• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估四种具有不同互锁结构的种植体系统在不同拧紧扭矩下的微间隙和封闭能力:一项研究。

Evaluating the microgap and sealing capability in four implant systems with different interlockings under different tightening torques: an study.

作者信息

Mousa Mohammed Assayed, Alshubrmi Hasna, Issrani Rakhi, Alzarea Bader Kureyem

机构信息

Department Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jouf University, Jouf, Saudia Arabia.

Department of Prosthodontics, Hail Dental Center, Ministry of Health, Hail, Saudia Arabia.

出版信息

J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Dec;16(6):336-347. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.6.336. Epub 2024 Dec 19.

DOI:10.4047/jap.2024.16.6.336
PMID:39803384
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11711449/
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study assessed the microgap width and adhesion of three bacterial species in four dental implants with different interlocks under four screwing torques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ten samples of four implant systems with various interlockings, including full-hexagonal (FHI), cylindrical-conical trilobe-index (TLI), Morse-taper with octagon terminal index (OI), and hexagonal interlock (slip-fit) (HI-SF), were used. The abutments were screwed to the fixtures under torques of 10, 20, 30, and 40 Ncm. The microgap between the abutment and the platform was assessed using a Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM). The leakage of 3 bacteria, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, was evaluated under 30 Ncm torque.

RESULTS

The TLI system showed the widest gap under all torques compared to others. There was no significance among all systems under different screwing torques. Regarding the leakage, there was no adherence to and and 36.4% of to the HI-SF, followed by the OI system. The FHI and TLI systems showed the highest bacterial adherence.

CONCLUSION

Even with low torque, the studied systems showed gap widths narrower than acceptable width. Implant systems with FHI and OI demonstrated misfits of less than 2 µm upon 10 Ncm and less than 1 µm when the torque increases, giving them priority to be used in areas with poor bone quality. The HI-SF demonstrated a high ability to resist the adherence to and , followed by OI. However, demonstrated a high ability to adhere to all systems.

摘要

目的

本研究评估了在四种不同旋紧扭矩下,四种具有不同互锁结构的牙科种植体中三种细菌的微间隙宽度和粘附情况。

材料与方法

使用了十种样本,包括四种具有不同互锁结构的种植系统,即全六边形(FHI)、圆柱 - 圆锥三叶形指数(TLI)、带八角形末端指数的莫氏锥度(OI)和六边形互锁(滑配)(HI - SF)。基台在10、20、30和40 Ncm的扭矩下旋紧到种植体上。使用扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估基台与平台之间的微间隙。在30 Ncm扭矩下评估三种细菌(金黄色葡萄球菌、大肠杆菌和铜绿假单胞菌)的渗漏情况。

结果

与其他系统相比,TLI系统在所有扭矩下显示出最宽的间隙。在不同旋紧扭矩下,所有系统之间无显著差异。关于渗漏情况,金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌在HI - SF上无粘附,36.4%的铜绿假单胞菌粘附于HI - SF,其次是OI系统。FHI和TLI系统显示出最高的细菌粘附率。

