Blagg J D
J Allied Health. 1985 Feb;14(1):89-98.
The inclusion of noncognitive variables in the admissions decision process has been suggested as a reliable means of more fully assessing the potential abilities of individuals within the applicant pool. An increase in predictive efficiency is particularly important now that allied health educational programs are faced with a continuing decline in the number of applicants. This study was designed to determine whether cognitive-style and learning-style variables are predictive of success in a graduate allied health education program. Three cognitive-style measures were used to assess integrative complexity, dogmatism, and field-independence-dependence. Learning-style preferences were measured by Canfield's Learning Styles Inventory. Academic success was measured by scores on the Master's Comprehensive Examination (MCE). The results indicated that there was no significant relationship between academic success and the cognitive-style variables. However, a stepwise multiple regression indicated that 20.44% of the variance on the multiple-choice section of the MCE and 41.36% of the variance on the essay portion of the MCE were explained by learning-style variables.
在招生决策过程中纳入非认知变量,已被视为更全面评估申请人潜在能力的可靠方法。鉴于联合健康职业教育项目面临申请人数量持续下降的情况,提高预测效率尤为重要。本研究旨在确定认知风格和学习风格变量是否能预测研究生联合健康职业教育项目的成功。使用了三种认知风格测量方法来评估综合复杂性、教条主义和场独立性 - 依赖性。学习风格偏好通过坎菲尔德学习风格量表进行测量。学业成绩通过硕士综合考试(MCE)的分数来衡量。结果表明,学业成绩与认知风格变量之间没有显著关系。然而,逐步多元回归表明,MCE选择题部分20.44%的方差以及MCE作文部分41.36%的方差可由学习风格变量解释。