Shah Maulik P, Douglas Anne G, Sauer Brian M, Richie Megan B, Douglas Vanja C, Josephson S Andrew, Guterman Elan L
Department of Neurology, Weill Institute for Neurosciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Neurohospitalist. 2024 Oct;14(4):406-412. doi: 10.1177/19418744241273205. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Interhospital transfer is an important mechanism for improving access to specialized neurologic care but there are large gaps in our understanding of interhospital transfer for the management of non-stroke-related neurologic disease.
This observational study included consecutive patients admitted to an adult academic general neurology service via interhospital transfer from July 1, 2015 to July 1, 2017. Characteristics of the referring hospital and transferred patients were obtained through the American Hospital Association Directory, a hospital transfer database maintained by the accepting hospital, and the electronic medical record. The analyses used descriptive statistics to examine the cohort overall and compare characteristics of patients transferred from an emergency department and inpatient service.
504 patients were admitted via interhospital transfer during the study period. Of these, 395 patients (78.4%) were transferred because the referring hospital lacked capability, and 139 patients (27.6%) were transferred from an emergency department as opposed to inpatient service. Seizures was the most common diagnosis (23.8%). Patients who were transferred from an emergency department had a higher proportion covered by Medicaid (44.6%) than those transferred from an inpatient service (28.8%) and had a shorter median length of stay (3 days; IQR 2-7 vs 7 days; IQR 4-12).
The majority of observed interhospital non-stroke neurologic transfers occurred to improve access to specialized neurological care for patients, though patients transferred from the ED, as opposed to an inpatient service, had lower health care utilization, and this will be important to consider when developing systems of care and in future research.
医院间转运是改善获得专业神经科护理机会的重要机制,但我们对非中风相关神经疾病管理的医院间转运了解存在很大差距。
这项观察性研究纳入了2015年7月1日至2017年7月1日期间通过医院间转运入住成人学术性综合神经科服务的连续患者。转诊医院和转运患者的特征通过美国医院协会目录、接收医院维护的医院转运数据库以及电子病历获得。分析使用描述性统计来检查整个队列,并比较从急诊科和住院服务部门转运患者的特征。
在研究期间,504例患者通过医院间转运入院。其中,395例患者(78.4%)因转诊医院缺乏能力而被转运,139例患者(27.6%)从急诊科而非住院服务部门转运。癫痫发作是最常见的诊断(23.8%)。从急诊科转运的患者中医疗补助覆盖的比例(44.6%)高于从住院服务部门转运的患者(28.8%),且中位住院时间较短(3天;四分位间距2 - 7天对比7天;四分位间距4 - 12天)。
观察到的大多数医院间非中风神经科转运是为了改善患者获得专业神经科护理的机会,尽管从急诊科而非住院服务部门转运的患者医疗保健利用率较低,这在制定护理系统和未来研究时将是重要的考虑因素。