• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

产前咨询中的自主性支持:产科护理的一项定量观察研究。

Autonomy support in prenatal consultation: A quantitative observation study in maternity care.

作者信息

Kors Joyce, Martin Linda, Verhoeven Corine J, Henrichs Jens, Peerdeman Saskia M, Kusurkar Rashmi A

机构信息

Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Research in Education, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

LEARN! Research Institute for Learning and Education, Faculty of Psychology and Education, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Jan 13;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/197053. eCollection 2025.

DOI:10.18332/ejm/197053
PMID:39807093
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11726625/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Maternity care professionals need to guide women through an increasing number of decision-making processes during pregnancy. Professionals tend to focus more on providing information than on decision support. According to the self-determination theory (SDT), professionals could help women make their own choices by fulfilling their three basic psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness through autonomy-supportive interactions. This study aimed to quantify autonomy-supportive and autonomy-thwarting interactions that professionals use during prenatal consultations and their association with women's perceptions of the healthcare climate during consultations.

METHODS

A quantitative observation study with a cross-sectional design was conducted in the Netherlands from March to October 2020. Twenty-three maternity care professionals in 2 hospitals and 16 midwifery practices were purposefully sampled. During 104 prenatal consultations, professional interactions were audiotaped and coded using the Coding and Observing Need-Supportive Consultation in Maternity Care Consultations. The woman's perceived healthcare climate was assessed using the Healthcare Climate Questionnaire.

RESULTS

We observed that professionals derive their autonomy-supportive interactions from a small repertoire. They tend to use more autonomy-supportive interactions (mean=2.31, SD=0.58) that give room to the woman than interactions that stimulate active engagement (mean=1.41, SD=0.80). During structuring interactions, they tend to use more informative (mean=1.81, SD=0.59) than supportive interactions (mean=0.94, SD=0.55). Women generally perceived the healthcare climate as positive.

CONCLUSIONS

Women were rarely stimulated to be actively engaged in the consultations, while active woman engagement is vital in offering women-centered decision-making support. Professionals could improve their autonomy-supportive consultation climate by paying explicit attention to interactions involving women and offering structure.

摘要

引言

产科护理专业人员需要在孕期引导女性经历越来越多的决策过程。专业人员往往更侧重于提供信息,而不是决策支持。根据自我决定理论(SDT),专业人员可以通过自主性支持性互动来满足女性的三种基本心理需求:自主性、能力感和关联性,从而帮助女性做出自己的选择。本研究旨在量化专业人员在产前咨询期间使用的自主性支持性和自主性阻碍性互动,以及它们与女性对咨询期间医疗氛围的感知之间的关联。

方法

2020年3月至10月在荷兰进行了一项采用横断面设计的定量观察研究。从2家医院和16家助产机构中有意抽取了23名产科护理专业人员。在104次产前咨询期间,使用《产科护理咨询中编码和观察需求支持性咨询》对专业人员的互动进行录音和编码。使用《医疗氛围问卷》评估女性对医疗氛围的感知。

结果

我们观察到,专业人员的自主性支持性互动方式有限。他们倾向于使用更多给予女性空间的自主性支持性互动(均值=2.31,标准差=0.58),而不是激发积极参与的互动(均值=1.41,标准差=0.80)。在构建互动时,他们倾向于使用更多提供信息的互动(均值=1.81,标准差=0.59),而不是支持性互动(均值=0.94,标准差=0.55)。女性总体上认为医疗氛围是积极的。

