Suppr超能文献

微生物群移植治疗肝硬化肝性脑病:THEMATIC试验。

Microbiota transplant for hepatic encephalopathy in cirrhosis: The THEMATIC trial.

作者信息

Bajaj Jasmohan S, Fagan Andrew, Gavis Edith A, Sterling Richard K, Gallagher Mary Leslie, Lee Hannah, Matherly Scott C, Siddiqui Mohammed S, Bartels Amy, Mousel Travis, Davis Brian C, Puri Puneet, Fuchs Michael, Moutsoglou Daphne M, Thacker Leroy R, Sikaroodi Masoumeh, Gillevet Patrick M, Khoruts Alexander

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Virginia Commonwealth University and Richmond VA Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA.

出版信息

J Hepatol. 2025 Jan 10. doi: 10.1016/j.jhep.2024.12.047.

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Preventing hepatic encephalopathy (HE) recurrence in cirrhosis, which is associated with an altered gut-liver-brain axis, is an unmet need. Benefits of fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) have been shown in phase I studies, but route and dose-related questions remain.

METHODS

We performed a phase II randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, clinical trial of capsule and enema FMT in patients with cirrhosis and HE on lactulose and rifaximin. Participants were randomized into four groups (3 active doses; 2 active and 1 placebo dose; 1 active and 2 placebo doses; 3 placebo doses). Each patient received two capsules and one enema (either placebo or FMT) and were followed for 6 months. The primary outcome was FMT-related (serious) adverse events ([s]AEs)/AEs using intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary outcomes were HE recurrence, all-cause hospitalizations, death, donor engraftment, and quality-of-life. FMT was from a vegan or omnivorous donor.

RESULTS

We enrolled 60 patients (15/group) with similar baseline characteristics. FMT was safe without any FMT-related SAEs/AEs. Overall SAEs (p = 0.96) or death (p = 1.0) were similar. There were significant differences in HE recurrence between groups (p = 0.035, Cramer's V = 0.39). On post hoc analysis, recurrence was highest in the all-placebo vs. any FMT group (40% vs. 9%; odds ratio 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.64). Within the FMT groups, HE recurrence rates were similar regardless of route, doses, or donor type. Quality of life improved in FMT-recipient groups. Engraftment was highest in those with high pre-FMT Lachnospiraceae and lower in those whose HE recurred.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with cirrhosis and HE on maximal therapy, FMT regardless of dose, route, or donor was safe without any FMT-related AEs. On post hoc analysis, HE recurrence was highest in the placebo-only group and linked with lower baseline Lachnospiraceae and reduced donor engraftment.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

Patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE) already on maximal therapy could have recurrences, which worsen prognosis and are not prioritized for liver transplant. In this phase II, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial in patients with cirrhosis and prior overt HE, we found that fecal microbiota transplant (FMT) was safe and well tolerated regardless of route of delivery (oral or enema), number of doses (1 through 3), or donor type (vegan or omnivorous). HE recurrence, which was a key secondary endpoint, was different between groups and, on post hoc analysis, lowest in groups that received any FMT. Donor engraftment was higher in those with higher relative abundance of Lachnospiraceae, which was associated with lower HE recurrence.

摘要

背景与目的

预防肝硬化患者肝性脑病(HE)复发是一项尚未满足的需求,这与肠道-肝脏-脑轴改变有关。粪便微生物群移植(FMT)在I期研究中已显示出益处,但给药途径和剂量相关问题仍然存在。

方法

我们对接受乳果糖和利福昔明治疗的肝硬化和HE患者进行了一项II期随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验,比较胶囊和灌肠FMT。参与者被随机分为四组(3个活性剂量组;2个活性剂量和1个安慰剂剂量组;1个活性剂量和2个安慰剂剂量组;3个安慰剂剂量组)。每位患者接受两粒胶囊和一次灌肠(安慰剂或FMT),并随访6个月。主要结局是使用意向性分析的FMT相关(严重)不良事件([s]AE)/AE。次要结局包括HE复发、全因住院、死亡、供体植入和生活质量。FMT来自素食或杂食供体。

结果

我们纳入了60例患者(每组15例),基线特征相似。FMT是安全的,没有任何与FMT相关的严重不良事件/不良事件。总体严重不良事件(p = 0.96)或死亡(p = 1.0)相似。各组之间HE复发存在显著差异(p = 0.035,克莱默V = 0.39)。事后分析显示,全安慰剂组与任何FMT组相比复发率最高(40%对9%;比值比0.15,95%CI 0.04 - 0.64)。在FMT组中,无论给药途径、剂量或供体类型如何,HE复发率相似。FMT接受组的生活质量有所改善。FMT前毛螺菌科丰度高的患者植入率最高,HE复发患者的植入率较低。

结论

在接受最大剂量治疗的肝硬化和HE患者中,无论剂量、给药途径或供体如何,FMT都是安全的,没有任何与FMT相关的不良事件。事后分析显示,仅安慰剂组的HE复发率最高,且与较低的基线毛螺菌科丰度和供体植入减少有关。

影响与意义

已经接受最大剂量治疗的肝性脑病(HE)患者可能会复发,这会使预后恶化,并且在肝移植中不被优先考虑。在这项针对肝硬化和既往有明显HE患者的II期双盲随机安慰剂对照试验中,我们发现粪便微生物群移植(FMT)无论给药途径(口服或灌肠)、剂量数量(1至3次)或供体类型(素食或杂食)都是安全且耐受性良好的。作为关键次要终点的HE复发在各组之间存在差异,事后分析显示,接受任何FMT的组中复发率最低。毛螺菌科相对丰度较高的患者供体植入率较高,这与较低的HE复发相关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验