Fritzsche Hagen, Pape Alexander, Schaser Klaus-Dieter, Beyer Franziska, Plodeck Verena, Hoffmann Ralf-Thorsten, Hahlbohm Patricia, Mehnert Elisabeth, Weidlich Anne
University Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Plastic Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany.
AG Knochentumoren e.V., CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Dec 29;15(1):63. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15010063.
The aim of this study was to compare the technique of navigation-assisted biopsy based on fused PET and MRI datasets to CT-guided biopsies in terms of the duration of the procedure, radiation dose, complication rate, and accuracy of the biopsy, particularly in anatomically complex regions. Between 2019 and 2022, retrospectively collected data included all navigated biopsies and CT-guided biopsies of suspected primary bone tumors or solitary metastases. Navigation was based on preoperative CT, PET-CT/-MRI, and MRI datasets, and tumor biopsies were performed using intraoperative 3D imaging combined with a navigation system. A total of 22 navigated (main group: m/f = 10/12, mean age: 56 yrs.) and 57 CT-guided biopsies (reference group: m/f = 36/21, mean age: 63 yrs.) were performed. Patients were grouped according to anatomic sites (pelvis, spine, extremities, thorax). The duration of the procedure in the reference group was significantly shorter than in the main group, particularly in the spine. The effective radiation dose was in the same range in both groups (main/reference group: 0.579 mSv and 0.687 mSv, respectively). In the reference group, a re-biopsy had to be performed in nine patients (diagnostic yield: 84%). A total of four major and three minor complications occurred in the reference group. Navigation-assisted percutaneous tumor biopsy resulted in correct, histologically useable diagnoses in all patients and reached a higher accuracy and first-time success rate (diagnostic yield: 100%) in comparison to CT-guided biopsies. The fusion of PET, CT, and MRI datasets enables us to combine anatomical with metabolic information. Consequently, target selection was improved, and the rate of false negative/low-grade sampling errors was decreased. Radiation exposure could be kept at a comparable level, and the durations of both procedures were comparable to conventional methods.
本研究的目的是比较基于PET与MRI融合数据集的导航辅助活检技术与CT引导活检技术在手术持续时间、辐射剂量、并发症发生率及活检准确性方面的差异,尤其是在解剖结构复杂的区域。2019年至2022年期间,回顾性收集的数据包括所有疑似原发性骨肿瘤或孤立性转移瘤的导航活检和CT引导活检。导航基于术前CT、PET-CT/-MRI和MRI数据集,肿瘤活检采用术中三维成像结合导航系统进行。共进行了22例导航活检(主要组:男/女 = 10/12,平均年龄:56岁)和57例CT引导活检(参照组:男/女 = 36/21,平均年龄:63岁)。患者根据解剖部位(骨盆、脊柱、四肢、胸部)分组。参照组的手术持续时间明显短于主要组,尤其是在脊柱部位。两组的有效辐射剂量处于相同范围(主要组/参照组分别为0.579 mSv和0.687 mSv)。在参照组中,9例患者需要再次活检(诊断率:84%)。参照组共发生4例主要并发症和3例次要并发症。与CT引导活检相比,导航辅助经皮肿瘤活检在所有患者中均获得了正确的、组织学上可用的诊断,且准确性和首次成功率更高(诊断率:100%)。PET、CT和MRI数据集的融合使我们能够将解剖信息与代谢信息相结合。因此,靶点选择得到改善,假阴性/低级别采样误差率降低。辐射暴露可保持在可比水平,两种手术的持续时间与传统方法相当。