• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于全膝关节置换无菌性松动的带柄翻修关节成形术。

Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement.

作者信息

Bertin K C, Freeman M A, Samuelson K M, Ratcliffe S S, Todd R C

出版信息

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Mar;67(2):242-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.67B2.3980534.

DOI:10.1302/0301-620X.67B2.3980534
PMID:3980534
Abstract

Fifty-three failed knee replacements were revised using minimally constrained implants with smooth uncemented intramedullary stems and metal-backed tibial components. Polymethylmethacrylate was used only to replace lost bone near the surface of the implant. Excluding four knees which had serious postoperative complications, 91% had successful relief of pain, 84% had over 90 degrees of movement and 80% could walk for more than 30 minutes. Review of the radiographs showed that there were no progressive lucencies at the interface between bone and cement, and no subsidence of components or changes in alignment. At the uncemented stem-to-bone interface, thin white lines developed near the metal, and their significance is discussed. This revision technique is an effective treatment for aseptic failure of primary total knee arthroplasty.

摘要

五十三例膝关节置换失败病例采用了微创约束性植入物进行翻修,该植入物带有光滑的非骨水泥髓内柄和金属背衬的胫骨部件。聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯仅用于替代植入物表面附近缺失的骨质。排除四例术后出现严重并发症的膝关节,91%的患者疼痛得到成功缓解,84%的患者活动度超过90度,80%的患者能够行走超过30分钟。X线片复查显示,骨与骨水泥界面无进行性透亮区,部件无下沉或对线改变。在非骨水泥柄与骨的界面处,金属附近出现了细白线,并对其意义进行了讨论。这种翻修技术是治疗初次全膝关节置换无菌性失败的有效方法。

相似文献

1
Stemmed revision arthroplasty for aseptic loosening of total knee replacement.用于全膝关节置换无菌性松动的带柄翻修关节成形术。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1985 Mar;67(2):242-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.67B2.3980534.
2
Revision total knee arthroplasty with a cemented posterior-stabilized or constrained condylar prosthesis: a minimum 3-year and average 5-year follow-up study.采用骨水泥固定的后稳定型或限制性髁假体进行全膝关节翻修术:至少3年及平均5年的随访研究。
J Arthroplasty. 1997 Dec;12(8):896-903. doi: 10.1016/s0883-5403(97)90159-5.
3
Varus-valgus constraint in 416 revision total knee arthroplasties with cemented stems provides a reliable reconstruction with a low subsequent revision rate at early to mid-term review.在使用骨水泥固定柄的 416 例翻修全膝关节置换术中,采用内翻-外翻限制技术可提供可靠的重建,在早期至中期随访中具有较低的后续翻修率。
Bone Joint J. 2020 Apr;102-B(4):458-462. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.102B4.BJJ-2019-0719.R2.
4
[Revision knee arthroplasty due to aseptic loosening].[因无菌性松动行膝关节翻修置换术]
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 2007 Feb;74(1):5-13.
5
Results with the constrained total knee prosthesis in treating severely disabled patients and patients with failed total knee replacements.采用受限型全膝关节假体治疗严重残疾患者及全膝关节置换失败患者的结果。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1980;62(4):504-12.
6
Cemented revision of failed uncemented femoral components of total hip arthroplasty.全髋关节置换术中失败的非骨水泥型股骨假体的骨水泥翻修术。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003 Jul;85(7):1264-9. doi: 10.2106/00004623-200307000-00012.
7
Isolated Tibial Component Failure in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Case Series Evaluating Inflammatory Response versus Mechanical Failure.全膝关节置换术中孤立性胫骨组件失败:一项评估炎症反应与机械性失败的病例系列研究
J Knee Surg. 2019 Jul;32(7):659-666. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1666831. Epub 2018 Jul 10.
8
A Novel Percentage-Based System for Determining Aseptic Loosening of Total Knee Arthroplasty Tibial Components.一种用于确定全膝关节置换术胫骨组件无菌性松动的新型基于百分比的系统。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Jul;32(7):2274-2278. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.020. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
9
Noncemented revision total knee arthroplasty.非骨水泥型翻修全膝关节置换术
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1994 Dec(309):110-5.
10
Femoral Component Varus Malposition is Associated with Tibial Aseptic Loosening After TKA.全膝关节置换术后股骨组件内翻错位与胫骨无菌性松动有关。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2018 Feb;476(2):400-407. doi: 10.1007/s11999.0000000000000012.

引用本文的文献

1
Conceptual Design and Additive Manufacturing of a Bidirectional Gradient Gyroid Structure for Tibial Stem.
Ann Biomed Eng. 2025 Sep 23. doi: 10.1007/s10439-025-03854-4.
2
Short- and Mid-term Radiographic Outcomes of Ream-then-broaching Metaphyseal Cones During Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.翻修全膝关节置换术中扩髓后拉拔干骺端锥体的短期和中期影像学结果
Arthroplast Today. 2025 Jan 30;32:101615. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2025.101615. eCollection 2025 Apr.
3
Aseptic midterm survival rates between different cemented tibial stem designs in hinged total knee arthroplasty: a 6-year evaluation from the German Arthroplasty Registry.不同铰链式全膝关节置换术固定胫骨柄设计的无菌中期生存率:德国关节置换登记处的 6 年评估。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 May;144(5):2283-2295. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05273-x. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
4
Cemented versus Cementless Stem Fixation in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.全膝关节置换翻修术中骨水泥型与非骨水泥型假体柄固定的系统评价与Meta分析
Antibiotics (Basel). 2023 Nov 17;12(11):1633. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics12111633.
5
Changes in femoral rollback and rotation with increasing coupling in knee arthroplasty-a biomechanical in-vitro study.膝关节置换术中随着关节匹配增加时股骨后滚和旋转的变化:一项生物力学的体外研究。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 May 2;24(1):341. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06430-w.
6
The use of tantalum cones and diaphyseal-engaging stems in tibial component revision: a consecutive series.钽锥体和骨干固定型柄在胫骨假体翻修中的应用:连续病例系列研究
Knee Surg Relat Res. 2022 Mar 10;34(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s43019-022-00141-7.
7
Trunnion Failure in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty.翻修全膝关节置换术中的耳轴故障
Arthroplast Today. 2021 Feb 26;8:258-261. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2021.01.003. eCollection 2021 Apr.
8
Revision total knee arthroplasty: hybrid vs standard cemented fixation.全膝关节置换翻修术:混合式与标准骨水泥固定
J Orthop Traumatol. 2018 Aug 17;19(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s10195-018-0494-y.
9
Painful Knee is not Uncommon after total Knee Arthroplasty and can be Treated by Arthroscopic Debridement.全膝关节置换术后出现疼痛性膝关节并不罕见,可通过关节镜清创术进行治疗。
Open Orthop J. 2017 Oct 31;11:1147-1153. doi: 10.2174/1874325001711011147. eCollection 2017.
10
Revision knee surgery techniques.膝关节翻修手术技术
EFORT Open Rev. 2017 Mar 13;1(5):233-238. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.000024. eCollection 2016 May.