”资助的癌症中心戒烟倡议的进展。
Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2019 Nov;12(11):735-740. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-19-0182. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Addressing Challenges in Converting Grant-Funded Infrastructures to Broadly Used Research Resources.解决将资助基础设施转化为广泛使用的研究资源所面临的挑战。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2019 Oct;28(10):1559-1562. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-19-0043. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
8
How fun are your meetings? Investigating the relationship between humor patterns in team interactions and team performance.你们的会议有趣吗?探究团队互动中的幽默模式与团队绩效之间的关系。
J Appl Psychol. 2014 Nov;99(6):1278-87. doi: 10.1037/a0038083. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
9
Coordinating centers in cancer epidemiology research: the Asia Cohort Consortium coordinating center.癌症流行病学研究协调中心:亚洲队列联盟协调中心。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011 Oct;20(10):2115-9. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-11-0391. Epub 2011 Jul 29.
10
Cognition-based and affect-based trust as mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance.基于认知和基于情感的信任作为领导行为对团队绩效影响的中介。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 Jul;96(4):863-71. doi: 10.1037/a0022625.