Klaassen Laura, Christoffersen Tenna, Aaslyng Margit Dall, Tetens Inge
LUMC Center of Medicine for Older People, Leiden University, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Faculty of Science, University of Copenhagen, 1870 Frederiksberg, Denmark.
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 2;17(1):171. doi: 10.3390/nu17010171.
: Nutritional risks in older adults, such as malnutrition and sarcopenia, are often underdiagnosed. Screening practices frequently rely on Unplanned Weight Loss (UPWL), potentially overlooking at-risk individuals. This study aims to assess the prevalence of nutritional risk, identified by UPWL and sarcopenia, across different body mass index categories in a nursing home (NH) population. : Cross-sectional data were collected from an NH in a Danish municipality, including those of all self-reliant participants who consented and excluding those of terminally ill older adults. Data on age, sex, height, weight, and chronic diseases were extracted from medical records. Nutritional risk was assessed using two markers: a UPWL of ≥1 kg during the last six months and muscle strength via a modified 30 s chair stand test as a marker of sarcopenia. An ANOVA and Fisher's Exact Test were used to assess differences, followed by a post hoc Tukey test. : In our study of older adults ( = 93, mean age 83.2 ± 9.12 years, 63% female), 17 individuals (19%) had UPWL, and 27 (29%) had sarcopenia. Among those with obesity, twelve (48%) had sarcopenia, but only two (8%) had UPWL. In contrast, seven (21%) of those with normal weight had sarcopenia, while eleven (33%) experienced UPWL. : Older adults in NHs are at nutritional risk, but the prevalence varies significantly depending on whether UPWL or sarcopenia markers are applied for categorization. Sarcopenia prevalence was the highest in the obesity group, suggesting a need for integrating muscle strength or quantity assessments into community care to identify older adults at nutritional risk better.
老年人的营养风险,如营养不良和肌肉减少症,常常未被充分诊断。筛查方法通常依赖于非计划体重减轻(UPWL),这可能会忽略有风险的个体。本研究旨在评估养老院(NH)人群中,通过UPWL和肌肉减少症确定的不同体重指数类别下的营养风险患病率。:从丹麦一个市镇的一家养老院收集横断面数据,包括所有同意参与的自理参与者的数据,排除绝症老年人的数据。从医疗记录中提取年龄、性别、身高、体重和慢性病数据。使用两个指标评估营养风险:过去六个月内UPWL≥1千克,以及通过改良的30秒椅子站立测试评估肌肉力量作为肌肉减少症的指标。使用方差分析和费舍尔精确检验评估差异,随后进行事后图基检验。:在我们对老年人的研究中(n = 93,平均年龄83.2±9.12岁,63%为女性),17人(19%)有UPWL,27人(29%)有肌肉减少症。在肥胖者中,12人(48%)有肌肉减少症,但只有2人(8%)有UPWL。相比之下,体重正常者中有7人(21%)有肌肉减少症,而11人(33%)经历了UPWL。:养老院中的老年人存在营养风险,但根据使用UPWL还是肌肉减少症指标进行分类,患病率差异显著。肥胖组的肌肉减少症患病率最高,这表明需要将肌肉力量或数量评估纳入社区护理,以更好地识别有营养风险的老年人。