Zhou Ziwei, Huang Yiquan, Zhuang Xiaodong, Guo Yue, Xie Peihan, Xiong Zhenyu, Liu Menghui, Zhang Wenjing, Zhong Junqi, Li Yi, Liao Xinxue
Department of Cardiology The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China.
NHC Key Laboratory of Assisted Circulation Sun Yat-sen University Guangzhou China.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 Jan 21;14(2):e034626. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.034626. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy (CAN) is a severe complication of type 2 diabetes. Significant sex-related differences have been observed in type 2 diabetes consequences such as mortality. However, the effect of sex on the association between CAN and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes is currently unknown.
We assessed 7866 participants in the ACCORD (Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes) trial, including 4730 men and 3136 women. CAN was diagnosed using a combination of heart rate variability and QT interval index, which has 3 different definitions. There were 1364 cases of all-cause mortality and 452 cases of cardiovascular disease mortality during a median follow-up of 9.7 years. We used multivariable Cox regression models to assess the association between different CAN definitions and mortality. In women, various CAN measures were statistically significant associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (CAN1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.64 [95% CI, 1.28-2.09]; CAN2: HR, 1.58 [95% CI, 1.17-2.15]; CAN3: HR, 1.78 [95% CI, 1.20-2.65]) and mortality (CAN1: HR, 2.25 [95% CI, 1.44-3.52]; CAN 2: HR, 2.22 [95% CI, 1.28-3.87]; CAN3: HR, 3.31 [95% CI, 1.67-6.57]). CAN was not significantly associated with mortality in men. A significant multiplicative interaction of CAN and sex was observed on both mortality outcomes (<0.01).
Significant sex-related differences were observed in CAN and its associated mortality. In terms of mortality risk prevention, CAN should be given greater consideration in women with type 2 diabetes.
心血管自主神经病变(CAN)是2型糖尿病的一种严重并发症。在2型糖尿病的后果如死亡率方面已观察到显著的性别差异。然而,性别对2型糖尿病患者中CAN与死亡率之间关联的影响目前尚不清楚。
我们评估了糖尿病心血管风险控制行动(ACCORD)试验中的7866名参与者,其中包括4730名男性和3136名女性。CAN通过心率变异性和QT间期指数相结合来诊断,有3种不同的定义。在中位随访9.7年期间,有1364例全因死亡病例和452例心血管疾病死亡病例。我们使用多变量Cox回归模型来评估不同CAN定义与死亡率之间的关联。在女性中,各种CAN测量指标与全因死亡风险增加在统计学上显著相关(CAN1:风险比[HR],1.64[95%置信区间,1.28 - 2.09];CAN2:HR,1.58[95%置信区间,1.17 - 2.15];CAN3:HR,1.78[95%置信区间,1.20 - 2.65])以及与心血管疾病死亡风险增加在统计学上显著相关(CAN1:HR,2.25[95%置信区间,1.44 - 3.52];CAN2:HR,2.22[95%置信区间,1.28 - 3.87];CAN3:HR,3.31[95%置信区间,1.67 - 6.57])。CAN与男性死亡率无显著关联。在两种死亡结局方面均观察到CAN与性别的显著相乘交互作用(<0.01)。
在CAN及其相关死亡率方面观察到显著的性别差异。在死亡率风险预防方面,2型糖尿病女性患者应更重视CAN。