Tang Vivian, Zhang Kevin Y, Mirchia Kanish, Lu Rufei, Guney Ekin, Terry Merryl, Ligon Azra H, Ligon Keith L, Eberhart Charles G, Perry Arie, Lucas Calixto-Hope G
Department of Pathology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.
Am J Surg Pathol. 2025 Apr 1;49(4):347-352. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000002353. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
Low-grade gliomas and reactive piloid gliosis can present with overlapping features on conventional histology. Given the large implications for patient treatment, there is a need for effective methods to discriminate these morphologically similar but clinically distinct entities. Using routinely available stains, we hypothesize that a limited panel including SOX10, p16, and cyclin D1 may be useful in differentiating mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase-activated low-grade gliomas from piloid gliosis. Reviewers blinded to clinical and pathologic data reviewed and quantified immunohistochemical expression patterns across 20 cases of piloid gliosis and 37 cases of MAP kinase-activated low-grade gliomas, including pilocytic astrocytoma and ganglioglioma. The majority of MAP kinase-activated low-grade glioma cases demonstrated extensive immunoreactivity for at least 2 of the 3 immunohistochemical markers, whereas none of the gliosis cases demonstrated significant immunoreactivity for more than one individual immunohistochemical marker. SOX10 and p16 demonstrated the highest individual sensitivity whereas cyclin D1 demonstrated the highest individual specificity to discriminate neoplastic from nonneoplastic cases in this cohort. A composite panel score based on significant immunoreactivity of at least 2 of the 3 markers provided specificity and a positive predictive value of 100% in differentiating MAP kinase-activated low-grade glioma from gliosis, as 0/20 (0%) of gliosis cases were scored positive compared with 24/37 (65%) of MAP kinase-activated low-grade glioma cases. We conclude that while the immunoreactivity of these markers may be suggestive of a low-grade glioma diagnosis, SOX10, p16, and cyclin D1 should be applied in combination to maximize diagnostic value.
低级别胶质瘤和反应性毛细胞型胶质增生在传统组织学上可能呈现重叠特征。鉴于对患者治疗有重大影响,需要有效的方法来区分这些形态相似但临床特征不同的实体。我们推测,使用常规可用的染色剂,包括SOX10、p16和细胞周期蛋白D1的有限组合可能有助于区分丝裂原活化蛋白(MAP)激酶激活的低级别胶质瘤与毛细胞型胶质增生。对临床和病理数据不知情的评审人员对20例毛细胞型胶质增生和37例MAP激酶激活的低级别胶质瘤(包括毛细胞型星形细胞瘤和节细胞胶质瘤)的免疫组化表达模式进行了评估和定量。大多数MAP激酶激活的低级别胶质瘤病例对3种免疫组化标志物中的至少2种表现出广泛的免疫反应性,而胶质增生病例中没有一例对超过一种单独的免疫组化标志物表现出显著的免疫反应性。在该队列中,SOX10和p16表现出最高的个体敏感性,而细胞周期蛋白D1在区分肿瘤性与非肿瘤性病例方面表现出最高的个体特异性。基于3种标志物中至少2种的显著免疫反应性的综合组合评分在区分MAP激酶激活的低级别胶质瘤与胶质增生方面提供了100%的特异性和阳性预测值,因为胶质增生病例中0/20(0%)评分呈阳性,而MAP激酶激活的低级别胶质瘤病例中24/37(65%)评分呈阳性。我们得出结论,虽然这些标志物的免疫反应性可能提示低级别胶质瘤的诊断,但应联合应用SOX10、p16和细胞周期蛋白D1以最大化诊断价值。