• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者和公众参与研究:从象征性的勾选到有价值的团队成员。

Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members.

机构信息

Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med. 2020 Apr 13;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7
PMID:32279658
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7153227/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Patient and public involvement (PPI) in research envisages a relationship built throughout the lifespan of a research project between academics, clinicians and PPI colleagues in order to inform, plan, execute and, in due course, disseminate and translate research. To be meaningful, all stakeholders need to actively engage in this exchange of expertise. However, despite some funders requiring PPI plans to be included in grant applications, there remains a gap between what is expected and what is delivered.

MAIN BODY

As an exemplar, we reflect on how, in the Asthma UK Centre for Applied Research (AUKCAR), we set out to create a supportive, organised environment with the overarching value of 'keeping patients at the heart of everything we do'. The key has been in planning and creating a suitably funded organisational infrastructure with dedicated PPI researchers along with the development of and expectation to abide by an agreed set of norms and values. Specifically, expecting AUKCAR PhD students and early career researchers to engage with PPI has established a working mode that we hope will last. Regular interactions and proactive Patient Leads increase PPI network cohesion.

CONCLUSION

With adaptation, the AUKCAR PPI model can be translated to international contexts.

摘要

背景

患者和公众参与(PPI)研究设想在研究项目的整个生命周期中,学者、临床医生和 PPI 同事之间建立一种关系,以便在适当的时候告知、计划、执行、传播和转化研究。为了有意义,所有利益相关者都需要积极参与这种专业知识的交流。然而,尽管一些资助者要求在资助申请中包含 PPI 计划,但期望和实际交付之间仍然存在差距。

主要内容

作为一个范例,我们反思了在英国哮喘协会应用研究中心(AUKCAR)中,我们如何着手创建一个支持性的、有组织的环境,其首要价值是“将患者放在我们所做的一切的核心”。关键在于规划和创建一个有适当资金支持的组织基础设施,配备专门的 PPI 研究人员,同时制定并期望遵守一套商定的规范和价值观。具体来说,期望 AUKCAR 博士生和早期职业研究人员参与 PPI 已经建立了一种我们希望能够持续的工作模式。定期的互动和积极主动的患者负责人增加了 PPI 网络的凝聚力。

结论

通过调整,AUKCAR 的 PPI 模式可以转化为国际环境。

相似文献

1
Patient and public involvement in research: from tokenistic box ticking to valued team members.患者和公众参与研究:从象征性的勾选到有价值的团队成员。
BMC Med. 2020 Apr 13;18(1):79. doi: 10.1186/s12916-020-01544-7.
2
Patient and public involvement in research: the need for budgeting PPI staff costs in funding applications.患者及公众参与研究:在资助申请中为患者及公众参与(PPI)工作人员成本编制预算的必要性。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Mar 25;9(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00424-7.
3
From plans to actions in patient and public involvement: qualitative study of documented plans and the accounts of researchers and patients sampled from a cohort of clinical trials.从患者及公众参与的计划到行动:对临床试验队列中记录的计划以及研究人员和患者描述的定性研究
BMJ Open. 2014 Dec 4;4(12):e006400. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006400.
4
The Development of Principles for Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in Preclinical Spinal Cord Research: A Modified Delphi Study.患者和公众参与(PPI)在临床前脊髓研究中的原则的发展:一项改良德尔菲研究。
Health Expect. 2024 Aug;27(4):e14130. doi: 10.1111/hex.14130.
5
The impact of patient and public involvement in the work of the Dementias & Neurodegenerative Diseases Research Network (DeNDRoN): case studies.患者和公众参与痴呆症和神经退行性疾病研究网络(DeNDRoN)工作的影响:案例研究。
Health Expect. 2013 Dec;16(4):351-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2011.00728.x. Epub 2011 Sep 8.
6
Is this really Empowerment? Enhancing our understanding of empowerment in patient and public involvement within clinical research.这真的是赋权吗?增强我们对临床研究中患者和公众参与赋权的理解。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 13;24(1):205. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02323-1.
7
Learning to work together - lessons from a reflective analysis of a research project on public involvement.学会协同合作——一项关于公众参与的研究项目反思性分析的经验教训
Res Involv Engagem. 2017 Jan 9;3:1. doi: 10.1186/s40900-016-0051-x. eCollection 2017.
8
It's not just 'What' you do, it's also the 'Way' that you do it: Patient and Public Involvement in the Development of Health Research.重要的不仅是你“做什么”,还有你“怎么做”:患者和公众参与健康研究的发展。
Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Mar 1;30(2):152-156. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzx177.
9
Community engagement and involvement in Ghana: conversations with community stakeholders to inform surgical research.加纳的社区参与:与社区利益相关者的对话,为外科研究提供信息。
Res Involv Engagem. 2021 Jul 5;7(1):50. doi: 10.1186/s40900-021-00270-5.
10
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in evidence synthesis: how the PatMed study approached embedding audience responses into the expression of a meta-ethnography.患者和公众参与(PPI)在证据综合中的应用:PatMed 研究如何将受众反馈纳入元分析表达的方法。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0918-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Interest in public involvement, engagement and participation in research among patients with asthma: A secondary analysis of the EPI-ASTHMA study.哮喘患者对公众参与、介入和参与研究的兴趣:EPI - 哮喘研究的二次分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 12;20(9):e0332220. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332220. eCollection 2025.
2
Community Engagement in Long Covid Research: Process, Evaluation and Recommendations From the Long COVID and Episodic Disability Study.社区参与长新冠研究:来自长新冠与发作性残疾研究的过程、评估及建议
Health Expect. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70365. doi: 10.1111/hex.70365.
3
Creating the conditions for meaningful and effective PPIE in community-based public health research: learning from a UK-wide lived experience panel.

