Quay Daniel J, Harbert Karen, Schramm Wayne, Garikapaty Venkata
Author Affiliations: Office of Epidemiology, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, Missouri (Mr Quay, Ms Harbert, and Dr Garikapaty); and Bureau of Health Care Analysis and Data Dissemination, Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services, Jefferson City, Missouri (Mr Schramm).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2025;31(3):368-371. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000002091. Epub 2024 Nov 25.
There are multiple surveillance systems working to address the issue of maternal mortality in Missouri. These surveillance systems have key methodological differences in their definitions, terminology, inclusion criteria, and purpose. This study aims to provide an understanding of the practical effects of these programmatic differences regarding what cases are included and how this can impact the interpretations of the data and influence policy decisions. To accomplish this, death certificates identified by the Missouri Vital Statistics program, the Pregnancy Mortality Surveillance System, and the Pregnancy-Associated Mortality Review (PAMR) program were compared. Commonalities and differences were noted, demonstrating the real-world effects of the methodological differences between programs. In particular, the PAMR program includes injury deaths in the count of pregnancy-related deaths, which are not included by other surveillance systems. These differences highlight the importance of understanding the methodology and limitations of a dataset.
密苏里州有多个监测系统致力于解决孕产妇死亡率问题。这些监测系统在定义、术语、纳入标准和目的方面存在关键的方法学差异。本研究旨在让人们了解这些方案差异在病例纳入方面的实际影响,以及这如何影响数据解读并影响政策决策。为实现这一目标,对密苏里州生命统计项目、妊娠死亡监测系统和妊娠相关死亡审查(PAMR)项目所识别的死亡证明进行了比较。记录了它们的共性和差异,展示了各项目方法学差异的实际影响。特别是,PAMR项目在妊娠相关死亡计数中包括了伤害死亡,而其他监测系统未包括这部分。这些差异凸显了了解数据集方法学和局限性的重要性。