Prieto Antonio, Montoro Pedro R, Jimenez Mikel, Hinojosa José Antonio
Departamento de Psicología Básica I, UNED, Spain.
Department of Psychology, University of Durham, Durham, United Kingdom.
J Cogn. 2025 Jan 6;8(1):6. doi: 10.5334/joc.411. eCollection 2025.
The dissociation between conscious and unconscious perception is one of the most relevant issues in the study of human cognition. While there is evidence suggesting that some stimuli might be unconsciously processed up to its meaning (e.g., high-level stimulus processing), some authors claim that most results on the processing of subliminal stimuli can be explained by a mixture of methodological artefacts and questionable assumptions about what can be considered non-conscious. Particularly, one of the most controversial topics involves the method by which the awareness of the stimuli is assessed. To address this question, we introduced an integrative approach to assess the extent to which masked hierarchical stimuli (i.e., global shapes composed of local elements) can be processed in the absence of awareness. We combined a priming task where participants had to report global or local shapes, with the use of subjective and objective awareness measures collected either in a separate block (offline), or trial-by-trial during the main task (online). The unconscious processing of the masked primes was then evaluated through two different novel model-based methods: a Bayesian and a General Recognition Theory modeling approach. Despite the high correlation between awareness measures, our results show that the use of alternative approaches based on different theoretical assumptions leads to diverging conclusions about the extent of the unconscious processing of the masked primes.
意识知觉与无意识知觉之间的分离是人类认知研究中最相关的问题之一。虽然有证据表明,一些刺激可能会在无意识层面被处理至其意义层面(例如,高级刺激处理),但一些作者声称,关于阈下刺激处理的大多数结果可以通过方法学假象以及关于什么可被视为无意识的可疑假设的混合来解释。特别是,最具争议的话题之一涉及评估刺激意识的方法。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了一种综合方法来评估在无意识状态下,被掩盖的分层刺激(即由局部元素组成的全局形状)能够被处理的程度。我们将一个启动任务(参与者必须报告全局或局部形状)与使用主观和客观意识测量相结合,这些测量要么在单独的模块中(离线)收集,要么在主要任务期间逐次试验(在线)收集。然后,通过两种不同的基于模型的新方法评估被掩盖启动刺激的无意识处理:贝叶斯方法和一般识别理论建模方法。尽管意识测量之间存在高度相关性,但我们的结果表明,基于不同理论假设的替代方法的使用会导致关于被掩盖启动刺激无意识处理程度的不同结论。