Suppr超能文献

超越共同生产:由公众贡献者主导的对国家卫生与社会保健研究所(NIHR)研究倡导者角色的本地评估。

Going beyond co-production: a public contributor led, local evaluation of the National Institute of Health and Social Care (NIHR) Research Champion role.

作者信息

Hedayioglu Julie, Mossie Frances, Coleman Carol

机构信息

Kent Community NHS Foundation Trust, Trinity House, 110-120, Upper Pemberton, Ashford, Kent, TN25 4AZ, England.

Research and Innovation Department, Maidstone and Tunbridge Wells NHS Trust, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone, Kent, ME16 9QQ, England.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jan 13;11(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s40900-024-00660-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The National Institute of Health and Social Care (NIHR) Research Champion (RC) role, has grown over the last few years. This public contributor role was designed to engage and involve patients and the public in health and care research within the NHS. Yet, there has been little focus on how it is working and experienced. Moreover, there is a lack of research that has been initiated, and/or led, by patients and the public.

AIM

To conduct a public contributor led evaluation to understand the experiences and perceived impact of the NIHR RC role that supports NHS research.

METHOD

A qualitative, formative evaluation using semi-structured interviews.

RESULTS

Rich and detailed data was obtained from 11 RCs and 4 staff members with thematic analysis identifying four main themes: RC Activities, Recruitment and Background of RCs, their Support and Engagement, and the Impact of the RC role.

CONCLUSIONS

The RC role is highly valued by both staff and volunteers, and is versatile; it can be adapted to the needs of the research, volunteers, and hosting organisations. There are challenges in recruiting to the role but there are many positives to those that have taken it up. These include giving dedicated time, bringing valuable life experiences and professional skills, and being a meaningful activity for the RCs. Greater awareness and recognition of this role as a valuable resource is needed with more attention and investment required to staff supporting RCs.

摘要

背景

国家卫生与社会保健研究所(NIHR)的研究倡导者(RC)角色在过去几年中不断发展。这一公众贡献者角色旨在让患者和公众参与国民保健制度(NHS)内的健康与护理研究。然而,很少有人关注其运作方式和实际体验。此外,由患者和公众发起和/或主导的研究也很缺乏。

目的

开展一项由公众贡献者主导的评估,以了解支持NHS研究的NIHR RC角色的体验和感知影响。

方法

采用半结构化访谈进行定性的形成性评估。

结果

从11名研究倡导者和4名工作人员那里获得了丰富而详细的数据,主题分析确定了四个主要主题:研究倡导者的活动、招募情况和背景、他们的支持与参与,以及研究倡导者角色的影响。

结论

研究倡导者角色受到工作人员和志愿者的高度重视,且具有多功能性;它可以根据研究、志愿者和主办组织的需求进行调整。该角色的招募存在挑战,但对于担任该角色的人来说有很多积极方面。这些包括投入专门时间、带来宝贵的生活经验和专业技能,以及对研究倡导者而言是一项有意义的活动。需要提高对这一作为宝贵资源的角色的认识和认可,并且需要更多关注和投入来配备支持研究倡导者的人员。

相似文献

6
The value of involving patients and public in health services research and evaluation: a qualitative study.
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jun 29;7(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00289-8.

本文引用的文献

3
"An Active, Productive Life": Narratives of, and Through, Participation in Public and Patient Involvement in Health Research.
Qual Health Res. 2020 Dec;30(14):2265-2277. doi: 10.1177/1049732320961053. Epub 2020 Oct 3.
4
The role of patient and public involvement leads in facilitating feedback: "invisible work".
Res Involv Engagem. 2020 Jul 10;6:40. doi: 10.1186/s40900-020-00209-2. eCollection 2020.
5
ALS clinical research learning institutes (ALS-CRLI): empowering people with ALS to be research ambassadors.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2020 May;21(3-4):216-221. doi: 10.1080/21678421.2019.1690519. Epub 2019 Nov 15.
7
8
Moving beyond project-specific patient and public involvement in research.
J R Soc Med. 2020 Jan;113(1):16-23. doi: 10.1177/0141076819890551.
9
The dark side of coproduction: do the costs outweigh the benefits for health research?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Mar 28;17(1):33. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0432-3.
10
Inverting the patient involvement paradigm: defining patient led research.
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Jul 10;4:21. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0104-4. eCollection 2018.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验