结论

即使在低扭矩下,所研究的系统显示出的间隙宽度也比可接受宽度窄。FHI和OI种植系统在10 Ncm时显示出小于2 µm的不匹配,当扭矩增加时小于1 µm,使其优先用于骨质量差的区域。HI - SF显示出对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌的高抗粘附能力,其次是OI。然而,铜绿假单胞菌显示出对所有系统的高粘附能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/ed51272e5cde/jap-16-336-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/8ca18c42eb88/jap-16-336-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/3e6deda7ecde/jap-16-336-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/414ef4b90500/jap-16-336-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/35c236421a35/jap-16-336-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/be6541a1eeac/jap-16-336-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/ed51272e5cde/jap-16-336-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/8ca18c42eb88/jap-16-336-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/3e6deda7ecde/jap-16-336-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/414ef4b90500/jap-16-336-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/35c236421a35/jap-16-336-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/be6541a1eeac/jap-16-336-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a12/11711449/ed51272e5cde/jap-16-336-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the microgap and sealing capability in four implant systems with different interlockings under different tightening torques: an study.评估四种具有不同互锁结构的种植体系统在不同拧紧扭矩下的微间隙和封闭能力:一项研究。
J Adv Prosthodont. 2024 Dec;16(6):336-347. doi: 10.4047/jap.2024.16.6.336. Epub 2024 Dec 19.
2
Influence of Different Torques on the Size of the Microgap and Bacterial Leakage in Three Commercial Implant Systems: An In Vitro Study.三种商用种植体系统中不同扭矩对微间隙大小和细菌渗漏的影响:一项体外研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2025 Mar 20;25(2):196-205. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8903.
3
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
4
Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.氧化锆基台适配精度与抗折性之间关系的实验研究
J Dent. 2014 Oct;42(10):1353-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2014.02.008. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
5
Evaluation of the Sealing Capability of the Internal Conical Connections of Implants with Titanium and Zirconia Abutments.评估钛基台和氧化锆基台种植体内部锥形连接的封闭能力。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Oct 1;18(10):915-922. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-2149.
6
In Vitro Comparison of Microbial Leakage of the Implant-Healing Abutment Interface in Four Connection Systems.四种连接系统中种植体-愈合基台界面微生物渗漏的体外比较
J Oral Implantol. 2019 Oct;45(5):350-355. doi: 10.1563/aaid-joi-D-18-00311. Epub 2019 Aug 7.
7
Microgap and microleakage of a hybrid connection platform-switched implant system in the absence or presence of a silicone-based sealing agent.混合连接平台切换种植体系统在有无硅基密封剂条件下的微间隙和微渗漏。
Odontology. 2022 Apr;110(2):231-239. doi: 10.1007/s10266-021-00652-x. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.采用体外动态加载模型研究种植体-基台界面的细菌定植。
J Periodontol. 2011 Apr;82(4):613-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100415. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
9
Bacterial translocation and microgap formation at a novel conical indexed implant abutment system for single crowns.新型锥形指数化种植体基台系统用于单冠修复时的细菌易位和微间隙形成。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1375-1389. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04112-2. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
10
Effects of tightening torque on screw stress and formation of implant-abutment microgaps: A finite element analysis.拧紧扭矩对螺钉应力和种植体-基台微间隙形成的影响:有限元分析。
J Prosthet Dent. 2022 Jun;127(6):882-889. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.11.026. Epub 2021 Jan 17.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative study of axial displacement in digital and conventional implant prosthetic components.数字与传统种植体修复部件轴向位移的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 19;14(1):19185. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69300-y.
2
Influence of Different Torques on the Size of the Microgap and Bacterial Leakage in Three Commercial Implant Systems: An In Vitro Study.三种商用种植体系统中不同扭矩对微间隙大小和细菌渗漏的影响:一项体外研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2025 Mar 20;25(2):196-205. doi: 10.11607/ijp.8903.
3
Dental Implant Placement in Medically Compromised Patients: A Literature Review.
医学状况不佳患者的牙种植体植入:文献综述
Cureus. 2024 Feb 14;16(2):e54199. doi: 10.7759/cureus.54199. eCollection 2024 Feb.
4
Does the index in Morse taper connection affect the abutment stability? An in vitro experimental study.莫氏锥度连接中的锥度指数会影响基台稳定性吗?一项体外实验研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Mar 8;19(3):e0298462. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0298462. eCollection 2024.
5
The mechanical and clinical influences of prosthetic index structure in Morse taper implant-abutment connection: a scoping review.莫氏锥度种植体-基台连接中修复指数结构的力学和临床影响:一项范围综述
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Oct 21;23(1):775. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03545-3.
6
Influence of the Use of Transepithelial Abutments vs. Titanium Base Abutments on Microgap Formation at the Dental Implant-Abutment Interface: An In Vitro Study.经上皮基台与钛基台的使用对牙种植体-基台界面微间隙形成的影响:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2023 Oct 1;16(19):6532. doi: 10.3390/ma16196532.
7
Microbiota associated with peri-implantitis-A systematic review with meta-analyses.与种植体周围炎相关的微生物群——系统评价与荟萃分析。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2023 Nov;34(11):1176-1187. doi: 10.1111/clr.14153. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
8
Impact of local predisposing/precipitating factors and systemic drivers on peri-implant diseases.局部诱发/促进因素和全身驱动因素对种植体周围疾病的影响。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023 Aug;25(4):640-660. doi: 10.1111/cid.13155. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
9
The Etiology and Management of Dental Implant Failure: A Review.牙种植体失败的病因与处理:综述
Cureus. 2022 Oct 19;14(10):e30455. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30455. eCollection 2022 Oct.
10
Effect of the prosthetic index on stress distribution in Morse taper connection implant system and peri-implant bone: a 3D finite element analysis.种植体-基台连接系统及种植体周围骨的三维有限元分析:假体指数对种植体系统中应力分布的影响。
BMC Oral Health. 2022 Sep 30;22(1):431. doi: 10.1186/s12903-022-02465-y.