Scala Marco, Dallera Giulia, Gorini Giuseppe, Achille Jérémie, Havermans Anne, Neto Clara, Odone Anna, Smits Luc, Zambon Antonella, Lugo Alessandra, Gallus Silvano
Department of Medical Epidemiology, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS.
Oncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO).
J Epidemiol. 2025 May 5;35(5):213-221. doi: 10.2188/jea.JE20240189. Epub 2025 Mar 31.
Relative or absolute safety of heated tobacco products (HTPs) remains unknown, while independent literature suggests that these products do not favor tobacco control. We conducted a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate HTP usage patterns and the effect of HTP use on conventional tobacco smoking (use transitions).
We used Pubmed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all articles published up to February 2022 on HTP use. For the present review, we included all representative cross-sectional studies dealing with HTP use, and all prospective cohort studies or cross-sectional studies on conventional tobacco smoking transitions due to HTP use. From 610 non-duplicate articles, 76 were eligible (71 cross-sectional and 5 prospective cohort studies).
Compared with young adults, HTP use was less frequent among middle-aged (15 studies; pooled odds ratio [OR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.48-0.74) and older adults (12 studies; OR 0.17; 95% CI, 0.07-0.38). HTP use was more frequent among former (6 studies; OR 2.73; 95% CI, 1.03-7.25) and current smokers (12 studies; OR 14.53; 95% CI, 6.34-33.31). Overall, 68.3% of HTP users were dual users (n = 26). Eight studies (including 5 cohorts) showed that HTP users were more likely than non-users to start conventional cigarette smoking (2 studies; OR 6.31; 95% CI, 4.13-9.65), whereas current cigarette smokers using HTPs were less likely to quit (4 studies; OR 0.84; 95% CI, 0.80-0.89).
We found that HTPs are specifically popular among young generations. More than two out of three HTP users are dual users. Prospective studies consistently show that, in real life, HTPs are not effective smoking-cessation tools.
加热烟草制品(HTP)的相对或绝对安全性仍然未知,而独立文献表明这些产品不利于烟草控制。我们进行了一项全面的系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估HTP的使用模式以及HTP使用对传统吸烟(使用转变)的影响。
我们使用PubMed/MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane图书馆来识别截至2022年2月发表的所有关于HTP使用的文章。对于本综述,我们纳入了所有涉及HTP使用的代表性横断面研究,以及所有关于因使用HTP导致传统吸烟转变的前瞻性队列研究或横断面研究。从610篇非重复文章中,76篇符合条件(71篇横断面研究和5篇前瞻性队列研究)。
与年轻人相比,中年人群(15项研究;合并优势比[OR]0.59;95%置信区间[CI],0.48 - 0.74)和老年人群(12项研究;OR 0.17;95% CI,0.07 - 0.38)中HTP的使用频率较低。在曾经吸烟者(6项研究;OR 2.73;95% CI,1.03 - 7.25)和当前吸烟者(12项研究;OR 14.53;95% CI,6.34 - 33.31)中,HTP的使用频率较高。总体而言,68.3%的HTP使用者是双重使用者(n = 26)。八项研究(包括五项队列研究)表明,HTP使用者比非使用者更有可能开始吸传统香烟(两项研究;OR 6.31;95% CI,4.13 - 9.65),而当前吸传统香烟者使用HTP后戒烟的可能性较小(四项研究;OR 0.84;95% CI,0.80 - 0.89)。
我们发现HTP在年轻一代中特别受欢迎。超过三分之二的HTP使用者是双重使用者。前瞻性研究一致表明,在现实生活中,HTP不是有效的戒烟工具。