Nguyen Helen, Kha Richard, Gopinath Bamini, Mitchell Paul, Liew Gerald
Westmead Institute for Medical Research, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
The George Institute, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e089518. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-089518.
Diabetic macular oedema (DMO), a serious ocular complication of diabetic retinopathy (DR), is a leading cause of vision impairment worldwide. If left untreated or inadequately treated, DMO can lead to irreversible vision loss and blindness. Intravitreal injections using antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) and laser are the current standard of treatment for DMO. These treatments are costly and invasive and must be repeated over several years with a high service load. Fenofibrate has been shown to reduce the progression of DR. However, there is a lack of high-quality data on the effects of fenofibrate on established DMO. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of oral fenofibrate for the treatment of DMO.
This randomised double-blind, placebo-controlled trial recruited 204 patients with DMO across three different clinics in Sydney. Participants will be randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to intervention and control groups. The intervention group will receive oral fenofibrate (145 mg) taken once daily for 24 months, while the control group will receive placebo tablets taken once daily for 24 months. Standard care with anti-VEGF injections, focal lasers or observation will also be provided to all participants regardless of their group allocation. The primary outcome is the reduction in DMO measured using central macular subfield thickness (CSMT) on optical coherence tomography imaging at 24 months. Secondary outcomes at 24 months include the proportion of eyes with CSMT <250 µm, number of anti-VEGF injections, number of laser sessions needed, best-corrected visual acuity letter score gains, rates of adverse events, progression in DR lesions and changes in quality of life measures. Comparison between groups will be evaluated using analysis of variance. Multiple regression analyses adjusting for age, glycated haemoglobin, number of injections and other covariates will also be performed.
Ethics approval has been granted by the University of Sydney Human Ethics Committee (HREC-2019/892), and the trial has been registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12618000592246). The study adheres to the principles of the Helsinki Declaration and the National Health and Medical Research Council National Statement on Ethical Conduct in Human Research. Trial results will be disseminated to the public in de-identified form through publications in peer-reviewed journals.
Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry.
ACTRN12618000592246.
糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DMO)是糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的一种严重眼部并发症,是全球视力损害的主要原因。如果不进行治疗或治疗不充分,DMO可导致不可逆转的视力丧失和失明。玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子(anti-VEGF)和激光治疗是目前DMO的标准治疗方法。这些治疗成本高昂且具有侵入性,并且必须在数年中反复进行,服务负担很重。非诺贝特已被证明可减缓DR的进展。然而,关于非诺贝特对已确诊的DMO的影响,缺乏高质量的数据。本研究旨在评估口服非诺贝特治疗DMO的有效性。
这项随机双盲、安慰剂对照试验在悉尼的三个不同诊所招募了204例DMO患者。参与者将按1:1的比例随机分配到干预组和对照组。干预组将接受口服非诺贝特(145毫克),每日一次,共24个月,而对照组将接受安慰剂片,每日一次,共服用24个月。无论其分组如何,所有参与者都将接受抗VEGF注射、局部激光治疗或观察等标准治疗。主要结局是在24个月时通过光学相干断层扫描成像测量的中心黄斑子区域厚度(CSMT)来评估DMO的减轻情况。24个月时的次要结局包括CSMT<250μm的眼睛比例;抗VEGF注射次数、所需激光治疗次数、最佳矫正视力字母评分增加情况、不良事件发生率、DR病变进展情况以及生活质量指标的变化。将使用方差分析评估组间差异。还将进行多元回归分析,对年龄、糖化血红蛋白、注射次数和其他协变量进行校正。
悉尼大学人类伦理委员会(HREC-2019/892)已批准伦理审查,该试验已在澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心(ACTRN12618000592246)注册。本研究遵循《赫尔辛基宣言》的原则以及澳大利亚国家卫生与医学研究委员会关于人类研究伦理行为的国家声明。试验结果将以去识别化的形式通过在同行评审期刊上发表向公众传播。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册中心。
ACTRN12618000592246。