Williams-Thomas Rhys, Townson Julia, Lewis Ruth, Copeland Lauren, Madan Jason, Melendez-Torres G J, Lugg-Widger Fiona V, Pallmann Philip, Riaz Muhammad, Brown Rachel, Bonell Chris, Morgan Gemma S, White James, Young Honor
Centre for Trials Research, Cardiff University College of Biomedical and Life Sciences, Cardiff, UK.
Institute of Health and Wellbeing, MRC Social and Public Health Sciences Unit, Glasgow, UK.
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 20;14(12):e091355. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-091355.
To examine the acceptability of implementing, trialling and estimating the cost of the Sexual health and healthy relationships for Further Education (SaFE) intervention.
Two-arm repeated cross-sectional pilot cluster randomised controlled trial (cRCT) of SaFE compared with usual practice, including a process evaluation and an economic assessment.
Eight further education (FE) settings in South Wales and the West of England, UK.
FE students, staff and sexual health nurses.
SaFE had three components: (1) onsite access to sexual health and relationship services provided by sexual health nurses available for 2 hours on 2 days per week; (2) publicity about onsite sexual health and relationship services and (3) FE staff training on how to promote sexual health, and recognise, prevent and respond to dating and relationship violence (DRV) and sexual harassment.
The primary outcome was feasibility, assessing whether the study met progression criteria relating to: (a) FE setting and student recruitment; (b) the acceptability of the intervention and (c) qualitative data, and documentary evidence from students, staff and sexual health nurses on acceptability, fidelity of implementation and receipt. We also assessed the completeness of primary, secondary and intermediate outcome measures and estimated cost of the intervention.
Three of the four progression criteria were met. Eight FE settings were recruited, randomised and retained. Of the students approached, 60.7% (1124/1852 students) at baseline and 51.9% (1139/2193 students) at 12 month follow-up completed the questionnaire (target 60%). Over 80% of onsite sexual health services were attended by a nurse; onsite publicity about sexual health services was observed at all intervention settings and 137 staff were trained. SaFE was viewed positively by FE students, FE staff and nurses but needed more time to embed. The prevalence of self-reported unprotected sex at last intercourse was 15.5% at baseline and 18.7% at follow-up. There was evidence of floor effects in the measure of DRV victimisation in the last 12 months. We found low rates of missing data for almost all variables with no discernible differences across arms. The estimated cost per FE setting was £38,363.09.
SaFE was implemented and well received by students, staff and nurses. If strategies to boost student recruitment to the survey can be identified, progression to a phase III effectiveness trial of SaFE is warranted.
ISRCTN54793810.
研究实施、试行并评估继续教育阶段性健康与健康关系干预措施(SaFE)的可接受性及成本。
将SaFE与常规做法进行对比的双臂重复横断面试点整群随机对照试验(cRCT),包括过程评估和经济评估。
英国南威尔士和英格兰西部的八所继续教育机构。
继续教育学生、教职员工及性健康护士。
SaFE包括三个组成部分:(1)每周两天、每天2小时由性健康护士提供现场性健康及关系服务;(2)宣传现场性健康及关系服务;(3)对继续教育教职员工进行培训,内容包括如何促进性健康,以及识别、预防和应对约会及关系暴力(DRV)和性骚扰。
主要结局为可行性,评估该研究是否符合以下方面的进展标准:(a)继续教育机构及学生招募情况;(b)干预措施的可接受性;(c)定性数据,以及来自学生、教职员工和性健康护士关于可接受性、实施保真度及接受情况的书面证据。我们还评估了主要、次要和中间结局指标的完整性,并估算了干预措施的成本。
四项进展标准中的三项得到满足。招募、随机分组并保留了八所继续教育机构。在被邀请的学生中,基线时60.7%(1124/1852名学生),12个月随访时51.9%(1139/2193名学生)完成了问卷(目标为60%)。超过80%的现场性健康服务有护士提供;在所有干预机构均观察到了关于性健康服务的现场宣传,137名工作人员接受了培训。继续教育学生、教职员工和护士对SaFE的评价积极,但需要更多时间来深入实施。末次性交时自我报告的未采取保护措施性行为的发生率在基线时为15.5%,随访时为18.7%。有证据表明在过去12个月DRV受害情况的测量中存在地板效应。我们发现几乎所有变量的缺失数据率都很低,各臂之间没有明显差异。每个继续教育机构估计成本为38,363.09英镑。
SaFE已实施并受到学生、教职员工和护士的好评。如果能确定提高学生参与调查招募率的策略,那么有必要推进到SaFE的III期有效性试验。
ISRCTN54793810