文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

绩效理解与学习系统(PULSE-KEY):用于医疗服务提供模式实施与绩效评估的框架开发

Performance Understanding and Learning System (PULSE-KEY): development of a framework for implementation and performance evaluation of healthcare delivery models of care.

作者信息

Mutsekwa Rumbidzai N, Campbell Katrina L, Canavan Russell, Angus Rebecca L, McBride Liza-Jane, Byrnes Joshua

机构信息

Gold Coast Hospital, Gold Coast, Brisbane, Australia

Healthcare Excellence and Innovation, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e088663. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088663.


DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088663
PMID:39806657
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11667376/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Efficient performance evaluation is essential for driving improvement, ensuring accountability and optimisation of outcomes in healthcare delivery. However, its complexity often leads to ineffective implementation. This article aims to advance the field of performance measurement within alternative healthcare delivery models of care through the development and validation of a comprehensive evaluation framework. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A seven-stage methodological approach was adapted from the Health Care Quality Indicators Project and a conceptual analysis method. The first three stages, which have been previously published, included: (1) an extensive literature review, (2) engagement with consumers and patients through interviews and a discrete choice experiment and (3) involvement of stakeholders across the healthcare system via interviews and surveys. Building on this previous work, the present study advances the framework development through four additional stages: (4) development of a conceptual framework (identifying, categorising, synthesising concepts into outcome domains), (5) expert consultation, (6) validation using a real-world case study and (7) refinement for practical applicability and effectiveness in evaluating alternative healthcare delivery models of care. RESULTS: The framework was developed by synthesising insights from phases 1-3 of our previously published work and refined through consultations with 25 experts, confirming its relevance, clarity and suitability for diverse audiences. This study also details the framework's validation, refinement and finalisation process. The final framework is structured around eight primary domains, covering implementation outcomes, effectiveness, safety, patient-centredness, healthcare provider experience, access, service delivery and economic evaluation. Within the implementation outcomes domain, three subdomains-adoptability, implementability and sustainability-are further delineated, providing a comprehensive assessment. CONCLUSIONS: The comprehensive evaluation framework developed in this study provides a vital tool for enhancing implementation and performance measurement in alternative healthcare delivery models. By integrating insights from various stakeholders, the framework promotes data-driven decisions on adopting, implementing and sustaining various healthcare delivery models. Through systematic application, this framework aims to drive tangible enhancements in patient outcomes, improve healthcare provider experiences, and optimise overall healthcare system efficiency.

摘要

目标:高效的绩效评估对于推动医疗服务的改进、确保问责制以及优化医疗服务结果至关重要。然而,其复杂性常常导致实施效果不佳。本文旨在通过开发和验证一个全面的评估框架,推动替代医疗服务模式下的绩效衡量领域的发展。 设计与参与者:采用了来自医疗质量指标项目的七阶段方法和概念分析方法。前三个阶段(已发表)包括:(1)广泛的文献综述,(2)通过访谈和离散选择实验与消费者和患者进行互动,(3)通过访谈和调查让医疗系统中的利益相关者参与进来。基于此前的工作,本研究通过另外四个阶段推进框架开发:(4)概念框架的开发(识别、分类、将概念综合到结果领域),(5)专家咨询,(6)使用实际案例研究进行验证,(7)为评估替代医疗服务模式的实际适用性和有效性进行完善。 结果:该框架是通过综合我们此前发表工作的第1至3阶段的见解而开发的,并通过与25位专家的磋商进行了完善,证实了其对不同受众的相关性、清晰度和适用性。本研究还详细介绍了框架的验证、完善和定稿过程。最终框架围绕八个主要领域构建,涵盖实施结果、有效性、安全性、以患者为中心、医疗服务提供者体验、可及性、服务提供和经济评估。在实施结果领域内,进一步划分了三个子领域——可采用性、可实施性和可持续性——以提供全面评估。 结论:本研究中开发的综合评估框架为加强替代医疗服务模式中的实施和绩效衡量提供了一个重要工具。通过整合来自不同利益相关者的见解,该框架促进了关于采用、实施和维持各种医疗服务模式的数据驱动决策。通过系统应用,该框架旨在切实改善患者结果,提升医疗服务提供者体验,并优化整体医疗系统效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/cba82789dc95/bmjopen-14-12-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/0a5090f70b58/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/1c1e0ef94ec1/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/0d0dd6af4501/bmjopen-14-12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/704b1ae826bb/bmjopen-14-12-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/cba82789dc95/bmjopen-14-12-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/0a5090f70b58/bmjopen-14-12-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/1c1e0ef94ec1/bmjopen-14-12-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/0d0dd6af4501/bmjopen-14-12-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/704b1ae826bb/bmjopen-14-12-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a3ad/11667376/cba82789dc95/bmjopen-14-12-g005.jpg

相似文献

[1]
Performance Understanding and Learning System (PULSE-KEY): development of a framework for implementation and performance evaluation of healthcare delivery models of care.

BMJ Open. 2024-12-20

[2]
Feasibility and Applicability of Implementing the Framework for Comprehensive Understanding of Structural Stigma in Mental Healthcare Systems: A Case Example of Nepal.

Health Expect. 2025-2

[3]
Enhancing Serious Game Design: Expert-Reviewed, Stakeholder-Centered Framework.

JMIR Serious Games. 2024-5-31

[4]
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.

JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015-1

[5]
Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update.

Health Technol Assess. 2021-9

[6]
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of paramedics working in general practice: a mixed-methods realist evaluation.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025-2

[7]
Critical Care Network in the State of Qatar.

Qatar Med J. 2019-11-7

[8]
Better Measurement for Performance Improvement in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: The Primary Health Care Performance Initiative (PHCPI) Experience of Conceptual Framework Development and Indicator Selection.

Milbank Q. 2017-12

[9]
Consumers' and health providers' views and perceptions of partnering to improve health services design, delivery and evaluation: a co-produced qualitative evidence synthesis.

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023-3-14

[10]
Using Palliative Care Needs Rounds in the UK for care home staff and residents: an implementation science study.

Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024-7

引用本文的文献

[1]
Role of the Dietitian in the Inflammatory Bowel Disease Multidisciplinary Team.

J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2025-9

本文引用的文献

[1]
Unlocking potential: a qualitative exploration guiding the implementation and evaluation of professional role substitution models in healthcare.

Implement Sci Commun. 2024-7-12

[2]
Measuring performance in allied health professional role substitution models of care: a clinician survey.

BMC Health Serv Res. 2024-1-16

[3]
Innovative models of healthcare delivery: an umbrella review of reviews.

BMJ Open. 2023-2-23

[4]
Patient Preferences for Attributes that Characterise Alternative Models of Care in Gastroenterology: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Patient. 2023-3

[5]
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.

Implement Sci. 2022-10-29

[6]
Transforming healthcare through a digital revolution: A review of digital healthcare technologies and solutions.

Front Digit Health. 2022-8-4

[7]
Role substitution of specialist medical doctors with allied-health professionals: A qualitative exploration of patients' experiences and perceptions of healthcare quality.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2022-12

[8]
Measuring performance of professional role substitution models of care against traditional medical care in healthcare-A systematic review.

J Eval Clin Pract. 2022-4

[9]
Health service usage and re-referral rates: comparison of a dietitian-first clinic with a medical specialist-first model of care in a cohort of gastroenterology patients.

Frontline Gastroenterol. 2020-5-6

[10]
The Implementation Research Logic Model: a method for planning, executing, reporting, and synthesizing implementation projects.

Implement Sci. 2020-9-25

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索