Khatib Sewar, Palgi Yuval, Ashar Yoni K, Polyvyannaya Natalya, Goldstein Pavel
School of Public Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Department of Gerontology, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jan 14;27:e55042. doi: 10.2196/55042.
Increasing life expectancy has led to a rise in nursing home admissions, a context in which older adults often experience chronic physical and mental health conditions, chronic pain, and reduced well-being. Nonpharmacological approaches are especially important for managing older adults' chronic pain, mental health conditions (such as anxiety and depression), and overall well-being, including sensory stimulation (SS) and therapist support (TS). However, the combined effects of SS and TS have not been investigated.
This randomized controlled trial examines the specific and combined effects of brief SS and TS interventions on older adults' physical and mental health and pain intensity levels, among individuals living in nursing homes.
A total of 96 patients aged 65-99 years from a nursing home were randomly assigned to 3 groups: SS, TS, and combined SS+TS interventions, each delivered as four 20-minute sessions. SS was implemented using a multisensory Snoezelen room. Pain intensity levels (per a Visual Analog Scale), blood pressure, heart rate, blood oxygen saturation, and hand grip strength (using a Jamar hand dynamometer) were measured before and after each of the 4 weekly therapeutic sessions. In addition, life satisfaction (per the Satisfaction with Life Scale) and anxiety (per the 7-item General Anxiety Disorder Scale) were evaluated before and after the whole intervention. Mixed model analyses tested the relative efficacy of the 3 interventions, applying simple slope analysis with Tukey correction. Study rationale and analytical plans were preregistered.
The combined intervention of SS and TS (SS+TS) resulted in reduced pain levels compared with SS (B=0.209, P=.006) and TS alone (B=0.23, P=.002) over 4 sessions (F=2.62; P=.017; R=0.23). Further, the combined SS+TS intervention resulted in reduced systolic blood pressure versus SS (B=0.09, P=.01) and TS alone (B=0.016, P<.001) groups (F=5.42; P<.001; R=0.29). In addition, the combined SS+TS intervention resulted in an increased grip strength versus SS (B=-0.35, P=.003) and TS alone (B=-0.032, P=.008) groups (F=2.25; P=.04; R=0.19). Moreover, combined SS+TS resulted in an improvement in life satisfaction (B=-4.29, P<.0001) compared with SS (B=-2.38, P=.0042) and TS alone (B=-1.20, P=.13) groups (F=3.47; P=.04). Finally, SS+TS demonstrated greater improvement in symptoms of general anxiety disorder (B=10.64, P<.0001) compared with SS (B=3.30 P=.01) and TS alone (B=1.13, P=.37) (F=13.5; P<.001) groups. No differences between the interventions were shown for blood oxygen saturation (F=2.06; P=.06), diastolic blood pressure (F=1.12; P=.35), and heart rate (F=1.33; P=.23).
The combined intervention of SS and TS showed therapeutic benefits for pain management and physical and mental health of older adults living in nursing homes, relative to each therapeutic component in isolation. This brief intervention can be readily implemented to improve well-being and optimize therapeutic resources in nursing home settings.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05394389; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05394389.
预期寿命的增加导致养老院入住人数上升,在这种情况下,老年人经常会出现慢性身心健康问题、慢性疼痛和幸福感下降。非药物方法对于管理老年人的慢性疼痛、心理健康状况(如焦虑和抑郁)以及整体幸福感尤为重要,包括感官刺激(SS)和治疗师支持(TS)。然而,SS和TS的联合效果尚未得到研究。
这项随机对照试验研究了简短的SS和TS干预对养老院老年人身心健康和疼痛强度水平的特定及联合影响。
共有96名年龄在65 - 99岁的养老院患者被随机分为3组:SS组、TS组和SS + TS联合干预组,每组均进行四个20分钟的疗程。SS干预通过多感官的斯鲁泽林房实施。在每周4次治疗疗程的每次前后,测量疼痛强度水平(采用视觉模拟量表)、血压、心率、血氧饱和度和握力(使用贾马尔握力计)。此外,在整个干预前后评估生活满意度(采用生活满意度量表)和焦虑程度(采用7项广泛性焦虑障碍量表)。混合模型分析测试了这3种干预的相对疗效,并应用经图基校正的简单斜率分析。研究原理和分析计划已预先注册。
与SS组(B = 0.209,P = 0.006)和单独的TS组(B = 0.23,P = 0.002)相比,SS和TS的联合干预(SS + TS)在4个疗程中使疼痛水平降低(F = 2.62;P = 0.017;R = 0.23)。此外,与SS组(B = 0.09,P = 0.01)和单独的TS组(B = 0.016,P < 0.001)相比,SS + TS联合干预使收缩压降低(F = 5.42;P < 0.001;R = 0.29)。另外,与SS组(B = -0.35,P = 0.003)和单独的TS组(B = -0.032,P = 0.008)相比,SS + TS联合干预使握力增加(F = 2.25;P = 0.04;R = 0.19)。此外,与SS组(B = -2.38,P = 0.0042)和单独的TS组(B = -1.20,P = 0.13)相比,SS + TS联合干预使生活满意度提高(B = -4.29,P < 0.0001)(F = 3.47;P = 0.04)。最后,与SS组(B = 3.30,P = 0.01)和单独的TS组(B = 1.13,P = 0.37)相比,SS + TS联合干预在广泛性焦虑障碍症状方面有更大改善(B = 10.64,P < 0.0001)(F = 13.5;P < 0.001)。在血氧饱和度(F = 2.06;P = 0.06)、舒张压(F = 1.12;P = 0.35)和心率(F = 1.33;P = 0.23)方面,各干预组之间未显示出差异。
相对于单独的每个治疗成分,SS和TS的联合干预对养老院老年人的疼痛管理以及身心健康显示出治疗益处。这种简短的干预可以很容易地实施,以改善养老院环境中的幸福感并优化治疗资源。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05394389;https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05394389