Hosseini Seyyed Ali, Servaes Stijn, Hall Brandon, Bhaduri Sourav, Rajan Archith, Rosa-Neto Pedro, Brem Steven, Loevner Laurie A, Mohan Suyash, Chawla Sanjeev
Translational Neuroimaging Laboratory, The McGill University Research Centre for Studies in Aging, Douglas Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC H4H 1R3, Canada.
Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC H3A 2B4, Canada.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 27;15(1):38. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010038.
: The accurate and early distinction of glioblastomas (GBMs) from single brain metastases (BMs) provides a window of opportunity for reframing treatment strategies enabling optimal and timely therapeutic interventions. We sought to leverage physiologically sensitive parameters derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC)-perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) along with machine learning-based methods to distinguish GBMs from single BMs. : Patients with histopathology-confirmed GBMs ( = 62) and BMs ( = 26) and exhibiting contrast-enhancing regions (CERs) underwent 3T anatomical imaging, DTI and DSC-PWI prior to treatment. Median values of mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy, linear, planar and spheric anisotropic coefficients, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) and maximum rCBV values were measured from CERs and immediate peritumor regions. Data normalization and scaling were performed. In the next step, most relevant features were extracted (non-interacting features), which were subsequently used to generate a set of new, innovative, high-order features (interacting features) using a feature engineering method. Finally, 10 machine learning classifiers were employed in distinguishing GBMs and BMs. Cross-validation and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to determine the diagnostic performance. : A random forest classifier with ANOVA F-value feature selection algorithm using both interacting and non-interacting features provided the best diagnostic performance in distinguishing GBMs from BMs with an area under the ROC curve of 92.67%, a classification accuracy of 87.8%, a sensitivity of 73.64% and a specificity of 97.5%. : A machine learning based approach involving the combined use of interacting and non-interacting physiological MRI parameters shows promise to differentiate between GBMs and BMs with high accuracy.
准确且早期地区分胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)与单发脑转移瘤(BM)为重新制定治疗策略提供了一个机会窗口,从而能够实现最佳且及时的治疗干预。我们试图利用源自扩散张量成像(DTI)和动态磁敏感对比(DSC)灌注加权成像(PWI)的生理敏感参数以及基于机器学习的方法来区分GBM与单发BM。:组织病理学确诊的GBM患者(n = 62)和BM患者(n = 26)且有强化区域(CER),在治疗前接受了3T解剖成像、DTI和DSC-PWI检查。从CER及其紧邻的瘤周区域测量平均扩散率(MD)、各向异性分数、线性、平面和球形各向异性系数以及相对脑血容量(rCBV)和最大rCBV值的中位数。进行了数据归一化和缩放。下一步,提取最相关的特征(非相互作用特征),随后使用特征工程方法将其用于生成一组新的、创新的高阶特征(相互作用特征)。最后,采用10种机器学习分类器来区分GBM和BM。进行交叉验证和受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定诊断性能。:使用相互作用和非相互作用特征的具有方差分析F值特征选择算法的随机森林分类器在区分GBM和BM方面具有最佳诊断性能,ROC曲线下面积为92.67%,分类准确率为87.8%,灵敏度为73.64%,特异性为97.5%。:一种基于机器学习的方法,涉及联合使用相互作用和非相互作用的生理MRI参数,有望高精度地区分GBM和BM。