Braunack-Mayer Lydia, Nekkab Narimane, Malinga Josephine, Kelly Sherrie L, Ansah Evelyn, Moehrle Joerg J, Penny Melissa A
Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Allschwil, Switzerland.
University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Malar J. 2025 Jan 13;24(1):12. doi: 10.1186/s12936-024-05222-4.
The clinical development of novel vaccines, injectable therapeutics, and oral chemoprevention drugs has the potential to deliver significant advancements in the prevention of Plasmodium falciparum malaria. These innovations could support regions in accelerating malaria control, transforming existing intervention packages by supplementing interventions with imperfect effectiveness or offering an entirely new tool. However, to layer new medical tools as part of an existing programme, malaria researchers must come to an agreement on the gaps that currently limit the effectiveness of medical interventions for moderate to low transmission settings. In this perspective, three crucial gaps that may prevent new therapeutics from being used to their fullest extent are presented. First, do burden reduction outcomes, which are typically monitored in studies of new medical products, sufficiently capture the broader goal of accelerating malaria control? Layering novel malaria products requires monitoring health outcomes that reflect the novel product's targeted stage of the parasite life cycle, in addition to all-infection and prevalence-based outcomes. Second, what public health outcome does a novel medical prevention tool provide that existing malaria interventions cannot fully deliver? Novel medical tools should be developed not just for an incremental improvement in preventive efficacy over an existing product, but also to meet a gap in protection. Specifically, this means designing products with components that target parts of the parasite life cycle beyond the scope of existing therapeutics, and better addressing populations and settings not well covered by existing tools. Finally, when do the population-level benefits of a multi-tool prevention programme justify the individual-level outcomes from receiving multiple interventions? An individual-level perspective should be key for exploring when and how layering a novel prevention intervention can accelerate efforts towards P. falciparum malaria control.
新型疫苗、注射用治疗药物和口服化学预防药物的临床开发有可能在预防恶性疟原虫疟疾方面取得重大进展。这些创新可以支持各地区加快疟疾控制,通过补充效果欠佳的干预措施或提供全新工具来改变现有的干预方案。然而,要将新的医疗工具纳入现有项目,疟疾研究人员必须就目前限制中低传播环境下医疗干预效果的差距达成共识。从这个角度出发,本文提出了可能阻碍新治疗方法充分发挥作用的三个关键差距。首先,在新医疗产品研究中通常监测的负担减轻结果是否足以体现加快疟疾控制这一更广泛的目标?除了全感染率和基于患病率的结果外,引入新型疟疾产品还需要监测反映该新产品针对的寄生虫生命周期阶段的健康结果。其次,新型医学预防工具能提供哪些现有疟疾干预措施无法完全实现的公共卫生成果?开发新型医学工具不仅要在预防效果上比现有产品有渐进式的提高,还要填补保护方面的空白。具体来说,这意味着设计出针对现有治疗方法范围之外的寄生虫生命周期部分的产品,并更好地覆盖现有工具覆盖不足的人群和环境。最后,多工具预防计划在人群层面的益处何时能证明接受多种干预措施在个体层面的结果是合理的?个体层面的视角对于探索何时以及如何叠加新型预防干预措施能够加速恶性疟原虫疟疾控制工作至关重要。