• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用体外动态加载模型研究种植体-基台界面的细菌定植。

Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA.

出版信息

J Periodontol. 2011 Apr;82(4):613-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100415. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1902/jop.2010.100415
PMID:21043798
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Previously, we demonstrated that the geometry of the fixture-abutment interface influences the risk of bacterial invasion into the internal part of the implant, although the contribution of loading on this invasion was not evaluated. The aim of the present study is to use an in vitro dynamic-loading model to assess the potential risk for invasion of oral microorganisms into the fixture-abutment interface microgap of dental implants with different fixture-abutment connection characteristics.

METHODS

Twenty-eight implants were divided into two groups (n = 14 per group) based on their microgap dynamics. Group 1 was comprised of fixtures with internal Morse-taper connection that connected to standard abutments. Group 2 was comprised of implants with a four-groove conical internal connection that connected to multibase abutments. The specimens were immersed in a bacterial solution of Escherichia coli and loaded with 500,000 cycles of 15 N in a wear simulator. After disconnection of fixtures and abutments, microbial samples were taken from the threaded portion of the abutment, plated, and cultured under appropriate conditions. The difference between loosening and tightening torque value was also measured.

RESULTS

One of the 14 samples in Group 1 and 12 of the 14 of samples in Group 2 developed multiple colony forming units for E. coli. Implants in Group 1 exhibited an increase in torque value in contrast to implants in Group 2, which exhibited a decrease.

CONCLUSION

This study indicates that differences in implant design may affect the potential risk for invasion of oral microorganisms into the fixture-abutment interface microgap under dynamic-loading conditions.

摘要

背景

此前,我们已经证明了连接体-基台界面的几何形状会影响细菌侵入种植体内部的风险,尽管尚未评估加载对这种侵入的影响。本研究旨在使用体外动态加载模型评估在动态加载条件下不同连接体-基台连接特征的种植体连接体-基台界面微间隙中口腔微生物侵入的潜在风险。

方法

根据微间隙动力学,将 28 个种植体分为两组(每组 14 个)。第 1 组由与标准基台连接的内莫氏锥度连接的固位体组成。第 2 组由与多基台连接的四槽锥形内连接的种植体组成。将标本浸入大肠杆菌的细菌溶液中,在磨损模拟器中进行 500,000 次 15 N 循环加载。在拆卸固位体和基台后,从基台的螺纹部分取出微生物样本,进行平板培养,并在适当的条件下进行培养。还测量了松动和拧紧扭矩值之间的差异。

结果

第 1 组的 14 个样本中有 1 个,第 2 组的 14 个样本中有 12 个产生了大量的大肠杆菌菌落形成单位。与第 2 组相比,第 1 组的种植体显示出扭矩值的增加,而第 2 组则显示出扭矩值的降低。

