• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

合并症对肺癌筛查死亡率获益的影响:PLCO和NLST试验的事后分析

Impact of Comorbidities on the Mortality Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the PLCO and NLST Trials.

作者信息

Gendarme Sebastien, Irajizad Ehsan, Long James P, Fahrmann Johannes F, Dennison Jennifer B, Ghasemi Seyyed Mahmood, Dou Rongzhang, Volk Robert J, Meza Rafael, Toumazis Iakovos, Canoui-Poitrine Florence, Hanash Samir M, Ostrin Edwin J

机构信息

Department of Clinical Cancer Prevention, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Université Paris-Est-Créteil, Inserm, IMRB, Créteil, France.

Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.

出版信息

J Thorac Oncol. 2025 May;20(5):565-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Jan 9.

DOI:10.1016/j.jtho.2025.01.003
PMID:39798695
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12066220/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate how comorbidities affect mortality benefits of lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography.

METHODS

We developed a comorbidity index (Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian comorbidity index [PLCO-ci]) using LCS-eligible participants' data from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) trial (training set) and the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) (validation set). PLCO-ci predicts five-year non-lung cancer (LC) mortality using a regularized Cox model; with performance evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve. In NLST, LC mortality (per original publication) was compared between low-dose computed tomography and chest radiograph arms across the PLCO-ci quintile (Q1-5) using a cause-specific hazard ratio (csHR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Analyses included 34,690 PLCO and 53,452 NLST participants (mean age: 62 y [±5 y] and 61 y [±5 y], 58% and 59% male individuals, and 39% and 41% active smokers, respectively). PLCO-ci predicted five-year non-LC mortality with an area under the receiver operating characteristics curve of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.71-0.74) in PLCO and 0.69 (95% CI: 0.67-0.70) in NLST. In NLST, at a median follow-up of 6.5 years, LC mortality was significantly reduced for participants with intermediate comorbidity (Q2, Q3, and Q4): csHR 0.62 (95% CI: 0.41-0.95), 0.68 (95% CI: 0.48-0.96), and 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54-0.96) respectively, with a nonstatistically significant reduction for Q1 (csHR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.45-1.17) and no reduction for Q5 participants (csHR = 0.99, 95% CI: 0.79-1.23). Participants in Q2, Q3, and Q4 (60%) accounted for 89% of LC deaths averted among all NLST participants. Q1 participants had low LC incidence, whereas Q5 had higher localized LC lethality, more squamous cell carcinomas, and untreated LC.

CONCLUSIONS

The PLCO-ci developed in this work shows that individuals with intermediate comorbidity benefited the most from LCS, highlighting the need of addressing comorbidities to achieve LC mortality benefits.

摘要

目的

评估合并症如何影响低剂量计算机断层扫描肺癌筛查(LCS)的死亡率获益。

方法

我们利用前列腺、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌(PLCO)试验(训练集)和国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)(验证集)中符合LCS条件参与者的数据,开发了一种合并症指数(前列腺、肺、结直肠和卵巢合并症指数[PLCO-ci])。PLCO-ci使用正则化Cox模型预测五年非肺癌(LC)死亡率;使用受试者工作特征曲线下面积评估其性能。在NLST中,使用特定病因风险比(csHR)及95%置信区间(CI),比较低剂量计算机断层扫描组和胸部X光检查组在PLCO-ci五分位数(Q1-5)中的LC死亡率(根据原始出版物)。

结果

分析纳入了34,690名PLCO参与者和53,452名NLST参与者(平均年龄分别为62岁[±5岁]和61岁[±5岁],男性分别占58%和59%,现吸烟者分别占39%和41%)。PLCO-ci在PLCO中预测五年非LC死亡率的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.72(95%CI:0.71-0.74),在NLST中为0.69(95%CI:0.67-0.70)。在NLST中,中位随访6.5年时,合并症中等(Q2、Q3和Q4)的参与者LC死亡率显著降低:csHR分别为0.62(95%CI:0.41-0.95)、0.68(95%CI:0.48-0.96)和0.72(95%CI:0.54-0.96),Q1参与者降低不显著(csHR = 0.72,95%CI:0.45-1.17),Q5参与者未降低(csHR = 0.99,95%CI:0.79-1.23)。Q2、Q3和Q4的参与者(占60%)占所有NLST参与者中避免的LC死亡的89%。Q1参与者的LC发病率低,而Q5的局部LC致死率更高,鳞状细胞癌更多,且LC未得到治疗。