结论

女性很少被激发积极参与咨询,而女性的积极参与对于提供以女性为中心的决策支持至关重要。专业人员可以通过明确关注与女性的互动并提供结构来改善他们的自主性支持性咨询氛围。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11726625/153b02ce8f60/EJM-9-03-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11726625/d45a6ef275a4/EJM-9-03-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11726625/153b02ce8f60/EJM-9-03-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11726625/d45a6ef275a4/EJM-9-03-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1691/11726625/153b02ce8f60/EJM-9-03-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Autonomy support in prenatal consultation: A quantitative observation study in maternity care.产前咨询中的自主性支持:产科护理的一项定量观察研究。
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Jan 13;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/197053. eCollection 2025.
2
Autonomy-supportive decision-making in maternity care during prenatal consultations: a qualitative interaction analysis.产前咨询中母婴保健中的自主支持决策:定性互动分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e063463. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063463.
3
Structural equation modeling for associated factors with self-care behavior among young and middle-aged hypertensive patients: a cross-sectional study.结构方程模型分析中青年高血压患者自我护理行为的相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Contemp Nurse. 2023 Apr;59(2):99-113. doi: 10.1080/10376178.2023.2226252. Epub 2023 Jun 19.
4
The Mother's Autonomy in Decision Making (MADM) scale: Patient-led development and psychometric testing of a new instrument to evaluate experience of maternity care.母亲决策自主权(MADM)量表:一种用于评估产妇护理体验的新工具的患者主导开发及心理测量测试
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 23;12(2):e0171804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171804. eCollection 2017.
5
Maternity care providers' perceptions of women's autonomy and the law.产妇保健提供者对妇女自主权和法律的看法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Apr 4;13:84. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-84.
6
Factors influencing autonomy supportive consultation: A realist review.影响自主支持型咨询的因素:一个现实主义的综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2069-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 May 14.
7
Patient-led decision making: Measuring autonomy and respect in Canadian maternity care.患者主导的决策:衡量加拿大产科护理中的自主权和尊重。
Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):586-594. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2018.10.023. Epub 2018 Nov 2.
8
Labouring Together: Women's experiences of "Getting the care that I want and need" in maternity care.共同努力:女性在分娩护理中获得“我想要和需要的护理”的体验。
Midwifery. 2022 Oct;113:103420. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2022.103420. Epub 2022 Jul 2.
9
Promoting and supporting self-management for adults living in the community with physical chronic illness: A systematic review of the effectiveness and meaningfulness of the patient-practitioner encounter.促进和支持社区中患有慢性身体疾病的成年人进行自我管理:对医患互动的有效性和意义的系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(13):492-582. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907130-00001.
10
Adaptation and validation of the encoding of observations using CONSUL-MCC: A self-determination theory-based tool to observe consultations in maternity care.使用CONSUL-MCC对观察结果编码进行调整与验证:一种基于自我决定理论的产科护理会诊观察工具。
PEC Innov. 2023 Sep 21;3:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100219. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Adaptation and validation of the encoding of observations using CONSUL-MCC: A self-determination theory-based tool to observe consultations in maternity care.使用CONSUL-MCC对观察结果编码进行调整与验证:一种基于自我决定理论的产科护理会诊观察工具。
PEC Innov. 2023 Sep 21;3:100219. doi: 10.1016/j.pecinn.2023.100219. eCollection 2023 Dec 15.
2
Consent and refusal of procedures during labour and birth: a survey among 11 418 women in the Netherlands.分娩过程中对医疗操作的同意与拒绝:荷兰 11418 名女性的调查。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2024 Jul 22;33(8):511-522. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2022-015538.
3
Conditions for autonomous reproductive decision-making in prenatal screening: A mixed methods study.
产前筛查中自主生殖决策的条件:一项混合方法研究。
Midwifery. 2023 Apr;119:103607. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2023.103607. Epub 2023 Jan 27.
4
Model of care matters: An integrative review.照护模式很重要:一项综合述评。
Women Birth. 2023 Jul;36(4):315-326. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2022.12.007. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
5
Autonomy-supportive decision-making in maternity care during prenatal consultations: a qualitative interaction analysis.产前咨询中母婴保健中的自主支持决策:定性互动分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 Nov 16;12(11):e063463. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-063463.
6
Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review.将个人观点启发引入到共同决策的核心:一项范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Sep;105(9):2860-2870. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 16.
7
Do consultants do what they say they do? Observational study of the extent to which clinicians involve their patients in the decision-making process.顾问是否言行一致?观察性研究临床医生在决策过程中让患者参与的程度。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jan 5;12(1):e056471. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056471.
8
Clients' perspectives on the quality of counseling for prenatal anomaly screening. A comparison between 2011 and 2019.客户对产前异常筛查咨询质量的看法。2011 年和 2019 年的比较。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1796-1805. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.012. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
9
Self-Determination Theory to observe healthcare professionals' counselling in chronic care encounters: Development of the COUNSEL-CCE tool.自主决定理论观察慢性病护理中的医疗保健专业人员的咨询:COUNSEL-CCE 工具的开发。
Patient Educ Couns. 2021 Jul;104(7):1773-1780. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.12.002. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
10
Factors influencing autonomy supportive consultation: A realist review.影响自主支持型咨询的因素:一个现实主义的综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2020 Oct;103(10):2069-2077. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2020.04.019. Epub 2020 May 14.