Engel Florian Azad, Ackermann Alexander, Chtourou Hamdi, Sperlich Billy
Department Movement and Training Science, Institute of Sport and Sport Science, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany.
High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Sfax, University of Sfax, Sfax, Tunisia.
Front Physiol. 2018 Jul 27;9:1012. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2018.01012. eCollection 2018.
High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is as a time-efficient alternative to moderate- or low-intensity continuous exercise for improving variables related to endurance and anaerobic performance in young and adolescent athletes. To assess original research about enhancement of endurance and anaerobic exercise performance in young and adolescent athletes performing HIIT. Relevant articles published in peer-reviewed journals were retrieved from the electronic databases PubMed and SPORTDiscus in December 2017. Inclusion criteria were: (i) controlled trials (HIIT vs. alternative training protocol) with pre-post design; (ii) healthy young athletes (≤18 years); (iii) assessing variables related to endurance and exercise performance. Hedges' g effect size (ES), and associated 95% confidence intervals were calculated for comparison of any outcome between experimental (HIIT) and alternative training protocol. Twenty four studies, involving 577 athletes (mean age: 15.5 ± 2.2 years), were included in this review. HIIT exerted no or small positive mean ES on peak oxygen uptake (VO), running performance, repeated sprint ability, jumping performance and submaximal heart rate. Although the mean ES for changes in VO with HIIT is small (mean g = 0.10±0.28), the average increase in VO from pre to post HIIT-interventions were 7.2 ± 6.9% vs. 4.3 ± 6.9% with any other alternative intervention. HIIT largely and positively affected running speed and oxygen consumption at various lactate- or ventilatory-based thresholds, as well as for sprint running performance. Calculations showed negative mean ES for change-of-direction ability (large), and peak blood lactate concentrations (small). Mean duration per training session for HIIT was shorter than for control interventions (28 ± 15 min vs. 38 ± 24 min). The present findings suggest that young athletes performing HIIT may improve certain important variables related to aerobic, as well as anaerobic, performance. With HIIT, most variables related to endurance improved to a higher extent, compared to alternative training protocols. However, based on ES, HIIT did not show clear superiority to the alternative training protocols. Nevertheless, young athletes may benefit from HIIT as it requires less time per training session leaving more time for training sport specific skills.
高强度间歇训练(HIIT)是一种高效的训练方式,可替代中低强度的持续运动,用于改善青少年运动员与耐力和无氧运动表现相关的指标。本研究旨在评估有关进行HIIT的青少年运动员耐力和无氧运动表现提升的原始研究。2017年12月,从电子数据库PubMed和SPORTDiscus中检索了发表在同行评审期刊上的相关文章。纳入标准为:(i)采用前后设计的对照试验(HIIT与替代训练方案);(ii)健康的年轻运动员(≤18岁);(iii)评估与耐力和运动表现相关的指标。计算Hedges' g效应量(ES)以及相关的95%置信区间,以比较实验(HIIT)组和替代训练方案组之间的任何结果。本综述纳入了24项研究,涉及577名运动员(平均年龄:15.5±2.2岁)。HIIT对峰值摄氧量(VO)、跑步成绩、重复冲刺能力、跳跃成绩和次最大心率的平均ES无或呈小的正值。尽管HIIT干预前后VO变化的平均ES较小(平均g = 0.10±0.28),但HIIT干预前后VO的平均增加幅度为7.2±6.9%,而其他替代干预为4.3±6.9%。HIIT对基于乳酸或通气阈值的不同跑步速度和耗氧量以及短跑成绩有很大的积极影响。计算结果显示变向能力(大)和峰值血乳酸浓度(小)的平均ES为负值。HIIT每次训练的平均时长比对照干预短(28±15分钟 vs. 38±24分钟)。目前的研究结果表明,进行HIIT的年轻运动员可能会改善某些与有氧和无氧运动表现相关的重要指标。与替代训练方案相比,采用HIIT时,大多数与耐力相关的指标改善程度更高。然而,基于ES,HIIT并未显示出明显优于替代训练方案。尽管如此,年轻运动员可能会从HIIT中受益,因为它每次训练所需时间较少,从而为训练专项运动技能留出更多时间。