结论

本研究中开发的PLCO-ci表明,合并症中等的个体从LCS中获益最大,突出了处理合并症以实现LC死亡率获益的必要性。

相似文献

1
Impact of Comorbidities on the Mortality Benefits of Lung Cancer Screening: A Post-Hoc Analysis of the PLCO and NLST Trials.合并症对肺癌筛查死亡率获益的影响:PLCO和NLST试验的事后分析
J Thorac Oncol. 2025 May;20(5):565-576. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2025.01.003. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
2
Impact of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening on lung cancer-related mortality.低剂量计算机断层扫描(LDCT)筛查对肺癌相关死亡率的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 3;8(8):CD013829. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013829.pub2.
3
Screening for prostate cancer.前列腺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD004720. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004720.pub3.
4
Why Women Appear to Have Better Outcomes When Undergoing Screening for Lung Cancer.为什么女性在接受肺癌筛查时似乎有更好的结果。
Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2025 Jun;22(6):925-933. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.202408-863OC.
5
Management of people with early- or very early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: an attempted network meta-analysis.早期或极早期肝细胞癌患者的管理:一项网络荟萃分析尝试
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 28;3(3):CD011650. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011650.pub2.
6
Screening for lung cancer.肺癌筛查
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jun 21;2013(6):CD001991. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001991.pub3.
7
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
8
Guaiac-based faecal occult blood tests versus faecal immunochemical tests for colorectal cancer screening in average-risk individuals.基于愈创木脂的粪便潜血试验与粪便免疫化学试验用于一般风险人群结直肠癌筛查。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jun 6;6(6):CD009276. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009276.pub2.
9
The probability of lung cancer in patients with pulmonary nodules detected via low-dose computed tomography screening in China.在中国,通过低剂量计算机断层扫描筛查发现肺结节的患者患肺癌的概率。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):1058. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14449-6.
10
Tamoxifen for adults with hepatocellular carcinoma.他莫昔芬治疗肝细胞癌成人患者。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 12;8(8):CD014869. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014869.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparative analysis of heterogeneity in lung cancer screening effectiveness in two randomised controlled trials.两项随机对照试验中肺癌筛查有效性异质性的比较分析
Nat Commun. 2025 Aug 28;16(1):8060. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-63471-6.
2
Impact of pulmonary tuberculosis on lung cancer screening: a narrative review.肺结核对肺癌筛查的影响:一项叙述性综述。
Ewha Med J. 2025 Apr;48(2):e23. doi: 10.12771/emj.2025.00052. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
3
Time to Benefit for Lung Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Survival Meta-Analysis.肺癌筛查的获益时间:一项系统评价与生存Meta分析
Am J Prev Med. 2025 Aug;69(2):107736. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2025.107736. Epub 2025 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
The Benefits and Harms of Lung Cancer Screening in Individuals With Comorbidities.合并症患者肺癌筛查的益处与危害
JTO Clin Res Rep. 2024 Jan 13;5(3):100635. doi: 10.1016/j.jtocrr.2024.100635. eCollection 2024 Mar.
2
Screening for lung cancer: 2023 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.肺癌筛查:美国癌症协会 2023 年指南更新。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 Jan-Feb;74(1):50-81. doi: 10.3322/caac.21811. Epub 2023 Nov 1.
3
What Goes into Patient Selection for Lung Cancer Screening? Factors Associated with Clinician Judgments of Suitability for Screening.肺癌筛查患者选择的因素有哪些?与临床医生对筛查适宜性判断相关的因素。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024 Jan 15;209(2):197-205. doi: 10.1164/rccm.202301-0155OC.
4
Mortality Benefit of a Blood-Based Biomarker Panel for Lung Cancer on the Basis of the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian Cohort.基于前列腺癌、肺癌、结直肠癌和卵巢癌队列的血液生物标志物面板对肺癌的生存获益。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 20;41(27):4360-4368. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.02424. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
5
Predicting the future risk of lung cancer: development, and internal and external validation of the CanPredict (lung) model in 19·67 million people and evaluation of model performance against seven other risk prediction models.预测肺癌未来风险:CanPredict(肺部)模型在 1967 万人中的开发、内部和外部验证以及该模型与其他七个风险预测模型的性能评估。
Lancet Respir Med. 2023 Aug;11(8):685-697. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(23)00050-4. Epub 2023 Apr 5.
6
Risk Model-Based Lung Cancer Screening : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.基于风险模型的肺癌筛查:成本效益分析。
Ann Intern Med. 2023 Mar;176(3):320-332. doi: 10.7326/M22-2216. Epub 2023 Feb 7.
7
Lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查。
Lancet. 2023 Feb 4;401(10374):390-408. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)01694-4. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
8
Respiratory and Cardiometabolic Comorbidities and Stages I to III NSCLC Survival: A Pooled Analysis From the International Lung Cancer Consortium.呼吸和心血管合并症与 I 期至 III 期 NSCLC 生存:国际肺癌联合会的汇总分析。
J Thorac Oncol. 2023 Mar;18(3):313-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2022.10.020. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
9
Comorbidity and life expectancy in shared decision making for lung cancer screening.肺癌筛查共同决策中的合并症与预期寿命
Semin Oncol. 2022 Jun;49(3-4):220-231. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2022.07.003. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
10
Detection of COPD in the SUMMIT Study lung cancer screening cohort using symptoms and spirometry.采用症状和肺量测定术在 SUMMIT 研究肺癌筛查队列中检测 COPD。
Eur Respir J. 2022 Dec 8;60(6). doi: 10.1183/13993003.00795-2022. Print 2022 Dec.