• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

将个人观点启发引入到共同决策的核心:一项范围综述。

Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review.

机构信息

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Knowledge Institute of Medical Specialists, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Sep;105(9):2860-2870. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009
PMID:35659466
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Proponents of shared decision-making (SDM) advocate the elicitation of the patient's perspective. This scoping review explores if, and to what extent, the personal perspectives of patients are elicited during a clinical encounter, as part of a SDM process. We define personal perspective elicitation (PPE) as: the disclosure (either elicited by the clinician or spontaneously expressed by the patient) of information related to the patient's personal preferences, values and/or context.

METHODS

A search was conducted in five literature databases from inception dates up to July 2020, to identify empirical studies about SDM (with/without SDM instrument).

RESULTS

The search identified 4562 abstracts; 263 articles were read in full text, resulting in 99 included studies. Studies reported low levels of PPE. Integration of personal perspectives into the conversation or a future care plan was largely absent. The majority of the discussed content related to physical health, while social and psychological topics were mostly unaddressed.

CONCLUSIONS

PPE occurs on a very low level in efforts to achieve SDM according to evaluation studies.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

PPE is advocated but rarely achieved in SDM evaluation studies. Causes should be identified, followed by designing interventions to improve this aspect of SDM.

摘要

目的

支持共享决策(SDM)的人提倡引出患者的观点。本范围综述探讨了在临床就诊过程中,是否以及在何种程度上引出了患者的个人观点,作为 SDM 过程的一部分。我们将个人观点引出(PPE)定义为:披露与患者的个人偏好、价值观和/或背景相关的信息(由临床医生引出或患者自发表达)。

方法

从五个文献数据库中进行了搜索,时间从创建日期到 2020 年 7 月,以确定有关 SDM(有/没有 SDM 工具)的实证研究。

结果

搜索确定了 4562 篇摘要;阅读了 263 篇全文,最终纳入了 99 项研究。研究报告称 PPE 水平较低。将个人观点纳入对话或未来的护理计划中基本不存在。讨论的内容大多与身体健康有关,而社会和心理话题大多未涉及。

结论

根据评估研究,在实现 SDM 的努力中,PPE 的发生水平非常低。应确定原因,然后设计干预措施来改善 SDM 的这一方面。

实践意义

在 SDM 评估研究中,提倡但很少实现 PPE。应确定原因,然后设计干预措施来改善 SDM 的这一方面。

相似文献

1
Bringing personal perspective elicitation to the heart of shared decision-making: A scoping review.将个人观点启发引入到共同决策的核心:一项范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2022 Sep;105(9):2860-2870. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2022.05.009. Epub 2022 May 16.
2
Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations.荷兰医患互动探索性观察研究:在真实的录音咨询中作为共同决策的一部分,对个人观点启发的操作化。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e079540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079540.
3
Shared decision making in surgery: a scoping review of patient and surgeon preferences.手术中的共同决策:患者和外科医生偏好的范围综述。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Aug 12;20(1):190. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01211-0.
4
Shared decision-making in neurosurgery: a scoping review.神经外科中的共享决策:范围综述。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2021 Sep;163(9):2371-2382. doi: 10.1007/s00701-021-04867-3. Epub 2021 May 3.
5
"I need to know what makes somebody tick …": Challenges and Strategies of Implementing Shared Decision-Making in Individualized Oncology.“我需要知道是什么在驱动着……”:个体化肿瘤学中实施共享决策的挑战与策略。
Oncologist. 2019 Apr;24(4):555-562. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0615. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
6
Exploration of shared decision making in oncology within the United States: a scoping review.美国肿瘤学中共享决策制定的探索:范围综述。
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Dec 31;31(1):94. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07556-8.
7
Shared Decision Making Among Racially and/or Ethnically Diverse Populations in Primary Care: A Scoping Review of Barriers and Facilitators.初级保健中不同种族和/或族裔人群的共同决策:障碍与促进因素的范围综述
Ann Fam Med. 2025 Mar 24;23(2):108-116. doi: 10.1370/afm.240087.
8
Shared decision-making for people with asthma.哮喘患者的共同决策
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Oct 3;10(10):CD012330. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012330.pub2.
9
Shared decision making with black patients: A scoping review.与黑人患者的共同决策:一项范围综述。
Patient Educ Couns. 2023 May;110:107646. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2023.107646. Epub 2023 Jan 25.
10
Shared decision-making for supporting women's decisions about breast cancer screening.支持女性进行乳腺癌筛查决策的共享决策。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 10;5(5):CD013822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013822.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimizing risk-reducing surgery and aspirin decision aids for Lynch syndrome carriers using the person-based approach: A think-aloud interview study.采用基于个体的方法优化林奇综合征携带者的降低风险手术和阿司匹林决策辅助工具:一项出声思考访谈研究。
J Genet Couns. 2025 Aug;34(4):e70089. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.70089.
2
From Burden to Empowerment. Patient-Reported Influencing Factors on Participation in Shared Decision Making in Oncology, a Meta-Study.从负担到赋权:患者报告的肿瘤学共同决策参与影响因素的元研究
Psychooncology. 2025 Jul;34(7):e70218. doi: 10.1002/pon.70218.
3
Professionals' and Families' Perspectives on Essential Elements of Shared Decision-Making: A Qualitative Analysis on Families with Multiple and Enduring Problems in Integrated Youth Care.
专业人士和家庭对共同决策基本要素的看法:对综合青少年护理中存在多重和持久问题家庭的定性分析
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Apr 30. doi: 10.1007/s10488-025-01443-0.
4
Navigating Power Imbalances and Stigma in Mental Healthcare. Patient-Reported Barriers and Facilitators to Participation in Shared Decision-Making in Mental Health Care, a Qualitative Meta-Summary.应对精神卫生保健中的权力失衡和污名化。患者报告的参与精神卫生保健共同决策的障碍和促进因素,一项定性元综述。
Health Expect. 2025 Apr;28(2):e70239. doi: 10.1111/hex.70239.
5
Autonomy support in prenatal consultation: A quantitative observation study in maternity care.产前咨询中的自主性支持:产科护理的一项定量观察研究。
Eur J Midwifery. 2025 Jan 13;9. doi: 10.18332/ejm/197053. eCollection 2025.
6
Shared decision-making in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of patients' preferences and healthcare providers' perspectives.2型糖尿病中的共同决策:对患者偏好和医疗服务提供者观点的系统评价
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jan 7;25(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12160-z.
7
Visual decision aids to support communication and shared decision-making: How are they valued and used in practice?支持沟通与共同决策的视觉决策辅助工具:它们在实践中如何被重视和使用?
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 3;19(12):e0314732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314732. eCollection 2024.
8
Patient Preferences Influencing Treatment Decision-Making in Early-Stage Breast Cancer in Germany, Italy, and Japan.德国、意大利和日本早期乳腺癌患者偏好对治疗决策的影响
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2024 Jul 25;18:1517-1530. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S450316. eCollection 2024.
9
Explorative observational study of Dutch patient-clinician interactions: operationalisation of personal perspective elicitation as part of shared decision-making in real-life audio-recorded consultations.荷兰医患互动探索性观察研究:在真实的录音咨询中作为共同决策的一部分,对个人观点启发的操作化。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 16;14(5):e079540. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079540.
10
Experiences of Clients and Professionals with the Recovery Oriented Intake.客户和专业人员对以康复为导向的入院体验。
Community Ment Health J. 2024 Jul;60(5):985-996. doi: 10.1007/s10597-024-01250-1. Epub 2024 Feb 24.