Suppr超能文献

不同类型的血流限制袖带对心率和血压的反应有所不同。

Heart Rate and Blood Pressure Responses Vary Between Blood Flow Restriction Cuff Type.

作者信息

Rincon-Garcia Daniela, Hafler Abbey C, Rodriguez Rebecca F, Marshall Erica M

机构信息

Exercise Science, Florida Southern College, Lakeland, FL, USA.

Department of Health, Human Performance, and Recreation, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.

出版信息

Int J Exerc Sci. 2024 Dec 1;17(2):1568-1576. doi: 10.70252/MQOB1046. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to compare heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) following high load resistance exercise (HLRE) and blood flow restriction exercise (BFRE) with a knee wrap (kBFRE) and pneumatic cuff (pBFRE). Eleven men (N = 9) and women (N = 2) participated. HR, SBP, and DBP were collected at Rest, immediately post exercise (IP), 10-, 30-, and 45-minutes post exercise. Repeated measures ANOVAs assessed the effects of condition across time on all variables. Significant effects were examined with pairwise comparisons and a Sidak correction. Significance was defined a priori p ≤ 0.05. There were significant condition by time interactions for HR (p = 0.005; ES = 0.31), SBP (p = 0.016; ES = 0.27), and DBP (p = 0.03; ES = 0.24). There were significant main effects of time for HR (p < 0.001; ES = 0.78), SBP (p < 0.001; ES = 0.84), and DBP (p = 0.004; ES = 0.44). The HR was increased from Rest for up to 45 minutes across all conditions. IP, the HR was lower following pBFRE compared to HLRE. There was an increase in SBP at IP. SBP was higher following HLRE compared to kBFRE and pBFRE. DBP was decreased at 10 minutes across all conditions, with kBFRE prompting larger reductions compared to HLRE at 10 minutes. DBP was lower following kBFRE compared to pBFRE at 45 minutes. This study suggests that BFRE alters cardiovascular function differently than HLRE, but is dependent on cuff type. Specifically, pneumatic cuffs may attenuate the increase in the HR and SBP response, and knee wraps augment the reduction in DBP.

摘要

本研究的目的是比较高负荷抗阻运动(HLRE)以及使用护膝(kBFRE)和气动袖带(pBFRE)的血流限制运动(BFRE)后的心率(HR)、收缩压(SBP)和舒张压(DBP)。11名男性(N = 9)和女性(N = 2)参与了研究。在静息状态、运动后即刻(IP)、运动后10分钟、30分钟和45分钟收集HR、SBP和DBP。重复测量方差分析评估了不同条件随时间对所有变量的影响。通过成对比较和Sidak校正检验显著效应。显著性定义为先验p≤0.05。HR(p = 0.005;效应量= 0.31)、SBP(p = 0.016;效应量= 0.27)和DBP(p = 0.03;效应量= 0.24)存在显著的条件与时间交互作用。HR(p < 0.001;效应量= 0.78)、SBP(p < 0.001;效应量= 0.84)和DBP(p = 0.004;效应量= 0.44)存在显著的时间主效应。在所有条件下,HR从静息状态开始升高,持续长达45分钟。在IP时,与HLRE相比,pBFRE后的HR较低。IP时SBP升高。与kBFRE和pBFRE相比,HLRE后的SBP更高。在所有条件下,DBP在10分钟时下降,与HLRE相比,kBFRE在10分钟时促使更大幅度的下降。在45分钟时,与pBFRE相比,kBFRE后的DBP更低。本研究表明,BFRE对心血管功能的影响与HLRE不同,但取决于袖带类型。具体而言,气动袖带可能会减弱HR和SBP反应的增加,而护膝会增强DBP的降低。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

10
Blood flow restriction pressure recommendations: a tale of two cuffs.血流限制压力建议:两种袖带的故事。
Front Physiol. 2013 Sep 10;4:249. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2013.00249. eCollection 2013.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验