结论

本研究表明,种植体设计的差异可能会影响动态加载条件下口腔微生物侵入连接体-基台界面微间隙的潜在风险。

相似文献

1
Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.采用体外动态加载模型研究种植体-基台界面的细菌定植。
J Periodontol. 2011 Apr;82(4):613-8. doi: 10.1902/jop.2010.100415. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
2
Bacterial colonization of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: an in vitro study.种植体-基台界面的细菌定植:一项体外研究。
J Periodontol. 2009 Dec;80(12):1991-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2009.090178.
3
The effect of dynamic loading on bacterial colonization of the dental implant fixture-abutment interface: an in vitro study.动态加载对牙种植体基台-种植体界面细菌定植的影响:一项体外研究。
J Oral Implantol. 2014 Aug;40(4):432-7. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-11-00207.
4
Bacterial Colonization of the Implant-Abutment Interface (IAI) of Dental Implants with a Sloped Marginal Design: An in-vitro Study.倾斜边缘设计的牙种植体种植体-基台界面(IAI)的细菌定植:一项体外研究。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2016 Feb;18(1):161-7. doi: 10.1111/cid.12287. Epub 2015 Jan 27.
5
Evaluation of the sealing capability of implants to titanium and zirconia abutments against Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, and Fusobacterium nucleatum under different screw torque values.评估在不同螺钉扭矩值下种植体与钛和氧化锆基台对牙龈卟啉单胞菌、中间普氏菌和具核梭杆菌的封闭能力。
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):561-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.11.010. Epub 2014 Mar 20.
6
Influence of repeated screw tightening on bacterial leakage along the implant-abutment interface.反复拧紧螺钉对种植体-基台界面细菌渗漏的影响。
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Dec;20(12):1394-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01769.x. Epub 2009 Aug 26.
7
Leakage of saliva through the implant-abutment interface: in vitro evaluation of three different implant connections under unloaded and loaded conditions.种植体-基台界面的唾液渗漏:三种不同种植体连接在非负重和负重条件下的体外评估。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 May-Jun;27(3):551-60.
8
Bacterial leakage in implants with different implant-abutment connections: an in vitro study.不同种植体-基台连接体的细菌渗漏:一项体外研究。
J Periodontol. 2012 Apr;83(4):491-7. doi: 10.1902/jop.2011.110320. Epub 2011 Jul 22.
9
In vitro microbiological bacterial seal analysis of the implant/abutment connection in morse taper implants: a comparative study between 2 abutments.体外微生物细菌密封分析莫氏锥度种植体种植体/基台连接:两种基台的对比研究。
Implant Dent. 2010 Apr;19(2):158-66. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181cc48b1.
10
Evaluation of implant-abutment microgap and bacterial leakage in five external-hex implant systems: an in vitro study.五种外六角种植体系统中种植体-基台微间隙和细菌渗漏的评估:一项体外研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012 Mar-Apr;27(2):346-51.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study on the Effect of Various Implant-Abutment Connections on Microbial Leakage.不同种植体-基台连接方式对微生物渗漏影响的比较研究
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 Jun;17(Suppl 2):S1307-S1309. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1928_24. Epub 2025 Jun 18.
2
Biocompatible Nanostructured Silver-Incorporated Implant Surfaces Show Effective Antibacterial, Osteogenic, and Anti-Inflammatory Effects in vitro and in Rat Model.具有生物相容性的纳米结构银植入物表面在体外和大鼠模型中表现出有效的抗菌、成骨和抗炎效果。
Int J Nanomedicine. 2023 Dec 6;18:7359-7378. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S435415. eCollection 2023.
3
Microleakage along the implant-abutment interface: a systematic review and meta-analysis of in vitro studies.
种植体-基台界面微渗漏:体外研究的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Implant Dent. 2023 Sep 21;9(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40729-023-00494-y.
4
Assessing Microleakage at 2 Different Implant-Healing Abutment Interfaces.评估 2 种不同种植体-愈合基台界面的微渗漏。
Int Dent J. 2023 Jun;73(3):370-376. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2022.07.010. Epub 2022 Sep 6.
5
Passant Connection Screw of Dental Implants: An SEM Preliminary Study.牙种植体贯穿连接螺钉的扫描电镜初步研究。
Biomed Res Int. 2022 Apr 21;2022:9720488. doi: 10.1155/2022/9720488. eCollection 2022.
6
Effects of Aging Torque Controllers on Screw Tightening Force and Bacterial Micro-Leakage on the Implant-Abutment Complex.老化扭矩控制器对种植体-基台复合体上螺丝拧紧力及细菌微渗漏的影响。
Materials (Basel). 2022 Jan 14;15(2):620. doi: 10.3390/ma15020620.
7
Effect of Application of a Bio-Adhesive on the Removal Torque Value and Rotational Misfit at the Implant-Abutment Junction: An In Vitro Study.生物粘合剂应用对种植体-基台连接处拆除扭矩值和旋转不匹配的影响:一项体外研究。
Materials (Basel). 2021 Nov 12;14(22):6832. doi: 10.3390/ma14226832.
8
Bacterial translocation and microgap formation at a novel conical indexed implant abutment system for single crowns.新型锥形指数化种植体基台系统用于单冠修复时的细菌易位和微间隙形成。
Clin Oral Investig. 2022 Feb;26(2):1375-1389. doi: 10.1007/s00784-021-04112-2. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
9
Comparative study of bacterial microfiltration in the implant-abutment interface, with straight and conical internal connections, in vitro.体外研究直型和锥型内连接种植体-基台界面细菌微滤的对比。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2021 Dec;7(6):1014-1024. doi: 10.1002/cre2.439. Epub 2021 Jun 20.
10
Marginal Adaptation and Microbial Leakage at Conometric Prosthetic Connections for Implant-Supported Single Crowns: An In Vitro Investigation.冠向聚合修复体连接用于种植体支持的单冠修复的边缘适合性和微生物渗漏:一项体外研究。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jan 17;22(2):881. doi: 10.3390/ijms22020881.