• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中,将以患者为中心的结果指标与个人轮椅预算流程相结合使用:一种混合方法,用于探索使用WATCh和WATCh-Ad的工作人员和服务使用者的体验。

Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad.

作者信息

Tuersley Lorna, Quaye Naa Amua, Pisavadia Kalpa, Edwards Rhiannon Tudor, Bray Nathan

机构信息

Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation (CHEME), School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.

Academy for Health Equity, Prevention and Wellbeing (AHEPW) School of Health Sciences, Bangor University, Gwynedd, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):e0312967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312967. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312967
PMID:39792936
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11723643/
Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Personal wheelchair budgets (PWBs) are offered to everyone in England eligible for a wheelchair provided through the National Health Service (NHS) to support their choice of equipment. The WATCh (Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children) and related WATCh-Ad for adults are patient-centred outcome measures (PCOMs) developed to help individual users express their main outcome needs when obtaining a wheelchair and rate their satisfaction with subsequent outcomes after receiving their equipment. Use was explored in a real-world setting, aiming to produce guidance for use alongside the PWB process.

METHODS

Three wheelchair service provider organisations across four sites participated. Staff and users completed surveys about their experience of assessments using the WATCh and/or WATCh-Ad. Selected patients were interviewed after receipt of their equipment, and staff were interviewed after experiencing a number of assessments. Thematic analysis was undertaken using the tool, survey and interview data. Results of pre- and post-equipment provision were presented graphically.

RESULTS

Information on 75 assessments by 15 staff was obtained. Three-quarters of users or their carers rated the use of the tools in the assessment process as 'helpful' or 'very helpful'. Staff reported that the WATCh or WATCh-Ad had been considered 'useful' in developing individual care plans in around 1 in 3 cases and affected the prescription in 1 in 4 cases. Concerns were expressed about the length of time taken to administer the tools in clinic. However, some staff noted this reduced with more hands-on experience and by providing the tools to users in advance of the appointment.

CONCLUSIONS

The WATCh and WATCh-Ad PCOMs are suitable for routine use by wheelchair service providers to assist the assessment process. It is recommended that tool materials are provided in advance to users/carers and that staff are allowed time to develop their ways of working with them.

摘要

背景与目的

在英格兰,个人轮椅预算(PWBs)提供给所有有资格通过国民医疗服务体系(NHS)获得轮椅的人,以支持他们选择设备。儿童轮椅结果评估工具(WATCh)及相关的成人版WATCh-Ad是以患者为中心的结果测量工具(PCOMs),旨在帮助个体用户在获取轮椅时表达其主要结果需求,并对收到设备后的后续结果满意度进行评分。在实际环境中对其使用情况进行了探索,旨在生成与个人轮椅预算流程配套使用的指南。

方法

来自四个地点的三家轮椅服务提供商组织参与其中。工作人员和用户完成了关于使用WATCh和/或WATCh-Ad进行评估的经验的调查。部分选定患者在收到设备后接受了访谈,工作人员在经历多次评估后接受了访谈。使用该工具、调查和访谈数据进行了主题分析。以图表形式呈现了设备提供前后的结果。

结果

获得了15名工作人员进行的75次评估的信息。四分之三的用户或其护理人员将工具在评估过程中的使用评为“有帮助”或“非常有帮助”。工作人员报告称,在约三分之一的案例中,WATCh或WATCh-Ad被认为在制定个人护理计划方面“有用”,在四分之一的案例中影响了处方。有人对在诊所使用这些工具所需的时间长度表示担忧。然而,一些工作人员指出,随着实践经验的增加以及在预约前向用户提供这些工具,所需时间会减少。