本文引用的文献

1
The need to establish sustainable public and patient involvement in research in low and middle income countries.在低收入和中等收入国家建立可持续的公众及患者参与研究的必要性。
J R Soc Med. 2019 Nov;112(11):456-458. doi: 10.1177/0141076819865867. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
2
Patient and public involvement in health research in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review.患者和公众参与中低收入国家的卫生研究:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 9;9(5):e026514. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026514.
3
Learning as an outcome of involvement in research: what are the implications for practice, reporting and evaluation?
为基于社区的公共卫生研究中开展有意义且有效的公众及患者参与、介入与合作创造条件:借鉴全英生活经历小组的经验
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 17;11(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00727-x.
4
Navigating trauma and strength: experiences of Ghanaian and Nigerian youth in inner London.穿越创伤与力量:伦敦市中心加纳和尼日利亚青年的经历
Discov Ment Health. 2025 Jul 9;5(1):103. doi: 10.1007/s44192-025-00233-2.
5
Regional differences in experiences of patients with metastatic breast cancer in the Republic of Ireland and Northern Ireland: a comparative analysis (CTRIAL-IE 23-05).爱尔兰共和国和北爱尔兰转移性乳腺癌患者经历的地区差异:一项比较分析(CTRIAL-IE 23-05)
BMJ Open Qual. 2025 Jul 1;14(3):e003254. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003254.
6
Co-Production and Implementation of 'Count Me In': A Bottom-Up Approach to Inclusive Research and Participation in a National Health Service in England.“算我一份”的共同制作与实施:一种自下而上的方法,用于在英格兰国民医疗服务体系中开展包容性研究与参与
Health Expect. 2025 Jun;28(3):e70326. doi: 10.1111/hex.70326.
7
The ultimate power play in research - partnering with patients, partnering with power.研究中的终极权力博弈——与患者合作,与权力合作。
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jun 17;11(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00745-9.
8
Stakeholder engagement champions: a locally-driven model for building impactful and sustainable relationships in global health research.利益相关者参与倡导者:一种在全球卫生研究中建立有影响力和可持续关系的地方驱动模式。
J Glob Health. 2025 Jun 6;15:03026. doi: 10.7189/jogh.15.03026.
9
How populist-aligned views affect receipt of non-COVID-19-related public health interventions: a systematic review of quantitative studies.民粹主义倾向观点如何影响非新冠疫情相关公共卫生干预措施的接受度:定量研究的系统评价
BMC Public Health. 2025 Jun 4;25(1):2075. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-23265-3.
10
PPI-POWER-Planning our work with equity and respect: A case study of PPI working.PPI-助力-以公平和尊重规划我们的工作:PPI工作的一个案例研究
Res Involv Engagem. 2025 May 30;11(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00723-1.
作为参与研究的成果的学习:对实践、报告和评估有何影响?
Res Involv Engagem. 2019 Mar 12;5:14. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0147-1. eCollection 2019.
4
Patient Participation at Health Care Conferences: Engaged Patients Increase Information Flow, Expand Propagation, and Deepen Engagement in the Conversation of Tweets Compared to Physicians or Researchers.患者在医疗保健会议中的参与度:与医生或研究人员相比,积极参与的患者能增加信息流通、扩大传播范围并加深在推文对话中的参与度。
J Med Internet Res. 2017 Aug 17;19(8):e280. doi: 10.2196/jmir.8049.
5
From tokenism to empowerment: progressing patient and public involvement in healthcare improvement.从象征主义到赋权:推动患者及公众参与医疗保健改善
BMJ Qual Saf. 2016 Aug;25(8):626-32. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004839. Epub 2016 Mar 18.
6
A systematic review of the impact of patient and public involvement on service users, researchers and communities.患者和公众参与对服务使用者、研究人员和社区影响的系统评价。
Patient. 2014;7(4):387-95. doi: 10.1007/s40271-014-0065-0.
7
Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review.探究患者及公众参与对健康和社会照护研究的影响:一项系统综述
Health Expect. 2014 Oct;17(5):637-50. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
8
Community involvement in hospital governance in Britain: evidence from before the National Health Service.英国社区参与医院管理:国民医疗服务体系建立之前的证据
Int J Health Serv. 2008;38(4):751-71. doi: 10.2190/HS.38.4.j.
9
Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management.公众参与卫生服务管理中的代表性、合法性与权力
Soc Sci Med. 2008 Dec;67(11):1757-65. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2008.09.024. Epub 2008 Oct 14.
10
Should patients have a role in patient safety? A safety engineering view.患者在患者安全中应发挥作用吗?一种安全工程视角。
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Apr;16(2):140-2. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.018861.