Wang Xinzhi, Soh Kim Geok, Samsudin Shamsulariffin, Li Long, Liu Chunqing, Sun Min, Ma Shuzhen
Department of Sports Studies, Faculty of Educational Studies, University Putra Malaysia, Serdang, 43400, Selangor, Malaysia.
Faculty of Physical Education, Ningxia Normal University, Guyuan City, 756000, Ningxia, China.
Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 13;15(1):1763. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-83161-5.
This review aims to conduct a meta-analysis of the impact of high-intensity training (HIT) on athlete jumping performance. As of May 2024, we conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and EBSCOhost databases in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Use the PEDro scale to evaluate the methodological quality of the included study. Meta-analysis of random effects model calculations. Conduct subgroup analysis (participant age, gender, training experience, intervention length and frequency). 18 high-quality studies met the inclusion criteria, including 490 athletes aged between 6 and 27 years old. The results showed that high-intensity interval training (HIIT) has a moderate effect on athlete jumping performance (ES = 0.918), while high-intensity functional training (HIFT) has a small effect on athlete jumping performance (ES = 0.581). The sub analysis of moderating variables includes 19 datasets. Compared with the control group, HIT has a positive impact on the jumping performance of athletes. The training experience, age, gender, intervention frequency, and intervention length of participants did not have a significant impact on the jumping performance of athletes, indicating the applicability of HIT as a training method. However, more extensive exercise experiments are needed to obtain stronger evidence.
本综述旨在对高强度训练(HIT)对运动员跳跃成绩的影响进行荟萃分析。截至2024年5月,我们按照PRISMA指南对PubMed、科学网、Scopus和EBSCOhost数据库进行了全面检索。使用PEDro量表评估纳入研究的方法学质量。进行随机效应模型计算的荟萃分析。进行亚组分析(参与者年龄、性别、训练经验、干预时长和频率)。18项高质量研究符合纳入标准,包括490名年龄在6至27岁之间的运动员。结果表明,高强度间歇训练(HIIT)对运动员跳跃成绩有中等程度的影响(效应量=0.918),而高强度功能训练(HIFT)对运动员跳跃成绩有较小影响(效应量=0.581)。调节变量的亚分析包括19个数据集。与对照组相比,HIT对运动员的跳跃成绩有积极影响。参与者的训练经验、年龄、性别、干预频率和干预时长对运动员的跳跃成绩没有显著影响,表明HIT作为一种训练方法具有适用性。然而,需要更广泛的运动实验来获得更有力的证据。