Shiffer Dana, Desai Antonio, Cesari Matteo, Generali Elena, Greco Massimiliano, Savioli Gabriele, Giordano Mauro, Voza Antonio
Department of Emergency Medicine, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy.
Geroscience. 2025 Jan 13. doi: 10.1007/s11357-024-01472-x.
As the elderly population expands, enhancing emergency department (ED) care by assessing frailty becomes increasingly vital. To address this, we developed a novel electronic Frailty Index (eFI) from ED health records, specifically designed to assess frailty and predict hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, ICU admissions, and 30-day ED readmissions. This retrospective, single-center study included patients 65 years old or older who presented to the ED of IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital in Milan, Italy, between January 2015 and December 2019. Frailty was assessed using a novel electronic Frailty Index (eFI), based on the cumulative deficit model, incorporating 45 health deficits to quantify frailty. Patients were divided into four quartiles based on eFI scores to explore the association between frailty levels and adverse outcomes, including hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and 30-day ED readmission. The study included 21,537 patients (mean age 77.4, 50.7% males). The median eFI score was 0.16. Hospitalization rates rose significantly with frailty, from 20% in the least frail quartile to 43% in the most frail. Similarly, in-hospital mortality and ICU admissions increased markedly with higher eFI scores, with mortality rates climbing from 0.44 to 5.0% across quartiles. The 30-day ED readmission rates significantly rose from 9.9 to 19.8%. For every 0.01 increase in eFI score, the odds of hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and 30-day ED readmission significantly increased (P < 0.0001). Specifically, the adjusted odds ratios (OR) for hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, ICU admission, and ED readmission rose to 3.55, 14.15, 4.70, and 2.22, respectively (P < 0.0001), in the most frail compared to the least frail quartile. The integration of the eFI into ED settings can enable more precise risk stratification and resource allocation, significantly improving patient management and healthcare delivery for older persons in these urgent care contexts.
随着老年人口的增加,通过评估虚弱程度来加强急诊科(ED)护理变得越发重要。为解决这一问题,我们从急诊科健康记录中开发了一种新型电子虚弱指数(eFI),专门用于评估虚弱程度并预测住院情况、院内死亡率、重症监护病房(ICU)收治率以及30天内急诊科再入院率。这项回顾性单中心研究纳入了2015年1月至2019年12月期间在意大利米兰IRCCS胡曼itas研究医院急诊科就诊的65岁及以上患者。基于累积缺陷模型,采用一种新型电子虚弱指数(eFI)评估虚弱程度,该指数纳入45项健康缺陷以量化虚弱程度。根据eFI评分将患者分为四个四分位数,以探讨虚弱程度与不良结局之间的关联,不良结局包括住院、院内死亡率、ICU收治以及30天内急诊科再入院。该研究纳入了21,537名患者(平均年龄77.4岁,男性占50.7%)。eFI评分中位数为0.16。住院率随虚弱程度显著上升,从最不虚弱四分位数组的20%升至最虚弱四分位数组的43%。同样,随着eFI评分升高,院内死亡率和ICU收治率显著增加,各四分位数组的死亡率从0.44%攀升至5.0%。30天内急诊科再入院率从9.9%显著升至19.8%。eFI评分每增加0.01,住院、院内死亡、ICU收治以及30天内急诊科再入院的几率显著增加(P < 0.0001)。具体而言,与最不虚弱四分位数组相比,最虚弱四分位数组住院、院内死亡、ICU收治以及急诊科再入院的调整比值比(OR)分别升至3.55、14.15、4.70和2.22(P < 0.0001)。将eFI纳入急诊科环境能够实现更精确的风险分层和资源分配,显著改善这些紧急护理环境中老年人的患者管理和医疗服务提供。