• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Sphere transgressions: reflecting on the risks of Big Tech expansionism.领域越界:反思大型科技公司扩张主义的风险
Inf Commun Soc. 2024 Jun 4;27(15):2587-2599. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2024.2353782. eCollection 2024.
2
From hostile worlds to multiple spheres: towards a normative pragmatics of justice for the Googlization of health.从敌对世界到多个领域:走向一个规范性的实用主义,以实现健康的谷歌化正义。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):315-327. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10006-7. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
3
Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech's newfound role as global health policy makers.被隐私问题打个措手不及?数字接触者追踪、苹果/谷歌应用程序编程接口以及科技巨头作为全球卫生政策制定者的新角色。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):45-57. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
4
Sphere transgressions in medical research: tactical engagements with Apple's ResearchKit.医学研究中的领域跨越:与苹果研究工具包的策略性合作
Inf Commun Soc. 2024 Apr 15;27(15):2686-2703. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2024.2326163. eCollection 2024.
5
In Between Digital War and Peace.在数字战争与和平之间。
J Mil Ethics. 2024 Oct 22;23(2):152-161. doi: 10.1080/15027570.2024.2415201. eCollection 2024.
6
Spheres of Influence: A Walzerian Approach to Business Ethics.势力范围:一种基于沃尔泽理论的商业伦理方法
J Bus Ethics. 2021;174(1):1-14. doi: 10.1007/s10551-020-04616-z. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
"I Agree to Disagree": Comparative Ethical and Legal Analysis of Big Data and Genomics for Privacy, Consent, and Ownership.“我同意存在分歧”:大数据与基因组学在隐私、同意和所有权方面的伦理与法律比较分析
Cureus. 2021 Oct 13;13(10):e18736. doi: 10.7759/cureus.18736. eCollection 2021 Oct.
8
Big tech and societal sustainability: an ethical framework.大型科技与社会可持续性:一个伦理框架。
AI Soc. 2020;35(4):829-840. doi: 10.1007/s00146-020-00956-6. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
9
Data, Big Tech, and the New Concept of Sovereignty.数据、科技巨头与主权新概念。
J Chin Polit Sci. 2023 May 3:1-22. doi: 10.1007/s11366-023-09855-1.
10
Small farmers, big tech: agrarian commerce and knowledge on Myanmar Facebook.小农户与大科技:缅甸脸书上的农业商业与知识
Agric Human Values. 2023 May 6:1-15. doi: 10.1007/s10460-023-10446-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Access to digital health technologies: personalized framework and global perspectives.数字健康技术的获取:个性化框架与全球视角。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2025 Jul 16. doi: 10.1038/s41569-025-01184-5.
2
We need better images of AI and better conversations about AI.我们需要有关人工智能的更好图像以及关于人工智能的更深入探讨。
AI Soc. 2025;40(5):3615-3626. doi: 10.1007/s00146-024-02101-z. Epub 2024 Oct 29.
3
The Increasing Influence of Big Tech in Health and Medicine and the Need for a Public Health Ethics Perspective.科技巨头在健康与医学领域日益增长的影响力以及公共卫生伦理视角的必要性。
Public Health Ethics. 2025 May 28;18(2):phaf005. doi: 10.1093/phe/phaf005. eCollection 2025 Jul.

