Suppr超能文献

骨质疏松症对牙种植体骨结合及生存率的影响:临床研究的系统评价

Osteoporosis' effects on dental implants osseointegration and survival rate: a systematic review of clinical studies.

作者信息

Shibli Jamil A, Naddeo Viviane, Cotrim Khalila C, Kalil Eduardo C, de Avila Erica Dorigatti, Faot Fernanda, Faverani Leonardo P, Souza João Gabriel S, Fernandes Juliana Campos Hasse, Fernandes Gustavo Vicentis Oliveira

出版信息

Quintessence Int. 2025 Mar 18;56(3):206-216. doi: 10.3290/j.qi.b5927487.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this systematic review was to critically appraise the existing evidence evaluating osteoporosis' effects on dental implant osseointegration and survival rate.

DATA SOURCE

A search was conducted in two databases, PubMed/MEDLINE and Scopus, until October 2024, using the keywords 'osteoporosis,' 'osteopenia,' 'osseointegration,' and 'dental implants'. The inclusion criteria were clinical studies that evaluated the implant placement, complications, and osseointegration results in patients with osteoporosis; literature reviews and clinical studies addressing the outcome were considered; and articles written in English and published since 2000. Descriptive data analysis included author, year of publication, study design, number of patients, osteoporosis assessment, follow-up, and main findings. JBI quality assessment was performed. Overall, 24 articles were included with a total of 2,102 patients; 5,954 dental implants were considered and evaluated. Most studies evaluated bone density for osteoporosis by dual-energy x-ray technology. The follow-up ranged from 1 month to 25 years. Four studies evaluated implants with over 10 years of follow-up. All studies' survival rate was higher than 90%, even for osteoporotic patients. Most studies indicated no differences between osteoporotic and healthy patients regarding marginal bone loss, bone-to-implant contact, cytokine levels, and mineral bone density. A prospective cohort study found a small marginal bone loss (-0.34 mm) in osteoporotic women, but there was insufficient evidence to prove any causal relationship between marginal bone loss and osteoporosis. Another study showed no clinical differences between implants placed in osteoporotic and healthy individuals. In contrast, other studies showed lower stability scores for implants placed in osteoporotic sites and a higher risk of failure for implant placement. Osteoporosis status was not a risk factor for dental implant failure, which was also confirmed by histologic studies. Three studies had a medium risk of bias, and 21 a low risk.

CONCLUSION

Osteoporosis is not a contraindication for dental implant placement. Osseointegration in patients with osteoporosis is feasible; however, planning must be cautious and personalized for the placement of dental implants.

摘要

目的

本系统评价的目的是严格评估现有证据,以评价骨质疏松症对牙种植体骨整合和生存率的影响。

数据来源

截至2024年10月,在PubMed/MEDLINE和Scopus这两个数据库中进行了检索,使用的关键词为“骨质疏松症”“骨质减少”“骨整合”和“牙种植体”。纳入标准为评估骨质疏松症患者种植体植入、并发症和骨整合结果的临床研究;考虑涉及该结果的文献综述和临床研究;以及2000年以来发表的英文文章。描述性数据分析包括作者、发表年份、研究设计、患者数量、骨质疏松症评估、随访情况和主要发现。进行了JBI质量评估。总体而言,纳入了24篇文章,共2102例患者;共考虑并评估了5954颗牙种植体。大多数研究通过双能X线技术评估骨质疏松症的骨密度。随访时间从一个月到25年不等。四项研究对随访超过10年的种植体进行了评估。所有研究的生存率均高于90%,即使是骨质疏松症患者。大多数研究表明,在边缘骨丢失、骨与种植体接触、细胞因子水平和矿化骨密度方面,骨质疏松症患者与健康患者之间没有差异。一项前瞻性队列研究发现骨质疏松症女性存在少量边缘骨丢失(-0.34毫米),但没有足够证据证明边缘骨丢失与骨质疏松症之间存在因果关系。另一项研究表明,在骨质疏松症患者和健康个体中植入的种植体在临床上没有差异。相比之下,其他研究表明,在骨质疏松部位植入的种植体稳定性评分较低,种植体植入失败风险较高。组织学研究也证实,骨质疏松状态不是牙种植体失败的危险因素。三项研究存在中等偏倚风险,21项研究存在低偏倚风险。

结论

骨质疏松症不是牙种植体植入的禁忌证。骨质疏松症患者的骨整合是可行的;然而,牙种植体植入的规划必须谨慎且个性化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验