Lan Marie, John-Baptiste Ava, Curran Cassandra, Alemu Feben W, Avan Abolfazl, Anderson Kelly K, Ali Shehzad
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada.
Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, ON, Canada; London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada; Lawson Health Research Institute, London, ON, Canada; Schulich Interfaculty Program in Public Health, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Western University, London, ON, Canada; Centre for Medical Evidence, Decision Integrity and Clinical Impact, London, ON, Canada.
J Prev Alzheimers Dis. 2025 Jan;12(1):100017. doi: 10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100017. Epub 2025 Jan 1.
Neurological disorders account for the largest proportion of disability-adjusted life years globally, with dementia being the third leading cause. Hypertension has been identified as a priority, targetable risk factor for dementia. This study aimed to systematically review economic studies that examine the impact of hypertension prevention and control on the costs and outcomes of dementia.
An electronic literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, EconLit, and grey literature sources. The inclusion criteria were: 1) economic evaluation studies, including both full and partial evaluations; 2) a primary focus on dementia; and 3) evaluation of the impact of preventing or modifying hypertension on the burden of dementia. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Consensus on Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list.
Twelve studies were included in the final review. Four studies were full economic evaluations, while eight were partial evaluations, with one reporting costs and seven reporting the impact on dementia prevalence. Nine studies considered hypothetical reductions in hypertension rate, while three evaluated applied hypertension-related interventions. Hypertension modification was associated with higher life expectancy and a higher average age of dementia onset. Full economic evaluations of specific hypertension modification interventions found that these interventions dominated (i.e. had lower costs and higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALY)) the status quo scenario or had an acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).
Hypertension modification has the potential to reduce the burden of dementia in a cost-effective way. However, further economic evaluations of applied interventions are needed to determine real-world feasibility and cost-effectiveness.
神经系统疾病在全球伤残调整生命年中占比最大,痴呆症是第三大主要病因。高血压已被确定为痴呆症的一个优先且可干预的风险因素。本研究旨在系统回顾经济研究,以考察高血压预防和控制对痴呆症成本及结局的影响。
使用MEDLINE、EMBASE、Scopus、Web of Science、EconLit和灰色文献来源进行电子文献检索。纳入标准为:1)经济评估研究,包括全面评估和部分评估;2)主要关注痴呆症;3)评估预防或改善高血压对痴呆症负担的影响。使用卫生经济标准共识(CHEC)清单评估纳入研究的质量。
最终回顾纳入了12项研究。4项研究为全面经济评估,8项为部分评估,其中1项报告了成本,7项报告了对痴呆症患病率的影响。9项研究考虑了假设的高血压率降低情况,3项评估了应用的高血压相关干预措施。改善高血压与更高的预期寿命和更高的痴呆症发病平均年龄相关。对特定高血压改善干预措施的全面经济评估发现,这些干预措施优于现状情景(即成本更低且质量调整生命年更高)或具有可接受的增量成本效益比(ICER)。
改善高血压有可能以具有成本效益的方式减轻痴呆症负担。然而,需要对应用干预措施进行进一步的经济评估,以确定实际可行性和成本效益。