Kojima Gotaro, Liljas Ann E M, Iliffe Steve
Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK,
Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2019 Feb 14;12:23-30. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S168750. eCollection 2019.
Older adults are a highly heterogeneous group with variable health and functional life courses. Frailty has received increasing scientific attention as a potential explanation of the health diversity of older adults. The frailty phenotype and the Frailty Index are the most frequently used frailty definitions, but recently new frailty definitions that are more practical have been advocated. Prevalence of frailty among the community-dwelling population aged 65 years and older is ~10% but varies depending on which frailty definitions are used. The mean prevalence of frailty gradually increases with age, but the individual's frailty level can be improved. Older adults, especially frail older adults, form the main users of medical and social care services. However, current health care systems are not well prepared to deal with the chronic and complex medical needs of frail older patients. In this context, frailty is potentially a perfect fit as a risk stratification paradigm. The evidence from frailty studies has not yet been fully translated into clinical practice and health care policy making. Successful implementation would improve quality of care and promote healthy aging as well as diminish the impact of aging on health care systems and strengthen their sustainability. At present, however, there is no effective treatment for frailty and the most effective intervention is not yet known. Based on currently available evidence, multi-domain intervention trials, including exercise component, especially multicomponent exercise, which includes resistance training, seem to be promising. The current challenges in frailty research include the lack of an international standard definition of frailty, further understanding of interventions to reverse frailty, the best timing for intervention, and education/training of health care professionals. The hazards of stigmatization should also be considered. If these concerns are properly addressed, widespread application of public health approaches will be possible, including screening, identification, and treatment of frailty, resulting in better care and healthier aging for older people.
老年人是一个高度异质的群体,其健康状况和功能性生活历程各不相同。衰弱作为老年人健康多样性的一种潜在解释,已受到越来越多的科学关注。衰弱表型和衰弱指数是最常用的衰弱定义,但最近有人提倡使用更实用的新衰弱定义。65岁及以上社区居住人群中衰弱的患病率约为10%,但因所使用的衰弱定义不同而有所差异。衰弱的平均患病率随年龄增长而逐渐增加,但个体的衰弱程度可以改善。老年人,尤其是衰弱的老年人,是医疗和社会护理服务的主要使用者。然而,当前的医疗保健系统尚未做好充分准备来应对衰弱老年患者的慢性和复杂医疗需求。在这种背景下,衰弱作为一种风险分层范式可能是完美契合的。衰弱研究的证据尚未完全转化为临床实践和医疗保健政策制定。成功实施将提高护理质量,促进健康老龄化,同时减少老龄化对医疗保健系统的影响并增强其可持续性。然而,目前尚无针对衰弱的有效治疗方法,最有效的干预措施也尚不明确。根据现有证据,包括运动成分,尤其是包括阻力训练的多成分运动的多领域干预试验似乎很有前景。衰弱研究目前面临的挑战包括缺乏衰弱的国际标准定义、对逆转衰弱的干预措施的进一步了解、最佳干预时机以及对医疗保健专业人员的教育/培训。还应考虑污名化的危害。如果这些问题得到妥善解决,包括对衰弱进行筛查、识别和治疗在内的公共卫生方法的广泛应用将成为可能,从而为老年人带来更好的护理和更健康的老龄化。