• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医疗环境中武器的流行情况:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。

Prevalence of Weapons in the Health Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

McGuire Sarayna S, Clements Casey M, Gerberi Dana J, Murad M Hassan

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

Mayo Clinic Libraries, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024 Dec 14;9(1):100587. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.11.004. eCollection 2025 Feb.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.11.004
PMID:39790859
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11713507/
Abstract

This study aimed to systematicically evaluate and quantify the prevalence of weapons in the health care setting. A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and EBSCO MegaFILE was performed from inception to January 12, 2024. The primary outcome was the prevalence of weapons in the health care setting on patients and/or visitors. Prevalence was pooled across studies and estimated using a random effects model. Subgroup analyses were done based on types of weapons, characteristics of weapon carriers, weapons screening/detection technology, and screened population characteristics. A total of 14 observational studies were included. All studies were from the United States and were published between 1984 and 2023. Weapons prevalence ranged from 0.4% to 26.3% among populations screened in the included studies. The overall pooled weapons prevalence was 4.0% (95% CI, 2.0%-7.8%). Most weapons were bladed (3.8%; 95% CI, 1.5%-8.9%), followed by other weapons (0.6%; 95% CI, 0.3%-1.3%), and firearms (0.1%; 95% CI, 0.02%-0.5%; <.01). Weapons prevalence was 2.0% (95% CI, 0.7%-5.8%) among individuals entering the hospital setting, compared with 1.6% (95% CI, 0.7%-3.4%) of individuals entering the emergency department and highest (24.3%; 95% CI, 21.6%-27.2%) when major trauma patients were hand-searched. Prevalence was higher in males than that in females (11.1% vs 3.1%; =.01). Weapons should be expected on individuals presenting to hospitals in the United States; however, prevalence varied widely based on the setting, type of patients, and detection method.

摘要

本研究旨在系统评估和量化医疗环境中武器的流行情况。对MEDLINE、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science、CINAHL和EBSCO MegaFILE进行了从数据库建立到2024年1月12日的系统检索。主要结果是医疗环境中患者和/或访客携带武器的流行情况。对各研究的流行率进行汇总,并使用随机效应模型进行估计。根据武器类型、武器携带者特征、武器筛查/检测技术以及筛查人群特征进行亚组分析。共纳入14项观察性研究。所有研究均来自美国,发表时间为1984年至2023年。在所纳入研究中接受筛查的人群中,武器流行率在0.4%至26.3%之间。总体汇总武器流行率为4.0%(95%置信区间,2.0%-7.8%)。大多数武器为带刃武器(3.8%;95%置信区间,1.5%-8.9%),其次是其他武器(0.6%;95%置信区间,0.3%-1.3%),枪支最少(0.1%;95%置信区间,0.02%-0.5%;P<.01)。进入医院的人群中武器流行率为2.0%(95%置信区间,0.7%-5.8%),而进入急诊科的人群中为1.6%(95%置信区间,0.7%-3.4%),对手部受伤患者进行人工搜查时流行率最高(24.3%;95%置信区间,21.6%-27.2%)。男性的流行率高于女性(11.1%对3.1%;P=.01)。在美国,前往医院的人员携带武器的情况是可以预期的;然而,流行率因环境、患者类型和检测方法的不同而有很大差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/0b0ae307e5aa/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/bb01e5564ece/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/fb6a51d5a6d5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/7da7d413bdd8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/0b0ae307e5aa/gr4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/bb01e5564ece/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/fb6a51d5a6d5/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/7da7d413bdd8/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f0f9/11713507/0b0ae307e5aa/gr4.jpg

相似文献

1
Prevalence of Weapons in the Health Care Setting: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.医疗环境中武器的流行情况:一项系统评价与荟萃分析。
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2024 Dec 14;9(1):100587. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2024.11.004. eCollection 2025 Feb.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Deployment of personnel to military operations: impact on mental health and social functioning.人员部署到军事行动中:对心理健康和社会功能的影响。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jun 1;14(1):1-127. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.6. eCollection 2018.
4
One year of passive weapons detection and deterrence at an academic emergency department: A mixed-methods study.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;89:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.021. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
5
Mortality and its determinants among patients attending in emergency departments.急诊科就诊患者的死亡率及其决定因素。
BMC Emerg Med. 2024 Jul 19;24(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-01050-6.
6
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
7
Community-based care for the specialized management of heart failure: an evidence-based analysis.基于社区的心力衰竭专科管理:一项循证分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(17):1-42. Epub 2009 Nov 1.
8
Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.全球儿童 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病视网膜病变的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Mar 1;6(3):e231887. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.1887.
9
Prevalence of long-term physical sequelae among patients treated with multi-drug and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.接受多药和广泛耐药结核病治疗患者的长期身体后遗症患病率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
EClinicalMedicine. 2023 Mar 10;57:101900. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101900. eCollection 2023 Mar.
10
Behavioural interventions for type 2 diabetes: an evidence-based analysis.2型糖尿病的行为干预:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2009;9(21):1-45. Epub 2009 Oct 1.

本文引用的文献

1
One year of passive weapons detection and deterrence at an academic emergency department: A mixed-methods study.
Am J Emerg Med. 2025 Mar;89:57-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.12.021. Epub 2024 Dec 12.
2
Impact of Implementation of a New Weapons Screening at an Urban Emergency Department.新武器筛查在城市急诊科实施的影响。
J Emerg Med. 2023 Dec;65(6):e594-e599. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
3
The Team Is Not Okay: Violence in Emergency Departments Across Disciplines in a Health System.团队不好了:卫生系统跨学科急诊部的暴力问题。
West J Emerg Med. 2023 Feb 1;24(2):169-177. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2022.9.57497.
4
Risk factors for workplace encounters with weapons by hospital employees.医院员工在工作场所遭遇武器的风险因素。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021 Mar 19;2:100105. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100105. eCollection 2021 Nov.
5
US doctors redouble calls for gun control after hospital shooting.
BMJ. 2022 Jun 7;377:o1412. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o1412.
6
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
7
U.S. acute care hospital shootings, 2012-2016: A content analysis study.2012 - 2016年美国急症护理医院枪击事件:一项内容分析研究。
Work. 2019;64(1):77-83. doi: 10.3233/WOR-192970.
8
Dangerous weapons confiscated after implementation of routine screening across a healthcare system.在整个医疗系统实施常规筛查后,危险武器被没收。
Am J Emerg Med. 2018 Aug;36(8):1505-1507. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.12.043. Epub 2017 Dec 20.
9
De-duplication of database search results for systematic reviews in EndNote.在EndNote中对系统评价的数据库搜索结果进行去重。
J Med Libr Assoc. 2016 Jul;104(3):240-3. doi: 10.3163/1536-5050.104.3.014.
10
Workplace Violence against Health Care Workers in the United States.美国针对医护人员的职场暴力
N Engl J Med. 2016 Apr 28;374(17):1661-9. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1501998.