本文引用的文献

1
From hostile worlds to multiple spheres: towards a normative pragmatics of justice for the Googlization of health.从敌对世界到多个领域:走向一个规范性的实用主义,以实现健康的谷歌化正义。
Med Health Care Philos. 2021 Sep;24(3):315-327. doi: 10.1007/s11019-021-10006-7. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
2
Public Actors Without Public Values: Legitimacy, Domination and the Regulation of the Technology Sector.缺乏公共价值观的公共行为体:技术部门的合法性、支配与监管
Philos Technol. 2021;34(4):897-922. doi: 10.1007/s13347-020-00441-4. Epub 2021 Jan 20.
3
The ethics of inattention: revitalising civil inattention as a privacy-protecting mechanism in public spaces.疏忽的伦理:重振文明疏忽作为公共场所隐私保护机制
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(3):331-343. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09575-7. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
4
Blind-sided by privacy? Digital contact tracing, the Apple/Google API and big tech's newfound role as global health policy makers.被隐私问题打个措手不及?数字接触者追踪、苹果/谷歌应用程序编程接口以及科技巨头作为全球卫生政策制定者的新角色。
Ethics Inf Technol. 2021;23(Suppl 1):45-57. doi: 10.1007/s10676-020-09547-x. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
5
The gaming healthcare practitioner: How practices of datafication and gamification reconfigure care.游戏化医疗从业者:数据化和游戏化实践如何重新配置医疗服务。
Health Informatics J. 2019 Sep;25(3):549-557. doi: 10.1177/1460458218796608. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
6
The Googlization of health research: from disruptive innovation to disruptive ethics.健康研究的谷歌化:从颠覆性创新到颠覆性伦理。
Per Med. 2016 Nov;13(6):563-574. doi: 10.2217/pme-2016-0057. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
7
When technologies makes good people do bad things: another argument against the value-neutrality of technologies.当技术促使好人做坏事时:对技术价值中立性的又一反驳观点。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2014 Jun;20(2):329-43. doi: 10.1007/s11948-013-9464-1. Epub 2013 Aug 23.
8
Medical work and the computer-based patient record: a sociological perspective.医疗工作与基于计算机的患者记录:一种社会学视角
Methods Inf Med. 1998 Sep;37(3):294-301.

领域越界:反思大型科技公司扩张主义的风险

Sphere transgressions: reflecting on the risks of Big Tech expansionism.

作者信息

Stevens Marthe, Kraaijeveld Steven R, Sharon Tamar

机构信息

Department of Ethics and Political Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Hub for Digitalization and Society, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands.

Department of Ethics, Law & Medical Humanities, Amsterdam UMC, VU Location.

出版信息

Inf Commun Soc. 2024 Jun 4;27(15):2587-2599. doi: 10.1080/1369118X.2024.2353782. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.1080/1369118X.2024.2353782
PMID:39802962
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11716645/
Abstract

The rapid expansion of Big Tech companies into various societal domains (e.g., health, education, and agriculture) over the past decade has led to increasing concerns among governments, regulators, scholars, and civil society. While existing theoretical frameworks-often revolving around privacy and data protection, or market and platform power-have shed light on important aspects of Big Tech expansionism, there are other risks that these frameworks cannot fully capture. In response, this editorial proposes an alternative theoretical framework based on the notion of sphere transgressions, which draws on political philosopher Michael Walzer's theory of justice. The editorial not only introduces the sphere transgressions framework, but it also highlights its potential to generate novel research questions. Furthermore, this editorial introduces eight articles and one commentary from a group of interdisciplinary scholars that critically examine Big Tech expansionism by reflecting on this expansionism from the perspective of different societal spheres or by engaging with the sphere transgressions framework itself.

摘要

在过去十年中,大型科技公司迅速扩张至各个社会领域(如医疗、教育和农业),这引发了政府、监管机构、学者和民间社会越来越多的担忧。虽然现有的理论框架——通常围绕隐私和数据保护,或市场和平台权力——揭示了大型科技公司扩张主义的重要方面,但这些框架无法完全涵盖其他风险。作为回应,这篇社论提出了一个基于领域越界概念的替代性理论框架,该框架借鉴了政治哲学家迈克尔·沃尔泽的正义理论。这篇社论不仅介绍了领域越界框架,还强调了其产生新研究问题的潜力。此外,这篇社论介绍了一组跨学科学者撰写的八篇文章和一篇评论,这些文章通过从不同社会领域的角度反思这种扩张主义,或通过与领域越界框架本身进行互动,对大型科技公司扩张主义进行了批判性审视。