Pierre Kevin, Raviprasad Abheek, Talati Jay, Amador Isabella, Iakovidis Alexandria, Sistrom Christopher, Slater Roberta, Lanier Linda, Anthony Evelyn, Mancuso Anthony, Rajderkar Dhanashree, Sharma Priya
Department of Radiology, College of Medicine, University of Florida, PO Box 100374, Gainesville, FL, 32610-0374, USA.
Pediatr Radiol. 2025 Mar;55(3):540-545. doi: 10.1007/s00247-024-06158-2. Epub 2025 Jan 14.
To evaluate whether adult and pediatric trauma center status, as well as the presence of dedicated child protection teams, influences radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma on the Emergent/Critical Care Imaging Simulation (WIDI SIM) exam.
We retrospectively analyzed 639 WIDI SIM exam scores for four pediatric non-accidental trauma cases completed by radiology residents across 33 programs. Residents were stratified by level (R1-R4) and institutional factors, including adult trauma center status, pediatric trauma center status, and child protection team presence. Additionally, 2022 pediatric physical abuse counts per state were obtained from the National Child Abuse and Neglect Data System and normalized between 0 and 1. We employed a negative binomial generalized linear model (GLM). The outcome was regressed on resident level, trauma center status variables, child protection team presence, and normalized abuse counts.
Higher resident training level was significantly associated with better performance (R1=3.6, R2=5, R3=6.1, R4=7.9; P<0.001). Adult trauma center accreditation was also associated with higher scores (4.6 vs. 3.3; P<0.001). In contrast, pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and normalized state-level abuse counts were not significantly associated with resident performance (all P>0.05).
Resident experience and adult trauma center accreditation were significantly associated with better radiology resident performance in detecting non-accidental trauma in a simulated call environment. Pediatric trauma center status, child protection team presence, and statewide abuse prevalence were not associated with detection performance. These findings suggest the need for targeted educational interventions at non-adult trauma centers and emphasize the importance of experience in developing diagnostic proficiency for non-accidental trauma.
评估成人和儿科创伤中心的状况以及专门的儿童保护团队的存在,是否会影响放射科住院医师在急诊/重症护理影像模拟(WIDI SIM)考试中检测非意外创伤的表现。
我们回顾性分析了33个项目的放射科住院医师完成的4例儿科非意外创伤病例的639份WIDI SIM考试成绩。住院医师按级别(R1 - R4)和机构因素进行分层,机构因素包括成人创伤中心状况、儿科创伤中心状况和儿童保护团队的存在情况。此外,从国家儿童虐待和忽视数据系统获取了每个州2022年的儿科身体虐待计数,并将其标准化在0到1之间。我们采用了负二项广义线性模型(GLM)。将结果回归到住院医师级别、创伤中心状况变量、儿童保护团队的存在情况和标准化虐待计数上。
住院医师培训水平越高,表现越好(R1 = 3.6,R2 = 5,R3 = 6.1,R4 = 7.9;P < 0.001)。成人创伤中心认证也与更高的分数相关(4.6对3.3;P < 0.001)。相比之下,儿科创伤中心状况、儿童保护团队的存在情况和州级标准化虐待计数与住院医师表现无显著关联(所有P > 0.05)。
在模拟的呼叫环境中,住院医师经验和成人创伤中心认证与放射科住院医师检测非意外创伤的更好表现显著相关。儿科创伤中心状况、儿童保护团队的存在情况和全州虐待患病率与检测表现无关。这些发现表明在非成人创伤中心需要有针对性的教育干预,并强调经验对于培养非意外创伤诊断能力的重要性。