Suppr超能文献

一项探讨治疗犬干预对住院老年人孤独感影响的试点随机对照试验。

A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial to Examine the Impact of a Therapy Dog Intervention on Loneliness in Hospitalized Older Adults.

作者信息

Gee Nancy R, Townsend Lisa, Friedmann Erika, Barker Sandra B, Mueller Megan K

机构信息

Center for Human-Animal Interaction, Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Department of Organizational Systems and Adult Health, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Innov Aging. 2024 Sep 16;8(11):igae085. doi: 10.1093/geroni/igae085. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Loneliness is linked to significant health threats and is potentially more dangerous than obesity; it affects as many as 29% of noninstitutionalized older adults. Loneliness is exacerbated for those who require inpatient rehabilitation, are displaced from their social networks, spend little time receiving therapy, and are physically inactive and socially isolated. Emerging evidence suggests that companion animals provide a number of health and well-being benefits and that interacting with a trained therapy dog may reduce loneliness.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Older adult (59+ years) medical inpatients ( = 42) were randomly assigned to receive 1 of 3 conditions: dog and handler interaction (animal-assisted interaction [AAI]), handler only conversational control (CC), or usual care (UC) for 20 min per day over 3 days. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) and Short Form (UCLA-SF) as well as an analog rating scale were used to assess loneliness. Linear mixed models with random intercepts were applied to examine differences in the changes from before to after the conditions.

RESULTS

Changes in the UCLA-SF [ (200.356) = 1.851,  = .033] and the analog loneliness scale [ (194.407) = 2.651,  = .004], differed significantly between the AAI condition and the UC conditions but not between the CC and UC conditions ( = .175). Trajectories of changes in loneliness showed more improvement in the AAI than in the UC condition.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

These results indicate that AAI was effective for reducing loneliness in hospitalized older adults. Human handler only visits did not result in similar findings, indicating that there is something unique and beneficial about the presence of the dog.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05089201.

摘要

背景与目的

孤独与重大健康威胁相关,其潜在危险性可能超过肥胖;多达29%的非机构化老年人受其影响。对于那些需要住院康复、脱离社交网络、接受治疗时间短、身体不活动且社交孤立的人来说,孤独感会加剧。新出现的证据表明,伴侣动物能带来诸多健康和幸福益处,与经过训练的治疗犬互动可能会减轻孤独感。

研究设计与方法

将老年(59岁及以上)住院患者(n = 42)随机分为三组,分别接受以下三种情况之一:与狗及训练员互动(动物辅助互动[AAI])、仅由训练员进行对话控制(CC)或常规护理(UC),为期3天,每天20分钟。使用加利福尼亚大学洛杉矶分校孤独量表(UCLA - LS)及其简表(UCLA - SF)以及一个模拟评分量表来评估孤独感。应用具有随机截距的线性混合模型来检验不同情况前后变化的差异。

结果

UCLA - SF的变化[F(200.356)=1.851,P = 0.033]以及模拟孤独感量表的变化[F(194.407)=2.651,P = 0.004]在AAI组和UC组之间存在显著差异,但在CC组和UC组之间无显著差异(P = 0.175)。孤独感变化轨迹显示,AAI组比UC组有更大改善。

讨论与启示

这些结果表明,AAI对减轻住院老年人的孤独感有效。仅由人类训练员探访未得出类似结果,这表明狗的存在具有独特且有益之处。

临床试验注册

NCT05089201。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dbe/11714157/d785c6fa9403/igae085_fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验