结论

WATCh和WATCh-Ad PCOMs适用于轮椅服务提供商的常规使用,以协助评估过程。建议提前向用户/护理人员提供工具材料,并给予工作人员时间来改进使用这些工具的工作方式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/1816edba47f8/pone.0312967.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/8e3fced0acab/pone.0312967.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/493a6cec480b/pone.0312967.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/204aea6e7222/pone.0312967.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/3efa78745ea4/pone.0312967.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/1816edba47f8/pone.0312967.g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/8e3fced0acab/pone.0312967.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/493a6cec480b/pone.0312967.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/204aea6e7222/pone.0312967.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/3efa78745ea4/pone.0312967.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/875e/11723643/1816edba47f8/pone.0312967.g005.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of patient-centred outcome measures alongside the personal wheelchair budget process in NHS England: A mixed methods approach to exploring the staff and service user experience of using the WATCh and WATCh-Ad.在英国国家医疗服务体系(NHS)中,将以患者为中心的结果指标与个人轮椅预算流程相结合使用:一种混合方法,用于探索使用WATCh和WATCh-Ad的工作人员和服务使用者的体验。
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 10;20(1):e0312967. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312967. eCollection 2025.
2
Development of the Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children (WATCh): A patient-centred outcome measure for young wheelchair users.《轮椅儿童结局评估工具(WATCh)的制定:为年轻轮椅使用者制定的以患者为中心的结局测量工具》
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209380. eCollection 2018.
3
Developing feasible person-centred care alternatives to emergency department responses for adults with epilepsy: a discrete choice analysis mixed-methods study.为癫痫成人制定可行的以患者为中心的护理替代急诊治疗方案:一项离散选择分析混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Aug;12(24):1-158. doi: 10.3310/HKQW4129.
4
The impact of the World Health Organization 8-steps in wheelchair service provision in wheelchair users in a less resourced setting: a cohort study in Indonesia.世界卫生组织八项措施对资源匮乏地区轮椅使用者轮椅服务提供的影响:印度尼西亚的一项队列研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Jan 22;16:26. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1268-y.
5
Wheelchair satisfaction and recommended improvements of manual wheelchairs in the UK.英国轮椅满意度及手动轮椅的改进建议
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2025 Jan;20(1):163-170. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2024.2359473. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
6
Geospatial assistive technologies: potential usability criteria identified from manual wheelchair users.地理空间辅助技术:从手动轮椅使用者那里确定的潜在可用性标准。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2020 Nov;15(8):844-855. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1620351. Epub 2019 Jun 21.
7
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
8
Modelling tool to support decision-making in the NHS Health Check programme: workshops, systematic review and co-production with users.用于支持国民保健制度健康检查计划决策的建模工具:研讨会、系统评价以及与用户的共同制作。
Health Technol Assess. 2021 May;25(35):1-234. doi: 10.3310/hta25350.
9
A group intervention to improve quality of life for people with advanced dementia living in care homes: the Namaste feasibility cluster RCT.一项改善养老院中晚期痴呆症患者生活质量的团体干预措施:Namaste 可行性聚类 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jan;24(6):1-140. doi: 10.3310/hta24060.
10
Establishing user needs for a stability assessment tool to guide wheelchair prescription.确定用户对用于指导轮椅处方的稳定性评估工具的需求。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2017 Jan;12(1):47-55. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1063019. Epub 2015 Jul 3.

本文引用的文献

1
Preference-based measurement of mobility-related quality of life: developing the MobQoL-7D health state classification system.基于偏好的移动能力相关生活质量测量:开发 MobQoL-7D 健康状态分类系统。
Disabil Rehabil. 2022 Jun;44(12):2915-2929. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1844319. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
2
The Wheelchair Outcome Measure for Young People (WhOM-YP): modification and metrics for children and youth with mobility limitations.轮椅青年结局测量表(WhOM-YP):用于评估行动受限的儿童和青少年的修订版及指标。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Feb;17(2):192-200. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1774811. Epub 2020 Jun 13.
3
Face and content validity for the Wheelchair Satisfaction Questionnaire.
轮椅满意度问卷的表面效度和内容效度。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2021 Jul;16(5):545-549. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1684579. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
4
Development of the Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children (WATCh): A patient-centred outcome measure for young wheelchair users.《轮椅儿童结局评估工具(WATCh)的制定:为年轻轮椅使用者制定的以患者为中心的结局测量工具》
PLoS One. 2018 Dec 26;13(12):e0209380. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0209380. eCollection 2018.
5
Adaptation of the adult Functional Mobility Assessment (FMA) into a FMA-Family Centred (FMA-FC) paediatric version.将成人功能活动能力评估(FMA)改编为以家庭为中心的儿科版FMA(FMA-FC)。
Child Care Health Dev. 2018 Jul;44(4):630-635. doi: 10.1111/cch.12571. Epub 2018 May 15.
6
Test-retest reliability of the functional mobility assessment (FMA): a pilot study.功能活动能力评估(FMA)的重测信度:一项试点研究。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2013 May;8(3):213-9. doi: 10.3109/17483107.2012.688240. Epub 2012 May 22.
7
Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcome measure.测量轮椅干预效果:轮椅效果测量方法的制定
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007 Sep;2(5):275-85. doi: 10.1080/17483100701475863.
8
Implementation research in mental health services: an emerging science with conceptual, methodological, and training challenges.心理健康服务中的实施研究:一门新兴科学,面临概念、方法和培训方面的挑战。
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2009 Jan;36(1):24-34. doi: 10.1007/s10488-008-0197-4. Epub 2008 Dec 23.
9
Test-retest reliability and cross validation of the functioning everyday with a wheelchair instrument.轮椅日常功能测试的重测信度和交叉验证。
Assist Technol. 2007 Summer;19(2):61-77. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2007.10131866.
10
A comparison of goal attainment scaling and the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for paediatric rehabilitation research.目标达成标度法与加拿大职业表现测量法在儿科康复研究中的比较。
Pediatr Rehabil. 2006 Apr-Jun;9(2):149-57. doi: 10.1080/13638490500235581.