Ma Aobo, Zhang Yiding, Chen Junduo, Sun Lu, Hong Guang
Division for Globalization Initiative, Liaison Center for Innovative Dentistry, Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry, Sendai, Japan.
Department of Periodontology, Shanghai Stomatological Hospital & School of Stomatology, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
J Dent Sci. 2024 Dec;19(Suppl 1):S26-S37. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2024.09.001. Epub 2024 Sep 16.
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Titanium dioxide nanotube (TNT) structures have been shown to enhance the early osseointegration of dental implants. Nevertheless, the optimal nanotube diameter for promoting osteogenesis remains unclear due to variations in cell types and manufacture of nanotubes. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in MC3T3-E1 and Saos-2 cells behavior on nanotubes of varying diameters.
TNT structures were fabricated by anodizing titanium foil at voltages ranging from 15V to 70V and annealed at 450 °C. Surface morphology and wettability were characterized using field emission scanning electron microscopy and water contact angle measurements, respectively. MC3T3-E1 and Saos-2 cells were cultured to evaluate biocompatibility. Early cell morphology and adhesion were visualized by scanning electron microscopy. Cell proliferation was quantified using CCK-8 assays, and differentiation was assessed through alkaline phosphatase assays. Osteogenesis-related gene expression was analyzed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), measuring runt-related transcription factor 2 (Runx-2), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), collagen type 1 (COL-1), osteocalcin (OCN), and Osteopontin (OPN) gene levels.
Our results found that Saos-2 cells may be more suitable for TNT-related studies compared to MC3T3-E1 cells. Notably, the 65V nanotube group, with a diameter of 135.9 ± 15.83 nm, demonstrated the most significant osteogenic effect in our assays.
We propose that the use and screening of multiple cell lines prior to the evaluation of biomaterials can lead to more accurate in vitro experiments, thereby enhancing the reliability of biomaterial research.
背景/目的:二氧化钛纳米管(TNT)结构已被证明可增强牙种植体的早期骨整合。然而,由于细胞类型和纳米管制造工艺的差异,促进骨生成的最佳纳米管直径仍不明确。本研究旨在评估MC3T3-E1细胞和Saos-2细胞在不同直径纳米管上行为的差异。
通过在15V至70V的电压下对钛箔进行阳极氧化制备TNT结构,并在450℃下退火。分别使用场发射扫描电子显微镜和水接触角测量来表征表面形态和润湿性。培养MC3T3-E1细胞和Saos-2细胞以评估生物相容性。通过扫描电子显微镜观察早期细胞形态和黏附情况。使用CCK-8法对细胞增殖进行定量,并通过碱性磷酸酶测定评估分化情况。通过实时聚合酶链反应(PCR)分析成骨相关基因表达,测量 runt相关转录因子2(Runx-2)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、1型胶原(COL-1)、骨钙素(OCN)和骨桥蛋白(OPN)基因水平。
我们的结果发现,与MC3T3-E1细胞相比,Saos-2细胞可能更适合TNT相关研究。值得注意的是,直径为135.9±15.83nm的65V纳米管组在我们的实验中表现出最显著的成骨作用。
我们建议在评估生物材料之前使用和筛选多种细胞系可以导致更准确的体外实验,从而提高生物材料研究的可靠性。